It’s not fake. The baby that this woman miscarried was to be her second child. That’s why she mentions Eva—her first baby, who she successfully delivered—in the second tweet. Eva would have been the kid’s big sister.
Also, that’s not her in the pic (the baby there is much older and the woman much thinner—not sure why pic of another person was used).
Just clearing these points up, because the random details that don’t match can make people understandably suspicious. I’ve been following Alex Berenson closely on twitter. He’s about the only one who has been probing original sources—VAERS data, other countries’ stats and even firsthand accounts from OBs—tracking how very dangerous this vaccine is for pregnant women. There have been a not insignificant amount of post-first trimester stillbirths and miscarriages, which in general are usually quite rare.
The machines switching votes—or rather, people using the machines to mass-adjudicate and switch vote as well as using satellites and algorithms to change totals—was not a focus. Giuliani didn’t put it in any lawsuits. None of the main campaign lawyers (Rudy, Jenna, Boris) discussed it on the press circuit.
Everything you listed was discussed, and was the focus.
The switching of votes was not bullshit, also. Why are you using such strong language, as if you’re not even on our side?
Brilliantly stated. I'm also heartened to see you haven't eaten any downvotes on this take.
Also, don't forget how CodeMonkeyZ posted screenshots of his correspondence with Parler support, wherein they literally used the phrase "don't be butthurt." Very odd amateur vibes.
You’re right. I’ve noticed this too. You’ve summarized it very astutely. Pay no attention to the poster arguing with you — I’m pretty sure that’s a shill/fed, and s/he must be very nervous about their playbook being exposed.
Oh, absolutely.
Didn’t mention it in my post, but if you check the TCM schedule for Thursday and Friday (the days after Inauguration), there’s some extremely weird stuff there as well. Stuff about woman, wife, etc.
Hillary?! Michelle? Oprah? (Something about “richest woman” in the movies they have scheduled)
Great point. And they always seem to be radicalized “lone wolves” who often conveniently die during the incident.
I’m just horrified at what they plan to do to Trump supporters afterward if they can pull off this narrative where “guy in a MAGA hat” kills beloved Biden.
Oh, absolutely. I’m just being very straightforward with my words since we have “fans” in the misleadia and among federal agencies.
No Trump supporters wants a Biden assassination. Full stop.
We all know he’s a puppet anyway; killing him would make him a martyr, demonize our entire movement and not even get rid of any corruption or bad policies he stands for anyway.
PROTECT JOE and SPREAD THE WORD about this frame job!!
Absolutely. Pre-priming the normies that this was a legit assassination by a Trump-supporting zealot (give me a break!). Possibly also a go-signal to any fringe figures not integral to the operation?
This is terrifying. They’ve already used the “another 9/11” terminology with the Capitol incident. They want to make “Patriot” synonymous with “terrorist” now.
Stole this from GW.win.
PLEASE PLEASE NOTE, CBS and glowies: We are not calling for violence against anyone. In fact we want Biden to be fully protected.
Check the TCM (Turner Classic Movies — founded by CNN founder Ted Turner) schedule for Inauguration Day, Wednesday, 1/20.
What in the HELL is going on? This obviously isn’t an accident. It seems obvious it’s a signal.
We DO NOT want anything to happen to Biden. NOBODY WANTS THIS. PROTECT HIM.
Seems pretty obvious something is being plotted, and it’s going to be pinned on a MAGA hat-wearing, Pepe gear-loving, Q-quoting “Trump supporter.”
After which they’ll grab the guns and label all Trump supporters TERRORISTS.
Spread this. “Predictive Programming.” Whoever has such a nefarious thing planned has infinite resources to make it happen. The table is already set: “Biden fears for his safety and has to vet the National Guard troops!”
What they can’t handle is us cutting them off at the knees by calling this obvious op out beforehand as the false flag that it is.
WE WANT BIDEN FULLY PROTECTED. Full stop. Nobody here wants a single thing to happen to him physically.
Understandable. Look at all the naysaying comments flooding into this thread right now. (I won't call them "d00mer" because that will trigger the bots.)
Infiltrators want to kill all hope. Stay realistic, prepare for the worst ... but entertaining some hope is OK.
What on earth are you talking about?
This is a new level of just straight up lying. It was a live video. Maybe no nefarious reason for blackout (seems unlikely), but it was blacked out for hours.
LoL, pivoting from the previous deboonk of "it was just an underexposed camera shot," are we?
Noticed the same thing.
Was on the Trump email list. Last week, suddenly the "from" part changed from Pres Trump (or sometimes it was Lara Trump or Melania Trump or DT Jr., I get it -- it's marketing), to the very weird entity: "CNN SAID WHAT!?" (<--Note the exclamation came before the question mark, hah, a random pet peeve.)
I realized this was a very poor and pathetic attempt to mimic Trump's inimitable voice. It's like they took what some GOP limp noodle thought was what we like about Trump ("He calls out CNN!") and offer some watered down simulacrum of it. Like a Trump veneer over a swampy GOP shit sandwich.
Even worse, the scums hid the unsubscribe button by removing the blue underline link format in the footer -- possibly an CAN-SPAM violation, I'd think -- and then there was a "if you have feedback, click here" button, which rather than letting me give them a piece of my mind, took me to a dumb shit survey, which again tried and failed to mimic Trump's charisma, with no text box for me to type my input.
Shady and shitty. They have no idea how much the people are NOT with them. The old Republican party is completely non-viable at this point. They should be very, very scared.
This is an excellent point. The bad actors in this forum try too hard with the screen names. Some general categories I've seen:
- 1776/patriot/Washington
- GEOTUS/TrumpIsGod/MAGAForeverAndEver, etc.
- GlowieKiller, FedGuy, JustAnotherFBI
- KEK, Pepe
Yes, I might sound crazy, because those are theoretically screen names you'd imagine that "real" pedes would have. But again, in my vast experience (and with some exceptions, of course), there's a whole lot of shill/bot/glow coming off the comments from people with these types of names. Just my observation.
You’re truly doing the Lord’s work responding to people on good faith like this. Thank you. You’ve cheered and encouraged me. I know you’ve done the same for others.
In casting up this dread balance-sheet, contemplating our dangers with a disillusioned eye, I see great reason for intense vigilance and exertion, but none whatever for panic or despair. During the first four years of the last war the Allies experienced,...nothing but disaster and disappointment, and yet at the end their morale was higher than that of the Germans, who had moved from one aggressive triumph to another. During that war we repeatedly asked ourselves the question, "How are we going to win?" and no one was able ever to answer it with much precision, until at the end, quite suddenly, quite unexpectedly, our terrible foe collapsed before us. —Churchill
Your words are beautiful and full of truth. I have no idea why you’re getting any downvotes with a hopeful (yet realistic) earnest message. But even people who click the down arrow have heard your hope and it will marinate in their minds. If they’re really on our side, that hope will bubble back up in their darkest hour.
Remember that when Pandora opened the box and all the awful evil stuff floated into the world, the last thing that came out was hope — and it’s forever in this world too, a necessary counterforce to the evil we must always fight.
Someone mentioned in a post yesterday that his post/comment history from a period 20-29 days ago or something was completely wiped, and everyone who chimed in on the post said they’d noticed the same. Nobody could figure out what, if anything, this indicates.
FYI the woman on the left isn’t the same as the woman who wrote the tweets. The baby in that sono is much older than 14 weeks. Not sure what became of the woman in the pic and not saying I disagree with your general point, but just pointing it out.