1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you a bot? My post has nothing to do with Q and your response seems quite off. I'm reporting you for being a bot.

2
UnemployedMarx 2 points ago +2 / -0

My favourite part of the story is when police then turned around and took orders from their enemies like a bunch of cowardly dogs while at the same time attacking the men and women who stood beside them in their moment of need. Police are scum.

2
UnemployedMarx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately, I was in a 7 year relationship where I loved the woman and she loved me, for a time. I know what that feeling is like. I almost envy all the young kids growing up today that have never felt the emotion of love before, despite being well into their 20s. I think maybe if I didn't know what I was missing I could do without it.

I can quit dating but then what? Go to the gym, play video games, work more to earn more money to... go to the gym, play videos games? Maybe travel to another country and pretend how much better it'd be to live there even though it's mostly the same? I dunno, I want love and companionship so I'll keep trying despite how dismal it is and the fact I'll likely fail.

9
UnemployedMarx 9 points ago +9 / -0

What I don't get, and this is just a little off-topic so I don't meant to derail but how is anyone finding successful relationships these days? I went back on the dating market and all I see are the following:

  • White women who say they only want to date black at an extremely high rate
  • BLM/Gay Flag love or no deal
  • Women saying if you voted Trump to swipe left
  • If you mention to a woman you think masks don't work, you think lockdowns are bad or whatever, they instantly unmatch you.

You've lost all your friends... well, I dunno how people are making new friends. Everyone is an NPC out there.

19
UnemployedMarx 19 points ago +19 / -0

People have been brainwashed. I texted an old childhood friend I hadn't chatted with in like a year happy bday and somehow we talked about stuff and it turns out he's a full blown communist now. He hated politics when we were younger and I have no clue why he's a full blown communist but he is. The irony is he failed university and took 8 years to graduate with him having to write the dean because his program's max years was 7. Then when he graduated he just lived at home unemployed for 3 years because he didn't feel like working. He finally got a job and now he's preaching to me how he's underpaid and classism is the biggest problem in the world. I'm like nah bro you're just lazy.

4
UnemployedMarx 4 points ago +4 / -0

To be fair, I could see trangender soldiers as being useful as fodder. Just make an all trans division and promote it as proving trans as just as competent as everyone else, like all female groups, then send the all trans division into combat first as fodder when needed.

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

I disagree. There's nothing wrong with shorting if everyone involved plays by the rules. Here are the rules.

  • If someone shorts a stock and cannot afford to purchase the stock when time to pay up comes due, they go bankrupt, period.
  • If the brokerage firm which took the position is unable to provide the stock to the original buyer who went counter to the short position, then the brokerage firm goes bankrupt
  • The buyer of the stock doesn't gain his stock. This is a risk he took in dealing with the brokerage firm that he knew engages in short positions and is now bankrupt.

Those are the rules. If no one is willing to play by them then ban shorts but if everyone plays by these rules then shorts are fine. The problems only arise when people change the rules.

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Complex subject. I'll bite.

It starts with the Bible... okay, really it does... lol, this could be a while haha...

The Hebrew Bible is very masculine dominant based. The Talmud is also extremely masculine dominant.

On the other hand Christianity as a religion is very submissive relative to the Jewish texts. One might even give Christianity a feminine or communist theme when compared to how masculine dominant the Jewish texts are.

This matters because many people associate Christianity as a major factor in the fall of Rome. Rome was at odds with the Jews. The Romans did not like the Jews. The two cultures clashes with one another and vied for dominance. The Romans of course had the dominance. Some people believe Christianity was created by Jews in order to bring down the Rome. And it was very effective in degrading Roman society; however, the Romans countered by embracing the religion and making it their own. This is the Roman Catholic Church. The Roman Catholic Church changed Christianity somewhat to make it a more masculine dominant overall by incorporating some aspects of Roman morality into it which is why older Catholic teaching overlap a lot with Aristotle when it comes to views on morality.

In the end though, Rome fell and the Jews flourished. Christianity was successful in its original goal but not absolutely for Christianity was supposed to weaken Roman morality such that Judaism became the dominant religion. Christian again is a very submissive religion. The peak of the religion is having no children, being meek and turning the other cheek. Judaism in contrast is a dominant religion like Islam. The only reason Christian societies have become so dominant is the latent Greek-Roman values/beliefs that have stayed prominent. The enlightenment period and the USA were founded on the revitalization of Greek-Roman values/beliefs. These are masculine dominant values/beliefs and the ones ultimately that Judaism has been at war with for thousands of year.

Now thousands of years later many people are seeing similarities to the international communist values and beliefs that are degrading society and the feminine submissive weak values/beliefs of true Christianity as the Jews intended. Without a doubt international communism is a feminine submissive value system not a masculine dominant one. Globalism and this international communist system has been pushed by predominantly Jews. Bankers are behind a lot of the late 19th century onward push. Jews were behind the Bolshevik revolution. This is not me being fascist, these are facts. Anywhere there is globalism, banking and communism you have had a disproportionate amount of Jews involved.

There has only been 1 major attempt globally at fighting against international and this was Hitler. Hitler saw what the Jews were up to. Now it might honestly have nothing to do with the fact they were Jewish but nonetheless, it was mostly Jews responsible. Hitler correctly correlated the problem with society to Jews and decided this correlation was also the causation, which is debatable as correct or not. There does appear to be a genetic link to communism and Jews perhaps are more prone to having the genes which make people more likely to promote communist value systems. In any regard, Hitler declared war on international communism and lost. Well, this war still rages on today and we're losing. International Communism has effectively won against the USA which was truly the last country to have prevalent Greek-Roman values rooted in masculine dominance.

