According to Lin, he's in Texas - Check his Parler account
Please read the message below carefully. We have ONE President at a time. Our President is Donald J. Trump. When President Trump speaks, listen carefully.
So while congress is on capital hill committing treason surrounded by the military who is "helping them" by Pences orders; Trumps in Texas at the command center watching... You think if the military didn't have his back he would be there? or escaped Washington on AF1 Sect. Of Defense is playing Pence and Congress; waiting for them to finish the crime.
- A plane that took off from DC at 5pm that looks like AF1 https://globe.adsbexchange.com/?icao=adfeb6
The source is The Hill., so I'm not sure this is super credible, here's the link anyways https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/532273-pence-asks-judge-to-toss-gop-lawmakers-bid-to-overturn-election
Vice President Pence on Thursday asked a federal judge to reject a bid by Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) and other Republicans to broaden Pence’s powers in a manner that would effectively allow him to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s electoral win.
The lawsuit, filed earlier this week, seeks to expand Pence’s role in an upcoming Jan. 6 meeting of Congress to count states’ electoral votes and finalize Biden’s victory over President Trump.
But in a Thursday brief to Texas-based U.S. District Judge Jeremy Kernodle, a Trump appointee, Pence said he was not a proper defendant to the suit.
“A suit to establish that the Vice President has discretion over the count, filed against the Vice President, is a walking legal contradiction,” a Department of Justice attorney representing Pence wrote in the filing.
Typically, the vice president’s role in presiding over the Jan. 6 meeting is a largely ceremonial one governed by an 1887 federal law known as the Electoral Count Act.
But the Republican lawsuit seeks to invalidate the law as an unconstitutional constraint on the vice president's authority to choose among competing claims of victory when state-level election results are disputed.
The Supreme Court has not met in person for months due to the covid.
The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/ma_10-22-20
Story is BS
The Supreme Court has not met in person for months due to the covid.
The Court will hear all oral arguments scheduled for the November and December sessions by telephone conference. In keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19, the Justices and counsel will all participate remotely. The oral arguments are scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. On days when more than one case will be heard, there will be a three minute pause before the second case begins.>
https://www.supremecourt.gov/publicinfo/press/pressreleases/ma_10-22-20
Perfect LOL