2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

Efficiency for what? We were only supposed to stop the spread for two weeks to make sure we had enough hospital room.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, they took the opportunity provided by the mail-in ballots to cheat as much as it took to win. No matter how much Trump actually won by, the results would be a small Biden victory because they would produce however many votes were required.

Because Trump won so huge, it meant they had to create a lot of ballots, and this is why they got caught.

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think an equally-important question to ask is, wtf happened in 2020? If they have been working this mechanism for 14 years, why do we have all of this evidence now?

Certainly a big part of it is that Trump knew, because we well warned us ahead of time. Also, though, it's because he didn't let up and he won bigger than they could cheat without getting caught.

3
Vir4030 3 points ago +3 / -0

She doesn't even listen to her own "experts." Maskers do it as a sacrifice for others. Masks don't prevent you from catching it, they prevent you from asymptomatically spreading it... I mean, that's what they used to say.

Now they say there's no such thing as asymptomatic spreading?

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

If it's the People vs the Establishment, guess which side she's on?

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many liberals are there on the Supreme Court?

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

There's a much easier explanation.

I get random followers on Twitter from time to time that are revealingly-dressed women with no tweet history. I always immediately block them.

There are lots of people who subscribe to the "follow back" policy, and follow anyone that follows them back by reflex.

Someone on Crenshaw's staff accidentally followed one of these people back.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because it helps them win.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

In their dissent, they say that the government's effort to remove aliens without lawful status from the census violates decades of historical practice is true. Aliens have been included, but marked as such and not used for apportionment.

The dissent, however, then incorrectly equates the two, saying that it is unlawful to remove them from the apportionment base. The truth is that they were always removed from the base until Obama changed the rules. i.e. the Democrats cheated.

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which two of the five constitutional justices are you calling liberal now?

2
Vir4030 2 points ago +2 / -0

That database is at least three months old, is less than 2 million CCP members, and all entries are Chinese people living in China.

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

FYI, they can meet and do that right now.

50
Vir4030 50 points ago +50 / -0

Obama gave one speech about it at the University of Chicago while he was the sitting President. Cruz was an adjunct professor and taught it for five years. Big difference!

1
Vir4030 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was just filed today, so the paperwork probably isn't immediate. It sounds like they will, but hasn't happened yet.

view more: Next ›