Anyone opposed to international communism and understands the war going on is going to bring up Jews because somewhere in the mix Jews are involved more so than any other race/culture besides Christians and white men who adhere to Greek-Roman values. It's all intertwined, that's why Jews get brought up so much. And lastly, about 2% of the US population is Jewish but Jews control 40% of the wealth...given this, Jews are going to be discussed, a lot. Jews are basically the anti-black people. If there's any privileged race in this world it is the Jewish people not white people.

2
UnemployedMarx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Capitalists: This is tyranny. Fuck the system. Bring it down! We need freeeeeeedddddoommm markets.

Communists: Huh, our regulation didn't work this time so we'll try to make it better and regulate it even more so next time it'll work, I promise.

2
UnemployedMarx 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's tricky. Gamers used to be quite conservative as a whole but feminists especially have been targeting the gaming communities to make them more left-wing and it's working. A lot of the prevalent mainstream stuff, especially tied to streaming, is all left-wing trash. A lot of the core gamers who just want to play games with their friends are probably slightly conservative leaning and a huge reason for this is women. Gamers are often rejected by women when they're younger which tends to redpill a lot of the guys and they start to question the mainstream leftist narrative. This is also why feminists specifically target gaming so much because of this clash with the men and women in gaming. A lot of the major game producers are no different than hollywood in trying to write leftist propaganda into their games.

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's only because those black countries with black leaders were oppressed by white people. We need centuries to even the playing field.

Then ask them what happened with China then?

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

The way you breakup the 1% is you increase competition by deregulation, lowering taxes, reducing all redistribution spending, reducing the power of IP laws and making it easier to start a competing business. The left ideology is literally what monopolies do to cement their power by destroying the ability for anyone to compete.

3
UnemployedMarx 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can't wait for it all to come crumbling down. The civilization is absolute garbage and has been since WWII.

3
UnemployedMarx 3 points ago +3 / -0

The era of big government is over. The era of fascist government and corporate merging to form a total mega merging of morality, politics and economics into the ultimate despot has just begun...

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't disagree but it isn't optimal not just from the kids facing indoctrination perspective but from the family's perspective as well. The traditional 1 man working, 1 woman staying home is the optimal family structure.

If you're a devote Catholic and send your kids to Satanist church, you can counter the teachings of the Satanist Church to your Catholic children by also exposing your children to Catholicism etc... But not all experiences are worthwhile. Do you send your kids to Satanist Church, a Mosque, a Synagogue etc...? No, because you understand you can't expose someone to everything and that some things are better than others. While I don't disagree you can deprogram a person exposed to the cultural propaganda at public school, it's just better for everyone involved, if kids don't even go.

3
UnemployedMarx 3 points ago +3 / -0

Classical liberals which is what the majority of Trump supporters are, also opposed Hitler. But yeah, Hitler's Nazis were better than today's woke-ism.

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not new. This community was much better back in March/April of last year before it became popular but its downfall wasn't the destruction of the URL but rather its popularity. I noticed a change around summer time but it was still slight. Leading up until the election, the quality of content really decreased. It went from discussing the cultural war our society is in from a philosophical aspect citing great sources to "the plan"; guys posting twitter links of "the military watched the election, we won!" This degradation of the community went on for months until the 20th. I do believe without a doubt that leftists targeted this site with bots to disrupt the community. I even posted "keywords" and had auto-responses from obvious bots that hardly made sense on topics to prove to others that bots were in high use on this website. Guys like me who've been here for a year almost every day did move on but that's mostly because I finished discussing what I came here to discuss. I have things figured out, it's time to take the battle elsewhere. The community has lost any use for me really. It was useful to follow news and discuss what was going on in society so I could be better versed for political discussion among peers. Now though, Trump lost and the debate is over. I already know what I need to know. A bunch of news about Biden fucking over the world, leftists regretting their votes and how anti-white male is back on the agenda isn't news to me. I already know it. Like I said, call me when the revolution happens, until then, it's time to focus on other things. I'm sure others think similar to what I do.

10
UnemployedMarx 10 points ago +11 / -1

Probably because Trump isn't the president so most people are checking out of politics. I used to be on here daily like all the time. Now I'm hardly on here. Politics don't matter. Biden is fucking everything up. No one with power has any ability or will to stop him. Call me when the revolution starts but until then my focus is elsewhere. I imagine that's how most people feel.

1
UnemployedMarx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Morality must be taught and enforced through discipline, otherwise it is lost.

4
UnemployedMarx 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds more obedient than retarded. Many women have replaced men with the State. Instead of being submissive obedient wives to their husbands they are now submissive obedient citizens of the State. Ironic that for all women's independence, many have really only switched who their masters are.

3
UnemployedMarx 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not actually a word salad. Most of all the words add to the meaning of the paragraph.

If you want a summary: It's because you and them have two different and incompatible moral value systems because we live in a society where each individual thinks morality is whatever they feel like yet they act like their sense of morality is the only correct one. When two people argue with two different moral value systems but think the other person's moral value system is the same as their own then arguments become irrational.

7
UnemployedMarx 7 points ago +7 / -0

Unfortunately: "It’s Easier to Fool People Than to Convince Them That They Have Been Fooled"

Many people will admit Biden was a mistake because they voted for Biden to oust Trump more than actually voting for Biden but to get them to admit they were wrong about Trump is too much for many people to handle. They'll just wait for a new politician to latch onto then truly accept how grave their error was.

146
UnemployedMarx 146 points ago +146 / -0

Perhaps the tax isn't about anything other than an excuse to track people.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›