23
UndercoverSpez 23 points ago +23 / -0

Was anything on the table after impeachment?

3
UndercoverSpez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Put every Republican on spot. Worst case scenario everyone knows where they stand

by Bullgod
4
UndercoverSpez 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cool strip his "R". I know he doesnt care, and he will be a hero to the left, but I do.

3
UndercoverSpez 3 points ago +3 / -0

She hasn't said "no" yet. Just political speak about what Republicans 'should' do. There will be a couple other people who will 'agonize' over their decision while both parties pressure them.

5
UndercoverSpez 5 points ago +5 / -0

Honestly let her vote no then. We need to see where Republican senators stand and vote accordingly

41
UndercoverSpez 41 points ago +41 / -0

This. Everyone and theor mother knows that her and a few others will have to "agonize" for a while before making a decision

4
UndercoverSpez 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah was it politics in the puriest form when McConnell and Republicans (who held the Senate) refused to vote in Obama's judge? Yes, and to the shogren of alot of the people on this website I disagreed with that decision in 2016. However to think that in 2016 if the dems had the Senate that they wouldn't have forced a nomination is laughable, and to think that after a partisan impeachment (with no crime) and the russia hoax (thats still peddled by some Democrats) that the Democrats can demand decency and decorm is even funnier.

9
UndercoverSpez 9 points ago +9 / -0

Rioting was bad for the Republicans for maybe the first month now when a leftist riots they are practically joining the Trump reelection campaign. This would even be better optics because while BLM and antifa can be labled "anarchists" or "communist" these riots will be all blue blood "Democrat"

2
UndercoverSpez 2 points ago +2 / -0

Energized dems for SC seat. Dems voting Trump cause their party has gone off the deep end hold their nose for a Judicial pick

5
UndercoverSpez 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ok. If Republicans dont push through a nominee ill never vote gOP again once Trump leaves. Dont need a party that wont fight

3
UndercoverSpez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thats why we need to appoint a judge asap. Never expect the gOP to not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory though.

2
UndercoverSpez 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was my first thought yesterday. Too bad the GOP will fail us

7
UndercoverSpez 7 points ago +7 / -0

Jesus christ Durham needs to come out

3
UndercoverSpez 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's because they know the GOP wont do it right back

by user999
2
UndercoverSpez 2 points ago +2 / -0

McConnell played dirty politics imho, but the dems have played worse these last 4 years. Basically "dont expect anybody to do something for you that you wont do for them" is my mantra for pushing a judge through before the election

2
UndercoverSpez 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol Ted Cruz for the REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES

3
UndercoverSpez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thomas might also retire

2
UndercoverSpez 2 points ago +2 / -0

2a. Abortion rulings if you're against that.

5
UndercoverSpez 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here's an easier way. Fill the seat before hand. Of course thats assuming the GOP had anything spine at all. If the senate doesnt elect a new supreme court judge they have helped the Democrats win.

2
UndercoverSpez 2 points ago +2 / -0

The question is do the rinos in the GOP feel the same way.

4
UndercoverSpez 4 points ago +4 / -0

An empty supreme judge seat hurts Trumps reelection. Mitt wont vote.

1
UndercoverSpez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not putting a judge in the seat not only hurts Trumps reelection odds, but leaves us in a worse position when all the mail in vote controversies come after the election

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›