1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is an idiot, that is precisely why she cannot be ignored. Especially since she is an idiot that is at minimum being a stalking horse for a lot of the powers behind the coming regime.

2
Turtler 2 points ago +2 / -0

So are constitutions. How has that been working the last few months?!?

2
Turtler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not to worry! Comrade Jorge is just introducing economic strategies pioneered by his fellow Hispanic Socialists into the Vatican.

4
Turtler 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes it looks like Parler has a pretty strong anti-trust, anti-competitive case against them.... until you remember what happened to what looked like a pretty strong anti-fraud, anti-democratic case against the despotic machines of Atlanta, Philadelphia, and so on.

I imagine that what passes for the "legal authorities" in our decayed Republic will laugh the case right out of court and then laugh all the way to the bank.

1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok Lin, I've generally been a fan of yours, but

A: What evidence do you have?

B: What evidence will you actually SHOW?!?

C: When did you get this? And did you decide to sit on it for a while?

Turning on a dime is disgusting. It's disgusting when Pence did it, but going immediately to "Traitor and Child Molester' from Memetic Hero without DAMN solid proof (of both, the former can fit well) is sort of like saying you won a card game but refusing to show the cards.

Tik Tok is Tocking Obsolete.

2
Turtler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry for the delay, have been thoroughly bummed. "A Republci IF YOU CAN KEEP IT" and all being thrown out the window..

But in a word yes. Which was a major reason why they persecuted the so called "Confessing Church" (In reality a coalition of churches or at least church denomination officials who refused to kiss the Fuhrer's ring). It's important to note that even before the National Socialists took over Germany was far more statist and socialist than we often think, with its own state church in the Imperial Era and draconian religious enforcement (hence Bismarck's "Kulturkampf'- Cultural Struggle- against Catholics). So the Nazis could largely subordinate them.

2
Turtler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hitler probably didn’t burn down the Reichstag, as far as we know he and his thugs didn’t even plan it. That was Commie propaganda after the fact, likely to disguise from how the idiot who did do it was a Commie pyromaniac trying to create a Commie Revolution named Marinius van Der Lubbe. But they did take advantage of it.

Here though? The left certainly created an excuse.

15
Turtler 15 points ago +15 / -0

Specifically it was one known communist- as well as a known Pyromaniac- Marinus van Der Lubbe, who was apparently found on scene with a lot of burn residue. And notably he offered no defense at his trial and was the only one of several defendants (including many leading Comintern agents) who was convicted (which led Hitler to spazz out at the audacity of the judiciary would have a fair trial.).

Apparently moron wanted to torch the place as some kind of grand signal to start the Communist Revolution without actually telling anyone his plans.

But of course bad actors can usually plan. Same reason why that bitch drafted up an Enabling Act on January 5th.

1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

I figure he kind of has to say this, both to show this isn't the "coup" or "sedition" idiots are talking about, but also to show we respect the law. But I think it's mostly a PR stunt. DC is the Swamp, and the DC Police have been thoroughly corrupted. In case the AntifA riots were not any indication.

They are not your friends. Whether they are "truly on the side of our Country' Is not something I would wager. FOLLOW THE LAW but be prepared. And remember that resistance to tyrants is obedience to God's Law.

So step up to the line and then no further, and see whether they want to play tyrant that much.

1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, he by and large was not. You don’t make a Concordact with people you are blessing. You make it with people you can barely stand but want to patch up wounds with

https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4551&context=open_access_etds

Moreover Pius used subsidiaries or proxies like Cardinal von Galen of Muenster to speak against the Nazi Party when he felt he didn’t have enough coverage to do it.

https://www.historyplace.com/speeches/galen.htm

As a Protestant and history nerd there’s plenty I can bitch about with the Catholic Church and the Popes- especially now- but it used to be rather rare that Popes openly sucked off socialist superpowers.

1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, it is a shame. Because in case you haven’t noticed, Know Your Enemy is literally ancient wisdom. So even for the works that were even more degenerate and worthless than the worst carcicature, it would be useful to be able to point to them and show what the likes of KPD fans are.

Hell, even the supremely cucked globalist idiots like modern Germany keep The Eternal Jew and assorted SED Stalinist shut around.

