The USA isn't going to crash but it will be weakened in all aspects, spiritually, culturally, socially, economically. Most of the gains from the labour of Americans won't be going to Americans but will be going toward foreigners and the wealthy elite. They will ensure that this happens at a slow enough pace not to make Americans aware of what is going on. 2% a year. Will you notice if you earned $500 after tax dollars a year effectively?
Once they have control of the system it prevents collapse or civil wars etc... because they will have forced submission of the people. You can see this happening in all other western countries. These people already have control there. There is nothing anyone who doesn't agree with the system can do yet these societies appear "more stable" because those with competing philosophies have been forced to submit and there was no war.
The USA is honestly, the only place is the world where the people who've been forced to submit in western countries still have some power left so it appears unstable because they haven't fully submitted yet.
And yes, the plan is to transform the world. All this covid-19 stuff, the lockdowns, government subsidies, american election etc.. It's all designed to usher in a new style of society for the world but it's one in which the people you and I associate with are forced to submit to because we don't agree with it.
Only white people can be racist. White people are oppressors thus anything that helps white people is inherently racist. All things that help non-whites at the expense of white people is inherently good. If you disagree you are racist.
You can't stop them unless you have a revolution. Injustice of this kind is likely the basis of all revolutions. People "forcing" a system on another person who doesn't agree with that system.
Communists feel capitalists are forcing a system on them. Capitalists feel communists are forcing a system on them.
The only solution is one must dominate the other. You do this through force or culture war. Convince enough people to choose one view over the other. This ends up being a generational war then where you must have many children and disconnect them from the competing culture.
If you want immediate change only the use of force can get it. Promoting "freedom" in a society where half the people will use their freedom to oppress yours, doesn't work. You must suppress their freedom in order to promote your value system. One side will dominate the other side. Freedom cannot win when your society is full of people with competing ideologies that end up with one side having to submit to the other.
It's because socialism is essentially a moral view. The view that the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. As soon as you agree with this statement or any other statements which essentially says each person is equal in how utility should be allocated within a society so maximizing this utility means giving each person's individual utility equal weight.
As soon as you agree with this you haven't opened up a slippery slope, you've literally embraced communism and while you try your best to run mental gymnastics around why some middle-ground is optimal, your society is going to move more and more communist because you embraced their moral system. You lack the proper moral system to defend against communism.
It's not a slippery slope, it literally is communism.
Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known man by lying with him. - Numbers 31:17
But realistically there are two choices. You fight physically or culturally. The more oppressed you become the more children you should have and attempt to beat them at a culture war. The Amish idea isn't that far off. Creating a new ethnicity and essentially isolating yourself from those who oppress you to create your own society within their society. You beat them through children. Home-school your children and teach them your values. Don't let them brainwash and take control of your kids or they win.
Eventually, if you multiply enough, you'll win. Their culture promotes less children and their culture is unsustainable. They'll just easily lose out in the culture war.
Otherwise you go full violence and win in outright combat.
Those are really the only options.
You're comparing apples to oranges. The rationale for death penalty and what I'm saying aren't comparable.
Once you say some social programs are justified because one should have "ust enough government for a true representative republic to flourish and not one ounce more" this opens itself up for interpretation. What is "enough to flourish"? Anyone who takes this argument will likely resort to GDP/Capita as a metric but the truth is that GDP/Capita would increase without any social programs not decrease. So those who know the truth but don't want it found out change the metric to happiness or maximizing the utility of the society. A metric that is entirely subjective such that you can argue any point. The reality again is the utility actually is maximized without any social programs. Those who realize the truth of this then try to change the metric again to be equality for the sake of equality and then you have communism.
This is the path we've gone on. There is no inbetween State, they're only you eroding morality, which is that the ONLY right thing to do is to have 0 social programs. Anything else is inherently morally wrong. As soon as you allow this moral truth to be corrupted you go down the path of degradation until you're here. Any balance or compromise is a temporary situation until you're here again.
Whether you kill someone or not for punishment ultimately doesn't matter. It doesn't actually lead anywhere because the inherent moral justification within it doesn't work the same. Imprisoning someone for life vs. taking their life away is effectively the same so it's a trivial point to argue. If a government can kill anyone because the death penalty so you take it away, it doesn't change the fact that the government can still imprison anyone. A trivial point. The actual comparison is saying should the government have the right to imprison or kill anyone? Yes because this is morally just. There is nothing immoral about reacting to a criminal with just cause.
Many people domestically who receive something don't pay into the system either. You're on the right track but don't fall short of the mark. What you're suggesting is if I pay $0, I don't deserve $1000 but if I pay $1, I deserve $1000. Both are unjust. If I pay $1, I deserve $1.
Also, it can be argued that everyone not within the USA does pay into the system. The USA has used the power of its nation to enhance its wealth. Every person laboring in a foreign country for $1/h to manufacture cheap clothes for Americans have effectively paid into the system. In many respect, these people deserve more than domestic Americans.
I will not change my tune. I would rather die starving in the streets then ever lower myself to advocate for the very poison that his ruining society. I will not lower myself to that.
Government is the reason we have a depression and then you're falling for the age old trick of all communists that government must be the solution to the very problem governments created. That is how you lock in your servitude forever when you start to think this way because they've effectively made you submit to their communist philosophy.
- Augusto Pinochet
- Hitler
- Putin
You're seeing many of the previous Communist countries that embraced open democratic societies as slowly moving toward communism again. It is that very freedom of western democracies that leads toward communism. The USA used to be far more "authoritarian" 150 years ago with laws that many today see as against individual freedom. As those opened up, the USA moved toward communism.
You're going to find as long as you cling to universal suffrage democracy you'll never escape communism.
So you believe in National Communism vs. International Communism.
Why do you believe in helping your own people with these beliefs of yours? Why don't you believe in helping foreigners? What difference does it make?
Perhaps you can find other republicans who share your beliefs, get together and then voluntarily pay people a UBI out of the fund you collect. What gives you the authority and justification to forcibly tax others to redistribute the benefits of their labour toward others in a manner of your choosing?
Imagine a constitutional dictatorship where the dictator ensured adherence to the constitution. Law were put in place to clamp down on all people who sought to overthrow the constitution. Antifa was designated a terrorist organization. Public schools changed the curriculum to promote the values in the constitution and teachers who promoted authoritarianism were fired/not hired. The government used its authoritative to transfer the State into the very State you want, one that used to be called America. Would you call this authoritarian? Probably not but all the communists would call it authoritarian.
Corruption is rooted in individualism and the competition between nations. As we root out the oppressive individualism that straight white men perpetuated in order to oppress others in society, you'll find that humans are in fact not as "corruptible" as you imagine. Most humans want to do good but the evils of the oppressive sociopathic white people is in essence what corrupts them. Once we remove capitalism and the systems these white people have forced on us to instead unite in a communist society, there will be significantly less corruption. Humanity will come together for a common purpose. Love and compassion will flourish. There will be some bad leaders from time to time but they'll be found out and dealt with like we do now. Overall though, the central government is still controlled by the people within the government and the people voting in governments so we'll deal with corruption just like how we dealt with Donald Trump. By voting corruption out in legitimate fair elections. The only way corruption wins is when they try to steal elections like Trump did.
Once the global communism takes hold, we'll be able to move onto more important things then this culture war the white oppressors have forced upon us. Once white men see the error of these ways they can finally be loved and enjoy the ecstasy that is communism! It will be a utopia and I can't wait!*
*okay how did I do impersonating a leftist?