1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apologies for my previously lengthy reply. Requesting you to please read through it. I am all ears, if we can find the "officially corroborated" study on why symptoms of flu is exactly similar to this fake pandemic! Unfortunately, there is none!

All of the medical research today is connected and sadly corrupted by monetary greed! Gone are the days, when research was done for discovery and betterment of mankind! It's all gone. Lot's of my colleagues are extremely disappointed in what's currently happening in this field! There is support for truth, only if it is backed by funding and investors! We're all trying our best to bring our research back to what it was before. I hope you are too...

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you seriously asking for an official study against big pharma? Are you seriously willing to believe the next strain is covid-21 and so on? This "pay for play" is not going to end! If we ourselves are not skeptical in what these so called sell-out "experts" publish, then how will general population figure out all the corruption going on in the big pharma? Common now!

Big pharma has completely brainwashed our western society into taking OTC drugs as remedy for otherwise functioning natural body reactions! For eg:

  • You don't need pills for sleeping, neither do you need pills for headaches!
  • You don't need pills for common cold or fever, our innate immunity is enough!
  • You don't need vitamin, mineral, protein, iron, zinc, etc. pills! We get all that from healthy diet and sun light! Lack of any of these is not sickness, but improper diet!
  • Most of the officially listed syndromes as autistic are normal human behaviors!
  • Most of the officially listed mental illnesses are normal human behaviors with degenerative lifestyles!
  • Food allergies in kids? What in the world are we feeding our kids?
  • Why do you think there is no medicine for cancer till now? Because, there is more perpetual money in other cancer therapies than curing it!
  • Why do you think cancer is more prevalent in western countries and not in other places? Why are we not told officially that the cancer is mostly caused by diet?

If you still don't understand how the medical and pharmaceutical industries make money, then you should do little more research. I hope you've read the 5000 pages stimulus bill that was written years earlier and has got nothing to do with Covid-19 relief!

Moving on...let me ask you this, Can you provide an "official" study proving 2020 Election fraud published by any intelligence agencies funded by the Govt. and reported in the news? But, you can find plenty of local and independent studies proving it! Is it not?

2
Truth_Dispenser 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's just playing along. No need to worry at this point.

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Recordings of all known coronavirus family exists.
  • I did not ask you about the 75%+, but about the 25%+ data and how it is different.
  • Your previous link doesn't show anything about the dissimilarities.

From your first link: https://doi.org/10.1056%2FNEJMoa2001017

Complete genome sequences of the three novel coronaviruses were submitted to GISAID and have a 86.9% nucleotide sequence identity to a previously published bat SARS-like CoV genome. Since the sequence identity in conserved replicase domains (ORF 1ab) is less than 90% between 2019-nCoV and other members of betacoronavirus, the 2019-nCoV is a novel betacoronavirus belonging to the sarbecovirus subgenus of Coronaviridae family...."elude identification by traditional approaches"

So they called this novel because it is 3.1% short of 90% from a three patient study?? Really? Why did they ignore traditional approaches? Who authorized them to conclude the results from these inaccurate methods?

From your second link: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2008-3

Phylogenetic analysis of the complete viral genome (29,903 nucleotides) revealed that the virus was most closely related (89.1% nucleotide similarity) to a group of SARS-like coronaviruses (genus Betacoronavirus, subgenus Sarbecovirus) that had previously been found in bats in China5.

So they called this novel because it is 0.8% short of 90% from a one patient study?? Really?

From your third link: https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs41586-020-2012-7

The sequences are almost identical and share 79.6% sequence identity to SARS-CoV. Furthermore, we show that 2019-nCoV is 96% identical at the whole-genome level to a bat coronavirus....However, the amino acid sequences of the seven conserved replicase domains in ORF1ab that were used for CoV species classification were 94.4% identical between 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV, suggesting that the two viruses belong to the same species, SARSr-CoV.

So they called this novel because it is 10.4% short of 90% from a 7 person study. But, they conclude saying that the replicase were 94.4% identical?

Look at the percentage variations in each of their studies. These are not accurate values, but approximations. You don't isolate and name a virus as novel based on numerous approximations! That's just wrong! The fact that these studies are done in China and the Chinese CDC's involvement should've made you question the authenticity of these tests, but you seem to ignore that!

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right about different strains, but that alone shouldn't be the reason for categorizing it under a different label altogether. They even gave a separate name to the illness caused by this virus, as if people never experienced such symptoms before!

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

They renamed it "2" because they "needed" to show people that the disease caused is different from the first and not because it is a second virus which evolved from the first. If they're sure that it evolved from a feline virus, they would've said so. If it is manufactured in a lab, it would appear so. But, the fact that they destroyed any and all records on this matter should ring some alarm bells.

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you want to go little deeper? Let's do it...

