The Kraken dropped and it was pretty damning (if somewhat messy). Maybe Sidney Powell could have done a better job with it but ultimately the corrupt judiciary is to blame for that case not going anywhere.
As for Flynn's assurances though... Yeah, maybe he should do some soul searching.
You might ignore them, but they won't ignore you. They'll continue to consolidate and expand their power, and eventually they'll come for you.
I'm just saying that people like that exist and these are really extraordinary claims. If it's confirmed then great, hopefully the crackdown is coming. But be cautious.
Unfortunately there are people with mental conditions who firmly believe that they've been targeted, stalked, tortured etc. even though nothing happened to them. Without some corroborating witnesses or documents confirming these statements, I think these claims are too extraordinary to believe.
Yeah, I mean I understand if you can't share evidence from an ongoing investigation, but at least do the Wikileaks thing of spreading an encrypted file with a key that will be released if you get taken out. Even that isn't as good as being able to see the evidence itself but at least it would inspire some confidence.
Two years? A few days would be enough to cause massive chaos.
It needs a clear demand to go along with it though: Give us a fair trial. Let the evidence be presented and the witnesses be heard. No dismissal or summary judgement, there needs to be a discovery phase, and the presidency is on the line.
Strike for a day, then two days, then four days, and so on until they give in.
As far as I'm aware none of the documents released contain any specifics regarding China interfering with the election, unfortunately. Ratcliffe believes they intended to and criticizes the CIA for (successfully) suppressing the rest of the intelligence community but nothing was released about what China actually did.
You can ignore them, but they won't ignore you. They won't stop until you have nothing left. If Trump leaves office on the 20th, then it's up to the people to do something about the corruption.
Yeah I know someone with a compromised immune system who was also fine after a few days. But it's not complete nonsense - a certain percentage of people seem to get something similar to an allergic reaction, where their immune system goes into overdrive and makes things worse. Those are the people who end up in IC wards. Does that justify lockdowns that kill more people than they save? Obviously not. But there's a middle ground here between the authoritarian nonsense that politicians are foisting on us and completely ignoring it.
Well, if it helps I can confirm that this happened because I watched it happen on the night of the election.
I think the deboonkers claimed that this was a data entry error - that some district had missed a digit, so a whole lot of votes got added when they fixed the error. However from what we now know of the process, the data entry is all done by machines - the data is just transferred using USB sticks and over the Internet.
In addition I think this was the district where witnesses reported a truck coming in, which everyone initially thought was delivering food, but which instead contained thousands upon thousands of ballots in boxes and duffel bags. But don't quote me on either of those things, because there were a lot of shenanigans in a lot of different places.
I don't know what exactly happened here, but as others are saying it was released in exactly this form before (redactions and everything) about a month ago.
This was released back in December, around the 13th as the date at the top implies. Dominion CEO said it was very biased and contains false information (during a hearing in... Arizona? I think it was Arizona, maybe Georgia), without ever going into detail of course, and there was never any follow-up.
Maybe, but remember that having a higher IQ isn't equivalent to having a better handle on the truth. People with a higher IQ are also better at lying to themselves (just look at all the leftist academics).
The reason that universal suffrage usually works out is that even if they can't articulate their reasoning, people usually still have decent gut instincts. It's just that right now, for a lot of people that instinct is being subverted by a constant barrage of media propaganda.
IIRC like 17% of early Biden voters said they wouldn't have voted for him if they'd known about the corruption scandal. Besides, they should be welcome if they're at least open to the idea that the election was stolen and the result should be overturned (better if they already believe, but we all know how much the media have done to hide the evidence).
Looks like New York Times to me. All of them got their data from the same source though (via Scytl).
Technically yes, but a lot of it is probably unrelated.
For example in Germany, Merkel is stepping down as party leader after 4 terms but she's not stepping down as Chancellor. In the Netherlands, Rutte is resigning over a scandal involving people getting incorrectly taxed for child benefits, but elections were already planned for March anyway.
Maybe there's more to some of the others, but a bunch of these are just suggestive timing.
before the first Trump supporters arrived as no supporter would leave before the end of the speech
Nah, most of the people at the Capitol were Trump supporters who didn't attend the speech or left early. I know a few people who were there and confirm this. That doesn't change the fact that there were Antifa instigators mixed in with a clear plan to cause as much violence and destruction as possible to make Trump look bad, nor does it mean that Trump instigated what happened.
DeKalb county still sat on their vote count for most of the day as I recall - stuck at 37% for ages, probably figuring out how much they had to make up for.
The House can impeach whenever they want, but this just throws it to the Senate to examine the evidence. The Senate then votes to remove the President from office, which requires a 2/3 majority. Should that vote pass, they can then vote on whether he should be barred from running again, which requires a simple majority.
Just so we're clear:
inciting
he didn't incite entering the Capitol
armed
they weren't armed
insurrection
it wasn't an insurrection
I've heard people calling it a "raid". That's still not entirely accurate but I think it's a lot closer than "riot".
Yeah, that downside is a problem. Still, even if only people in red counties participate, that would already be a lot of critical infrastructure suspended.
I would demand a trial on the election fraud. The social media stuff is bad but still secondary. Demand a discovery phase and demand a trial where the evidence is presented and the witnesses are heard. Dismissal or summary judgement is unacceptable in this case. There also needs to be a judge involved in this because the contested states can't be trusted with audits.
Organizing something before the 20th might be difficult, though in my opinion it would be ideal. I'm worried about what people are going to do if nothing else has happened by the 20th or the 21st.
My question for people railing against Q is: What would you have done differently if it wasn't for Q? Would it have prevented the fraud? Would there have been more rallies? Protests? Would people have brought firearms into DC?
Yeah there are people who buy into everything Q and I don't know what they're going to do when all their deadlines have passed and none of it has come through. But the hopium they've produced? It's just helped keep people from getting blackpilled.
Now let's say nothing happens between now and the 20th and we have to decide what to do going forward: Sure, discard Q, figure out a realistic way forward and do it. But until then, I really don't think it makes much difference.
I removed the right channel (jet engine) and applied some noise reduction. Here's what I got:
Trump: I think that Big Tech is doing a horrible thing for our country and to our country, and I believe it's going to be a catastrophic mistake for them. They're dividing and divisive and they're showing something that I've been predicting for a long time. I've been predicting it for a long time - and people didn't act on it - but I think Big Tech has made a terrible mistake, and very very bad for our country, and that's leading others to do the same thing. And it causes a lot of problems and a lot of danger. Big mistake, they shouldn't be doing it, but there's always a counter move when they do that; I've never seen such anger as I see right now, and that's a terrible thing - terrible thing - and you have to always avoid violence and we have tremendous support. We have support, probably like nobody's ever seen before; always have to avoid violence.
Journo: What is your role in what happened at the Capitol, what is your personal responsibility?
Trump: So if you read my speech - and many people have done it and I've seen it both in the papers, in the media, on television - it's been analyzed and people thought that what I said was totally appropriate; and if you look at what other people have said - politicians at a high level - about the riots during the summer, the horrible riots in Portland and Seattle and various other places: that was the real problem, what they said. But they've analyzed my speech and my words and my final paragraph, my final sentence, and everybody to the T thought it was totally appropriate.
So the left ushering in an era of tyranny is part of God's plan but good Christians on the right securing a better future for their children is not? All it takes for evil to win is for good men to do nothing.