1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

You write only "old video" and then are asked for when and where and you get nasty. What, so if I make a random claim and someone asks me for further information I should expect them to take me at my word?

No, dude. Welcome to people asking you to back up your claim. And in the end you just link to a Q forum where people are debating it. And now after that angry tirade you're trying to claim you weren't angry (lol) over what was a minor request.

Why would anyone see "old video" and take you at your word? This site is being bombarded by shills. Skepticism is a good thing. You shouldn't get angry at being asked for further information.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boy, you're upset at being asked to back your claim. It's just foot stomping and "WHY DO I HAVE TO PROVE WHAT I SAY?! IT'S NOT FAIR!" Like, grow up.

And all you did is link to a bunch of other people debating the video. You're so ballistic with rage at having to actually be productive and do work for yourself. You made that claim, not me, so back it up. It's not hard. I can't believe how lazy you are and then to throw an utter tantrum.

You want people to not believe everything they see on the internet, but then are upset when they don't believe YOU.

And all that link goes to is other people discussing it. Why are you throwing a hissy fit when you're asked to do some work and back up your claim?

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

So... you really did just make crap up. No one should believe your claim at all.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, then it's easy! Where was this? You said it's not DC. If you're the one trying to prove it's not true, then you need to show you're evidence. It's silly that you want to just write "old video" and expect everyone to take you at your word.

You claim "It's not DC" and all you have to say is where. It's reaaaaaaal easy, sweetie.Where is this?

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean "deboonked", sweetie. You're just bitter because you got caught making crap up.

0
TypicalEd 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol. Yup, it's true you just debunked you're own claim. Well done.

You couldn't prove jack.

0
TypicalEd 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol. If you saw it, why is it hard to just name the place. You just write, "old video" and now you're saying it's not even in DC. I'd assume for you to make that claim you have looked at the original. So it takes 2 seconds just to say where it is.

You just wanted to discredit this without being called out on it.

If you have already looked at the original to confirm it's not in DC (which you haven't even said you have. Did you look at the original?), then where did this happen?

It's not hard. Just say it.

3
TypicalEd 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ironically when I scan New and Rising the majority of Q posts are just posts complaining about how Q posts and how they're ruining this site.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why don't you provide the original video?

And where was this then? You sound desperate.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

How old is the video? You're trying to say its an "old" video. Do you mean three days old? Three months old?

And now you're upset because you're getting called out for trying to discredit this by saying "old video". How old? One week? One month?

You've basically said it's 2-3 days old. That's NOT old.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol.

Because yesterday is "old".

3
TypicalEd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shills be like, "NOOOO! YOU MUSN'T COMMUNICATE! WE MUSTN'T ALLOW THAT! SHUT UP, QTARDS!"

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok, can you prove it. Where is the original then? You say it's old video. When did you see that exact video? Where and when was the original taken? Provide links.

2
TypicalEd 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did finally check out a documentary about Q because I wanted to know the reason for the shill and Deep States convulsions at the mention of Q. One thing of note is that Q mentions that most of the photos it posts are original. Aka the ones of the children the elite have allegedly "taken" are original. If that's true, it must've scared the living shit out of some of the pedos in the elite to see those photos out where anyone could see them.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's dated to January 15th. That's like maybe 48 hours ago. I know it's a repost of a tik tok, but both are not that old.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wasn't trying to criticize you. I just honestly think (hope) that's what he meant.

3
TypicalEd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hm... odd. I feel like I read about this is in a history book once.

3
TypicalEd 3 points ago +4 / -1

You triGGeReD the Shills. You know they're psychotically obsessed with Q. They keep crying it's a "psyop" which makes no sense given the media's determination to wipe it off the internet. If it was a psyop, the media would push it EVERWHERE.

1
TypicalEd 1 point ago +1 / -0

As the shills scramble to cry, "ThiS Is NOrMAL". Yes, this IS necessary to control Trump supporters. I don't know about you, but we should be flattered if the Deep State thinks this isn't enough to stop us.

29
TypicalEd 29 points ago +30 / -1

Dims dialed 911 in a panic, "Omg! It was hideous. I think some kind of zombie, yes zombie is roaming the halls of Congress. It looked like the crypt keeper! Send help! OH wait!. Never mind it was just Pelosi."

0
TypicalEd 0 points ago +1 / -1

Oh shills are so predictable. Why don't get your soyboy ass back to reddit and stop with the "Q RuiNED EvERyTHinG" obsession. Pretty sure the corrupt court system and rampant fraud of the Deep State. But yeah, blaming conspiracy theory posts that the vast majority of Trump supporters don't even rid is the ticket.

sigh You shills are so silly.

5
TypicalEd 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

I don't think he's going to fake a assassination. That's my thoughts.

view more: Next ›