6
Uwjuebs 6 points ago +6 / -0

And what we forget, is the only reason we know about this is because that black dude beat the shit out of that old guy. And someone asked, why was he there instead of the mental health facility. Their answer, "he had covid" so they transferred him. If they weren't caught early on, this would have been buried.

7
Uwjuebs 7 points ago +7 / -0

If this is what they're admitting to... how far did it really go? If what they have listed is justifiable to preserve the democracy, is there anything they wouldn't do?

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden was doing a bunch of shit that pisses off everyone. She was always going to be the fall guy. Her job was to not answer questions and piss everyone off until she had to resign...just so long as the biden administration didn't have to go on record saying shit to defend what he's doing and hope everyone forgets.

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was down for a little while, but it's back now and entertaining as hell. If you previously joined you should be able to see it even though it's now private.

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Spelling isn't my strong suit. And I'm drunk.. so

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not as serious of an offense as being indigo, the banished color from the rainbow.

0
Uwjuebs 0 points ago +2 / -2

When people are trader's, you treat them like trader's. That's what we need right now. Not an emperor appeasing the helpless masses.

-11
Uwjuebs -11 points ago +7 / -18

If we're going to compare Trump to anyone for what he's about to do, it should be Cicero from when he was consul. He executed Roman citizens quickly and w/o trial for trying to overthrow the republic.

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Octavian was pro Cicero when the 2nd triumvirate executed Cicero. I can only assume you're calling Antony, Caesar. Which isn't who we want to compare trump to. Cicero is comparable to Turtleneck because he was too old and too loyal to tradition to be included in the assassination of Julius Caesar.

0
Uwjuebs 0 points ago +1 / -1

What's with the anti cicero stuff all of a sudden?

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't disagree. But let's say in the off chance Trump pulls this off and we want to return to a system of laws.

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not a negative, it's proving a positive. Htf can you have an election and not be able to prove the results?

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's joe fucking biden, i think he knows all about the wealth of the rothschilds

0
Uwjuebs 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's really easy in this case, Biden (not literally Biden) has to prove that each ballot counted was a legal ballot. The evidence that can conclusively prove it is there, but they're destroying it.

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

The paper ballots are printed by the machine, they're not ballots filled out and then inserted. There are no original paper ballots.

3
Uwjuebs 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's the reason he put the gun on the table right there

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the Democrats are on track to maintain control of the house. I don't get why ppl on here keep using this "he gained house seats" argument. We need to show that R's WON the house to let ppl know it's plausible that Trump won. Which they're doing- but the op argument takes the msm numbers, accepts them and gives a flawed argument that would make it seem like a Trump victory was implausible since the house elections are much closer to the electoral college than the senate.

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's all over Michigan- all Detroit zip codes start 482. Why are we spreading the part that's disputable with a 5 second glance?

2
Uwjuebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you know which ballots to recount in that situation?

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wish it had been presented accurately. Such as: why does Michigan (3% of the US population) have 14,000 people over 100 on the voter rolls (20% of people over 100 in the US)?

23
Uwjuebs 23 points ago +23 / -0

I tried 5 names, all were registered but only one, Ruth Suart, 1919, January, 49546 had voted. I looked her up online and no obituaries for michigan. According to beenverified.com she is still alive. Also, these names are from all over Michigan, not just Wayne County.

1
Uwjuebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

I tried 5 names, all were registered but only one, Ruth Suart, 1919, January, 49546 had voted. I looked her up online and no obituaries for michigan. According to beenverified.com she is still alive.

view more: Next ›