She reminds me of Sheila Jackson Lee here in Houston. Not an ounce of character and cannot engage in any intellectual conversation, spews rhetoric fit for the masses at all times. She wins by default every time simply because of the district that she runs.
You still need to make a forensic image of the machines involved in order to prove what was done. Sure he broke policy by using thumb drive, but in a court you won't prove votes were swindled without those artifacts showing what was done exactly.
Not without forensic images of either PC involved unfortunately.
If you handed me that laptop/PC hard drive I could tell you within an hour exactly what he did with that USB drive, but you can't prove anything without that data.
This isn't a smoking gun for us. I would imagine he broke policy by using a thumbdrive on a government asset, but it's very common to happen, especially if it's an old outdated PC without group policy controls in place to prevent USB drive from being used.
I've conducted many interviews where ding dongs will claim to know how to script, then you hand them a marker and a whiteboard and say "How would you ping a remote computer with x packets using PowerShell?"
Then you laugh when they say "it's been a while, I'm a bit rusty" 50% of the time.
Cybersecurity pede here, unfortunately you aren't really proving that he did something with malicious intent here.
I can say that USB thumbdrives, which have self-executing code, are always considered a no-no in the security world, but you HAVE TO GET A FORENSIC IMAGE.
Without the forensic image of that election PC or the laptop, you won't be able to find required artifacts that prove what actions occurred, the video is simply a shot in the dark to say that he was swindling votes.
If I had to guess, it's some tech monkey who needed to put a driver or tool onto the election PC that isn't connected to the internet.
It's definitely bad practice, but I don't think this is a smoking gun unless you can get a forensic image of all hosts involved.
My favorite line was when he told the white university liberal kid (clamoring about white privilege) that he should give up his seat in college to a minority. Of course the kid argued that it’s his “platform to have a voice”
He followed it up with a crushing blow that is unforgettable, a testament to his big swinging Indian schlong...
“You won’t give up your seat because you want society to enforce your moral code before you do”
One of my favorite political debate ass reamings of all time
It’s a common technique we use in security to prevent people from clicking a link, even though not an actual HTML link some browsers will automatically treat it as a link.
Popular to use when rewriting URLs in various email security programs to prevent your dumb users from going to www.ammazon.com/validateyourpassword
We love Dan here in Houston, at face value his stance on Red Flag laws seems bad. Go have a read for yourself though. It's not EXACTLY what I would want a candidate to do, but he crushes it in every other category and would make a fine president one day.
Everybody brings a social security card with a photo ID to get a "voting token", this will have a private certificate on it and is accessed via fingerprint and PIN.
Counties will issue these. Each certificate is authenticated ONE time per election, then the server does not allow for another.
Prints out paper ballot with your unique hash, fill out the ballot and drop in the box.
No illegals would be able to get it, SSN/Photo ID validates your eligbility, done.
They mask up and stick with the mob for impunity. There is no real answer to it, take the Kyle Rittenhouse route and you’re dragged through the mud by the media and locked up. Do nothing and try to leave and you experience what happened in the video. Bad situation we have going here, and until cities are ran by somebody other than spineless democrat DAs, there won’t be punishment for these cowards.
Playing devil's advocate here, mainly looking for a response to all the people who are going to say this to me outside of here, how long would it take to process those votes in person/counting before they would hit that chart?
I think what I'm gonna hear is "those machines can only do X amount of votes per hour, no way it pops up in 20 minutes"