Remember how confident they were that "the walls are closing in" on Trump and that he would be out of office any day now?

That's not confidence, it's hubris.

In Trump we trust.

Saying she would blow up Georgia first. And because they are lefties.

SPEZ: I was wrong! Here: https://thedonald.win/p/11QRtbiYSO/pedes-sidney-powell-was-suspende/c/

Awesome. Very well said. Who can legitimately argue against what he said?

The odds of this happening organically are infinitesimal.

I've seen you asked that question at least four times.

Tell that to Tucker.

What kind of rack are the magazines on?

Good observation.

Agree, good summary of three prongs. All true, all necessary and relevant.

So unusual to see, and it used to be so common. That right there tells you how they have fallen.

It was good to hear CodeMonkey break it down in a way normies could follow. I hadn't seen that and he did a good job.

Yes it was him.

It's just better to say so. More credible.

Yeah, that's where we're at right now. Or at least you and me are....

No. Hang in there a bit longer pede. Something is going to break one way or the other soon. Not sure how soon, but it can't stay this way so it won't. See you on the other side.

This is the way.

"Women are supposed to be protected."

Such a basic truth, and it has almost been lost in our society.

This is the way.

You have to post it first, then you can select flair to add.

One of the two - the special still has to have a runoff.

The concern is that you can't tell which ones they are. You don't know which ones to throw out. So if you throw votes out at all, they could be legitimate votes and therefore you are disenfranchising legal voters. Which is exactly why it's not supposed to happen this way.

I had the same impression. I'm not entirely sure what the sheet is reporting. If EACH row is additional votes, then the fact that the numbers repeat for each report from a precinct is itself a huge problem, regardless of the ratio. But I don't think that's it.

SPEZ: On second thought, he SORTED it first, so these are not consecutive reports. If he then FILTERED for that ratio then the sheet starts to make sense. I think the fact that so many reports from the same precinct came in at the exact same ratio is in-and-of-itself a big thing. The odds against that happening are just too high. Then when you add onto the the observation that the behavior ends only to repeat at a different precinct, it clearly seems to be a problem.

Yes, fuck you.

I hope Doggos and the bois eventually get time to whip up one of those format thingies that shows you the mark-up so dipshits like you and me can do it without remembering.

And thanks for the links.

Exactly the way it is supposed to work.