And why are they so maniacally focused on shutting down RESTAURANTS? I have some ideas... restaurants are where citizens congregate and discuss current events and politics. It seems they are trying to prevent the masses from riling each other up and organizing against the tyranny
The fires of the WTC may have burned at a few hundred degrees centigrade, as they were belching the black smoke of oxygen deprived fires. The fires did not even cover a whole floor. Steel is a massive heat sink so the steel around the fires was probably even cooler.
Moreover, just watch the footage of the buildings coming down: there is clearly a wave of annihilation and pulverization of concrete running ahead of the level of destruction of the building. The bottom is being annihilated ahead of the falling building. Think about it: if there is not some intervention destroying the level below the falling debris of the building, then the building is falling into the path of most resistance. When a Jenga tower falls, does it just annihilate the level of the wood blocks below it, or does it naturally topple over?
Furthermore there are multiple lateral ejections of large pieces of steel. Gravity cannot eject things laterally. Gravity cannot pulverize concrete into fine powder (consider dropping a cinder block off your balcony. What do you predict would happen? Would it poof into dust?) There is really a tremendous amount of evidence that a ridiculously high energy exothermic reaction of some sort was responsible for annihilating the WTC, including giving rise to hulls of scorched cars in the vicinity.
Environmental damage by masks is real tho, those nasty things end up everywhere, even my yard
Needs more fog city Midge
This is a caricature of the libertarian position. There is no advocation of drug use per se. There is advocation of the Liberty to choose to ingest drugs without being thrown into a cage. Same with sexual degeneracy. Libertarians can believe one should be free to do things yet believe it is usually better not to do them.
Borders are a nuanced issue in libertarian philosophy. In general, yes, most libertarians agree they are usually arbitrary lines drawn by the state and maintained by force, but as they offer some degree of protection for certain communities, again, there is nothing per se wrong with borders. Libertarians are not faggots; maybe the ones associated with the party are, but Ron Paul is a cultural predecessor of Trump, and Murray Rothbard, Mises, Hayek, et al. have had some of the most important insights into the economy ever.
Axing 230 would simply enshrine these companies forever. No upstart company could ever comply with the onerous work of staying out of legal trouble as a publisher. The big companies that exist already could.
The head of the department of health directing the coronavirus fiasco in either Michigan or one of the states that packed nursing homes with known covid patients during their obsession with ventilators
Stoooooooop
And ICU’s typically are designed to run near 100% capacity anyway, as maintaining beds without patients is very expensive
These field hospitals are mostly useless props anyway
The author of revelation is John of Patmos, not Paul, and as I understand there are two versions, one with 666 and one with 616, which can be alphanumerically transformed to either Nero (616), or Neron (666), the Roman and Greek versions respectively of the name of Nero.
That’s wild
Try 99.999% if you are under 70
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html
Nice synthesis. The point about pre-suppositions and theoretical modeling as the basis for claims on the efficacy of community masking is important: they simply assume mask wearing is effective, assign values to a range of different associated parameters (eg, make up a value for the number of infections reduced per person wearing a mask), then spit out a conclusion that masking saves x number of lives. Pure circular reasoning.
That won’t get you fat because you could be an ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIER, never mind that it is by definition unfalsifiable to prove you are not. So the correct response is actually, “that’s just a hypothesis.”
Wearing a mask outdoors has zero supporting scientific evidence as a means to mitigate a pandemic. Zero. Not a single study, and all the studies of masking in the community setting INDOORS are also null. This is voodoo, yet I’m sure this person would say, “these rubes just hate SCIENCE!”
Given the behavior of the UK lately has been indistinguishable from that of the EU, what difference has Brexit even made?
Maps that appear pizza related
Can you expand on that? Have you considered operating anyway, escalating the situation?
It doesn’t need to be a universal standard. Let local communities figure it out for themselves, based on its particular population’s properties, values, disposition, etc. Voting age would need to be fixed but the rest of those things really don’t need to be
Regarding factors that may influence your odds in the covid lottery...
I would tell them to go pound sand. They have no authority to demand to know who my contacts have been.
I mean, it’s s real thing for people with autism. Not sure what the problem with such a term is