90
Uvuvhchcycyx 90 points ago +91 / -1

I saw a post on Facebook saying that black lives matter was a terrorist organization and PolitiFact literally fact checked it and said that they weren't listed as a terrorist organization by the FBii

what we need to do though is the same thing for Joe Biden.. every single statement he makes we need to fact-check regardless of whether it's hyperbolic or not.. Make it out like biden is the biggest liar in the worl

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need to get computer sevvy teams together to doxx these fucks like they do to us

2
Uvuvhchcycyx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Speak up.. You can't expect people to agree with you if you don't speak up..

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. Its all partbof the plan..

The best place for him to catch the swamp is from prison. Wich is why he wanted to go undercover and pretend to get arrested so he could catch them from the insidee

12
Uvuvhchcycyx 12 points ago +12 / -0

Republicans are all talk.. remember how for years they said they wanted to repeal Obamacare and then they got the house the Senate and the presidency and suddenly they couldn't do it?.

56
Uvuvhchcycyx 56 points ago +57 / -1

The why were the antifa terrorists not arrested for carrying guns and running through a crowd holding one?.

11
Uvuvhchcycyx 11 points ago +11 / -0

Its Political persecutionn

9
Uvuvhchcycyx 9 points ago +9 / -0

Kyle Rittenhouse stopped terrorists who crossed state lines carrying guns and explosives with the intent to bomb buildings and shoot ppll

one of those terrorists ran out of a crowd brandishing a gun.. He stopped the active shooter

3
Uvuvhchcycyx 3 points ago +4 / -1

I don't want the GOP in charge.. I'm not going to vote for them to be in charge because I don't agree with their policies..

Rino policies are bad..

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Laws are not enforced (unless it's against white people)

is why we need people in charge that will fire all of the corrupt people in the FBI rather than keeping them on for 4 yea

giant corporations control the government politicians are bought

is why we need more laws keeping money out of politics.. less citizens United and more FEC regulations..

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

What part of section 230 should be enforced?.

I know you're probably mentioned something about platforms and publishers but if you actually read section 230 there's not a single part of it that even has the word "platform"" in it

I know. It's shocking that Ted Cruz might lie about something to achieve his goals.. The guy that called Donald Trump a racist and refused to endorse him after the primaries being dishonest?. Shocking..

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are plenty of ways to regulate social media.. You can take a page out of Obama's book into the tried-and-true method of declaring social media to be a public utility and therefore cannot send her things.. You could have chosen three Supreme Court Justice is that agreed that social media was a public square.. those are just examples.. There's multiple ways to deal with the problem directly.. publicans were trying to do with deal with the problem in directly by going through a bunch of bulshit things and hoping that the courts agree with them so that they can basically use and are relevant law to blackmail social media into doing what they want.. and that's not necessarily stopping censorship either.. Just blackmailing them into doing anything they want.. Which is pretty dangerous..

imagine the government with with complete control over social media because they have that black male?.. A single lgmmmmbbbh stating that they can't censor people wouldn't give the government that same kind of control.. But that's not what they want. They want control and that's why they're pushing the section 230 bulshit instead of much better methods

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are plenty of ways to regulate social media.. You can take a page out of Obama's book into the tried-and-true method of declaring social media to be a public utility and therefore cannot send her things.. You could have chosen three Supreme Court Justice is that agreed that social media was a public square.. those are just examples.. There's multiple ways to deal with the problem directly.. publicans were trying to do with deal with the problem in directly by going through a bunch of bulshit things and hoping that the courts agree with them so that they can basically use and are relevant law to blackmail social media into doing what they want.. and that's not necessarily stopping censorship either.. Just blackmailing them into doing anything they want.. Which is pretty dangerous..

2
Uvuvhchcycyx 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what they'll be saying when they're up for re-electionn

4
Uvuvhchcycyx 4 points ago +6 / -2

If thats ur best argument then id say its a good ideaa

1
Uvuvhchcycyx 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you keep watching TV? Why are you so addicted to tv?

1
deleted 1 point ago +9 / -8
-17
Uvuvhchcycyx -17 points ago +3 / -20

So do 2.5 billion other people worldwide..

You're actually weird if you DON'T use Facebook because you'd be in the minorityy

Edit: sorry commies- but "average" is defined as what MOST people do

So if most people use Facebook- then its normal. Wich means its NOT average to stop using Facebookk

view more: Next ›