I just loaded it on mobile and it still worked for me. You can take a look at the one I posted yesterday if you can't get the nypost one to load still.
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/c/
Link to my thread the other day: https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/c/
Update to my post yesterday (includes some interesting points being made by other pedes in the comments) where I came across a lower-quality of the footage that was included in this article & I still come to the same conclusion... I'm trying to understand how anyone could write an article about this with the footage included and not point out how the blast doesn't seem to originate from the RV?
Thanks for posting the link! I was just about to come back here & post it myself. It looks promising but I'm still going through it. One anon brought-up a noteworthy point. How was this able to include evidence from sealed CISA warrants unless Sydney was appointed as a special counsel?
I'm not too familiar with how that system works so I actually don't have any idea...
Yes... coupled with that video that a pede posted earlier that shows the plume of smoke when watched at 0.25x speed, there is something going on here?
Look between the lightposts during the first several seconds.
But I just can't see it originating from the RV... I mean it seems to come from/recede into the white car on the right... not the RV which is parked a ways down the street behind the car and on the opposite side of the street.
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
Have you seen this footage yet?
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
Yeah, have you seen this footage yet? I acquired it earlier and haven't seen it posted anywhere other than where I've posted it since then and it is really bugging me/feels like an important detail...
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
I acquired this video earlier and haven't seen it posted other than by myself, but I'm trying to get opinions on why the blast doesn't even seem to be coming from the RV... its really bugging me and I'd like to get some opinions on it & spread it around.
As you're someone who seems to know about how car-bombs typically look could you give me your opinion on this video of the blast?
I acquired it earlier and haven't seen it posted, but I'm trying to spread it around because A. it seems important & B. I have yet to hear an explanation for why the explosion doesn't appear to be coming from the RV (which is parked down the street and on the opposite side).
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
Do you have a link for the video?
I don't know about the lady but I had kinda figured it was this cop as he is right there when it blows. Also can anyone explain why the blast doesn't appear to come from the RV... which is down the street on the opposite side?
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
Which video is that? I acquired video elsewhere earlier that I haven't seen posted and I'm trying to spread it around because I haven't found a plausible reason for this, but for the life of me I just can't see the blsst coming from the RV... which is parked down the street and on the opposite side of the street from the blast.
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
That was what I was thinking. I was under the impression that C4/similar explosives can't be detonated without a detonator?
So if they had access to a significant amount of C4 wouldn't that indicate deepstate/alphabet agencies doing some fuckery? Because I doubt anyone outside of those agencies or the military could manage to get their hands on that quantity of such a controlled/advanced explosive...
Oh I see what you mean, several people pointed that out here and in other threads but I couldn't tell what they were trying to point out, the screenshot really helps thanks! But the blast definitely recedes into about where the white car is located? Just a thought but would the light generated by a rocket, like a hellfire missile's propulsion system, be enough to generate the light seen initially to 'blind' the camera prior to impacting/detonating?
An anon on /pol/ who seemed to know his stuff said that any sort of switchboard/server-rooms would be located around the 7th to 8th floors, with cables running into and out of the subterranean portion of the structure structure.
Plus after seeing the video in my thread below it doesn't even appear that the blast even originated from the RV... this one just keeps getting weirder. The RV is like down the street and parked on the opposite side of the street to where the explosion originates.
https://thedonald.win/p/11RNomhCQJ/do-you-see-what-im-seeing-any-in/
If the rocket theory is correct, would say a Hellfire missile produce enough light while flying towards its target to 'blind' the camera? Because the explosion definitely recedes into about where the white car is located, but if the propulsion system of a rocket was bright enough to blind the camera that could explain it seemingly not appearing to start at the white car?
To the extent that I know about explosives (a modest amount) yes. Just a thought but if the rocket theory is correct (a video when slowed down showed a smoke-trail going into the buildings a split-second before the blast, plus a military pede posted a convincing argument stating that the blast was inconsistent with car-bombs) would say, a Hellfire missile produce enough light from the rocket prior to detonating to 'blind' the camera?
Operating on the premise that it was rocket wouldn't that mean they wanted to A. disable telecoms B. destroy something stored within the building C. attempt to prevent something that one side was there to sieze from getting out?
I haven't seen any indication or really much speculation about it being CIA, unless I missed something? NSA yes, that seems to be more than likely the case.