Not a very good grifter, he would have to flee the USA and live under the radar if he swiped a legal war chest that was meant for the fraud cases. He s likely to end up in jail or disbarred if the case goes south. Not to mention the death threats and hell the left likes to put public trump supporters thru. He s putting his life, legacy, and fortune on the line to do this. The left is determined to absolutely ruin anyone publicly tied to trump once they're in power
Alot harder on urban areas, I had no wait this year in NC, had about an hour wait in 2016. I had a 3 hour wait in 2012 when I lived in Northern VA. But employers do have to allow you time. But its not necessarily going to squeeze in a lunch break on some cities
Wife is a MD at a large family practice, she s had a few in a 2000 patient panel. She had an 80+ year old lady with lots of comorbidities pull though at home. She also had a 40 year old male who was on a vent for two months. He s waiting for a lung transplant now, but there was a few weeks where they didn't know if he was brain dead or not. Cases are peaking here now, she saw very little early on, especially bc covid symptoms were told to go to a covid clinic or the ER. They just started seeing covid/flu in person recently
Still waiting on a case to worm its way to scotus. Scotus has been the endgame regardless how lower courts rule. If they ruled in trumps favor then the dems would be appealing. It has been demoralizing so far watching all the courts wave off obvious fraud, but the positive aspect of that is it may have saved several weeks of litigation in a lower court
They will destroy scotus regardless. They can't stand the thought of 5-4 conservative. The only thing stopping that is four more years of trump and proper election reform to keep the votes honest and prevent a Dem supermajority
If trump can't pull out a win as the incumbent and change federal elections, noone else will stand a chance.
I hope that the first election case to make it to scotus is the most clear cut constitutionally. That first case will be the one to rule them all.
Clinton, soros, Brennan, any current sitting senator or house rep involved in this fraud nonsense, comey and his little side kick that got to skate off with no charges
All highly unlikely, but a man can dream. Brennan would probably be most likely if Durham s report doesn't get buried
Strips protections for Facebook, Twitter, etc. Right now they use it and play both sides of the fence. Acting like a publisher but claiming g to be a platform. Without 230 they would be open to tremendous lawsuits
Perdue and Loeffler need to be some of the loudest voices on the fraud. They are not. They re not even trying. Trump and trump voters shouldn't be carrying their rino asses over the finish line if they refuse to fight
Flip side is that you also see alot of support for the orthodox jews in NY for refusing to stand down to Cuomo s decrees. Other than trump rallies, they've been the only group to repeatedly ignore the lock down nonsense
The senators have been a disappointment. I won't back any of those rinos. Paul and Cruz have been the only two to not be huge uniparty assholes. I m ok with losing the majority in the senate if trump wins. They won't have enough to bypass a veto. And after this shit show of an election. I don't see how both sides of the aisle could seriously ignore election reform if its put on the table. Election reform then get the senate back in 2 years.
Trump has to pull out the win, senate won't matter otherwise. Yes we can talk about keeping the senate out of dem control in a possible biden presidency, but if they can cheat trump in multiple states with no repercussions, then those senate seats don't stand a chance. Those GA senators need to be out there in the trump crowd shouting at gov kemp to not be a sleezeball.
Oh please, her personal risk is approaching zero. Rudy s a far higher risk category than her. They could've atleast tried that angle with one of the many cryptkeepers we call politicians