1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

They did both, as well as a lot of other stuff vandalism. Indeed a minor reason why Hitler and Roehm fell out was because Roehm’s SA would often burn bookstores and printing presses without authorization.

1
Turtler 1 point ago +4 / -3

The Nazis were leftist degenerates in their own right (of you’ll pardon the pun; see the shit Josef Goebbels got up to). They fought and murdered everyone who stood in the way of their power, left or right. Just ask Hitler’s predecessor as Kanzler.

And they burned a lot more than Commie or sex change books. Indeed during the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact they even burned reports of the Holodomor.

20
Turtler 20 points ago +23 / -3

Not a good summary. About half the points are false or misleading.

  • They only made a carpet ban of guns in occupied territories (where the standing orders of the OKW and friends made it a death sentence for civilians to possess a firearm or grenade). Within the Reich proper they advanced on pre-Nazi gun registration, basically criminalizing ownership by “undesirables” and making ownership contingent on political allegiance but not outlawing it. Halbrook’s Gun Control and the Third Reich covers this best

  • Got rid of God: Hitler and his close circle certainly tries, but they recognized direct confrontation with Christian churches was suicide (and indeed even some fanatical Nazis like Erich Koch remained more or less orthodox Christians). So they instead sought to undermine and rot away the foundations of God and his moral code in favor of thinly or not so thinly veiled neopaganism.

*Banned church service: Not true, sadly. The Nazis persecuted unauthorized church services, but just like we have no shortage of false shepherds or state churches today like in ChiCom China and with “Rev”s like Warnock and Wo-amen, there were plenty of German churches and services that sold out. Hence why German chaplains and church services continued through to the very end of the war.

  • Burned Bibles and Books in the street: true, for once.

  • Tore down statues : also true.

  • Burned the flag: they did something way more insidious. They slowly legislated the flag out of existence until there was only the Parteiflag, first banning the Republican Tricolor and putting the Imperial Tricolor and Swastika on equal levels, and then banning the Tricolor. Hitler and co might be socialist idiots but they were patriotic socialist idiots and also- unlike ours- recognized how distasteful and horrifying mass burnings of National flags would be.

  • Got rid of any and all history that disagreed: true.

*Got rid of the public police so only the rich could afford it: LOL fuck no, and this smells like attempts to pint the Nazis as something other than statist socialists

Not only did the Nazis not get rid of public police, they greatly expanded their powers and subordinated them to Party command. For instance the Prussian State Police became the Gestapo.

And no amount of “riches” could legally help you if you ran afoul of the Parry as Hugo Eckner showed.

  • Put their country in a state of fear: true.

*Created Domestic Terrorist organizations: true.

Understand the enemy. A lot of times the threats are far more insidious and subtle. Forearmed is forewarned. Especially since we have seen a lot of this shot being imitated by others.

8
Turtler 8 points ago +8 / -0

Justice Delayed is Justice Denied. From Japan there's a saying. "(Tokugawa) Ieyasu won the country by running away", by delaying battle with his opponents until the time of His choosing and wearing them down. They're trying to drag this out until we give up hope. I Know a bunch of my family have already done so. Don't let them do it.

Otherwise the long, stultifying tyranny of the Tokugawa Shogunate will look positively HUMANE compared to the Leftist "Paradise."

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Turtler 1 point ago +1 / -0

well i can argue with you on one point. when can centralized banking start the one child policy or worse? when people the CCP centralize the banks under themselves and print all the money and own all the companies.

The problem is that doesn't talk about Centralized Banking per se. it's about the CCP.

The CCP already imposed draconian and tyrannical measures of birth control on the people under its control back in the 1927-onwards exile in Yenan Province following the Long March; it's just that those measures were typically much less brutal and more restricted than the One Child Policy in full bloom. But a regime without any sort of centralized or systematic banking was still able to impose its fiat by the party dictatorship.

That was the nucleus of the system that Mao spread out after the Japanese and anti-Commie Nationalists had killed each other to a standstill and the West turned a blind eye. So at most central banking was a tool the CCP used to transfer is pre-existing centralized power onto the system.

thats a great example of centralization gone wrong. those fuckers just manipulate and lie about what the value actually even is.

Oh I agree. And I am no friend of Central Banks or their shenanagins. But the idea that they are more destructive than totalitarianism strikes me as deluded.

view more: Next ›