  • 75%+ ? Would you like to elaborate how the other 25%+ is different? While you're at it, please do state the percentage of differences between 2 RNA viruses.

  • The current virus has already been recorded before. That is the point of this discussion. There is nothing novel about this.

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

There were several publications from other sources in the past with minute varying differences. None of these are officially available now. They should've been the same, but that wasn't the case. Hence, the speculation is that the data is fabricated. Lab data shows previously recorded sequences.

If digitally presented data were precise in all officially approved cases, then we would have zero degree of error correction in polls, dead people voting, SSN theft, welfare scams, tax audit, digital vote manipulation, etc.

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Going by their words, if the origin and the first transmission remains unknown for almost a year, then that means the virus already existed in some form prior to discovery! Also, the fact that they named it "2" doesn't necessarily scream novel isn't it?

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

From your link:

Although genetic evidence suggests that SARS-CoV-2 is a natural virus that likely originated in animals, there is no conclusion yet about when and where the virus first entered humans.

Keywords: "likely" "no conclusion"

-2
Truth_Dispenser -2 points ago +1 / -3

I do not want to disclose much, but few test swabs have been sequenced and verified at local labs resulting in legacy output. In other words, there is nothing new about this. I also don't want to share archived copies of the original initial gene sequences of "this" virus for obvious reasons. But, rest assured the truth may or may not come out for the next decade or so.

I'll leave you with this - "Who's gonna monitor the monitors, when the monitors themselves are compromised?"

-1
Truth_Dispenser -1 points ago +2 / -3

There is zero proof that this virus is novel. PCR test will not be of much help, because these data sequences are manipulated to show certain outcome. All previous official records have been either erased or conveniently manipulated!

In layman terms, you don't need a nasal swab for PCR test, if the virus is so contagious and requires a mask, isn't it?

2
Truth_Dispenser 2 points ago +2 / -0

WMD is a whole other set of can of worms. So it's better not to get into it in this forum.

There is zero proof that this virus is novel. Global pandemic was/is always an agenda by globalists. If not this, then there would be another. 2020 Election is just the tip of the iceberg. Lot more coming... unfortunately!

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +2 / -1

I am aware of those links and have spent considerable amount of time on it. Let me rephrase the question...Is there any data that shows this virus is novel and is significantly different from the rest of the earlier discovery? Not symptom wise, but data wise?

We may not be skeptical about the legitimacy of the controlling heads at NIH, but recent publications and misinformation from global agencies like these hasn't been that convincing!

The hysteria is ridiculous because the fear is not natural, it is intentionally induced to create a fake legitimacy of the whole situation. I hope you're old enough to remember Iraq's WMD, for example!

8
Truth_Dispenser 8 points ago +8 / -0

Would you like to share some of that data and sequences? Agree with the rest of your stance.

It is just one of those flu viruses that mutates every year by using human host cells. Simply put, cold and fever. Many can handle fever, some immunocompromised bodies cannot. Announced vaccine candidate is nothing but flu shot. That's all there is to it.

3
Truth_Dispenser 3 points ago +4 / -1

Curly hair vs Straight hair. Not the same person.

1
Truth_Dispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're not a paid commenter, then you're welcome to discuss your confused thoughts here. I am sure someone will clear your queries. Go ahead...

5
Truth_Dispenser 5 points ago +5 / -0

Behind the scenes. Highly classified internal matters. Digital footprint. No amount of Money can erase the truth! Because, nature protects the sane and discards the insane!

3
Truth_Dispenser 3 points ago +4 / -1

They will now. You should be thinking about why none of these scenarios are taught in schools! It's upto the president to follow the constitution, if not, then there will be no borders or countries or private ownerships in the future! Get ready!

3
Truth_Dispenser 3 points ago +4 / -1

Wrong!

If the greatest and highest judicial body of the land refuses to give their verdict based on the merits of the case, then it is understood that all three branches of the govt. are compromised! Hence, the consequences. Be prepared! Let's uphold our constitution by following the constitution!

2
Truth_Dispenser 2 points ago +2 / -0

Show of numbers. Show of support. Show of dislike against the rigged election results. Show of majority for President Trump to validate his win in 2020 Election.

Media may not cover this, but it'll wake up Republicans, moderates, etc., and give courage to legislators, congressmen, state attorneys, jurists and Supreme Court judges who're currently chickened-out!

They would understand that there will be war, if justice doesn't prevail!!!

2
Truth_Dispenser 2 points ago +2 / -0

President Trump did not fund the vaccine development, congress did. The same congress that currently thinks that there was no fraud in 2020 election! You do the math.

There are no vaccines for RNA viruses. Never were any! For a "supposed" pandemic where the survival rate is 99.9% without any vaccines or medicine, why in the hell would you need a vaccine which is 94% effective? What motives does the big pharma have in creating this vaccine, if it weren't for money and other nefarious(globalist agenda) reasons!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›