Women should not be in high risk jobs like police or fire. This is why. If they want to be paper pushers and just answer phones and file paperwork then that's different, but they should not be out on patrols or responding to alerts. Yes, it would push out the fractional percent of the tiny percent of all women that could do it because they're butch lesbians, but better that than more and more of this nonsense.
Or do you think that intentionally lower standards are a good thing when lives are on the line?
You know those women that "work" at a construction site but only ever handle the "slow/stop" sign? About that level of work.
And the media will blast positive story after positive story about it while playing up the "this will help with all the issues people have with credit reporting!" line to sucker people into it.
Do I like the credit bureau's? No. I think they're an unmitigated disaster that is not held accountable for their actions. They can fuck up your credit score and you have to sue them to actually get any movement in a decent time frame. Do I trust them more than I do the government? You're damn right, especially with communists in control of the government now. We already saw what they did with the IRS under Obama without as much control as they have now. This would be immeasurably worse.
They show patience until they think they have either won by corrupting and controlling enough systems or have been discovered and fear they will be removed. That's when they move quickly and recklessly to consolidate things.
They key words there are "over time." Yes, over time things will stabilize and their ability to manipulate goes down. That's not what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about something like the massive selloff and crash of the Great Depression a century ago where the plebs sold off as much as they could to get something back which led to a giant spiral downwards which, when it was over, left those with money able to scoop up massive gains and makes ridiculous profits from all the "worthless" stock they bought up as the market recovered.
The same thing is going to happen here. Bitcoin with start crashing, people will panic sell, and the rich will snicker and buy up the now utterly cheap coins in ridiculous quantities giving them more control than they otherwise would have had. Eventually enough time will have passed so that the common folk could buy back in at a fractional amount of what they could have had if they never sold off, but the damage is already done and the corrupt get what they wanted, and caused to happen, in the first place.
You already can be fired for that if your companies HR department is like a normal HR and stuffed full of karens and quota hires. The stories of what happens to guys in companies that the women working there don't like for whatever reason are downright terrifying.
They're all over the internet, there's even some that find their way here once in a while. It's always fun watching a "libertarian" use the exact same tactics as a marxist all while claiming they aren't one.
It's playing chess with a pigeon. It'll eventually get bored of randomly moving pieces around out of turn, shit all over the board, and fly off leaving you looking stupid for trying.
Now do circumcision. It's a practice that was only created for when we couldn't properly clean ourselves and needs to be done away with since we now can.
If you would screech about slicing off a girl's clitoral hood then you should equally screech about slicing off a boy's foreskin. Genital mutilation of any kind is wrong.
The problem isn't that it will crash. The problem is with the people pushing globalism causing that crash to then buy up as much as they can as people panic sell to then control the "new" money supply as other fiat is phased out.
As with everything, the core system isn't the problem. Humans being greedy fucksticks is.
And the opposite of what bitcoin was supposed to be, but a very clear sign of what it's been positioned to become and do.
I saw one of the hotels they called a "barracks" in South Korea. Utterly unbelievable.
As usual, government doesn't like the people it rules over. The israeli government loves starting shit with every country around them and the citizens end up paying for it.
"Tax", not fine. That was the loophole they used. It's fine to tax someone for something, but not to impose a punitive fine.
I don't even understand hwo no-knock raids are even legal.
The argument to allow them was that it was "necessary" to prevent certain suspects from either being able to muster a defense or to make an escape. The reality of why they actually wanted it was, as usual, far different.
They can't go two days without doing something to fuck with the countries around them and then they'll cry for the US to step in and protect them.
Then I hope you never expect help in that task. If you are going to ignore everything else but the part that affects you personally then you deserve to be ignored and left to fend for yourselves.
Enjoy drowning in the mess you've created for yourselves. You absolutely deserve what happens to you.
Trying to? They already were in control when I was in. All the top brass were as left as you could get and mysteriously the truly hardworking that would have done good things never got past certain rank thresholds because they didn't sell out and play the game to get promoted.
Then the media would have run with the "TRUMP IS AN ANTISEMITE!" line. It doesn't matter that soros isn't religious and is just hiding behind a word that he just barely qualifies as due to who he can trace his linage back to, he gets to happily cause chaos and destroy the west while being protected as a "jew."
So in those "action plans" are you also going to make it clear you understand that you also need to be out of male only spaces and stop pushing into those while demanding that women keep their spaces? Like how women demanded girls be allowed in the boy scouts but also demanded that boys not be allowed in the girl scouts? Or how men's clubs are being forced to allow women in, but women's clubs are being allowed to still exclude men?
If you are just pushing to get men out of your spaces but are still demanding women be allowed in men's spaces you are still part of the problem and nowhere in your post did you even acknowledge or address that part of mine. You did take time to make a note that you're "good looking, incredibly in shape, conservative women, I might add" because even now you gotta get in that "look! We're available!" crap.
"Feminism" is just female nature allowed to run rampant. It's why even "traditional" women still show various "feminist" tendencies. They're not using it to cover up anything, they're using it as an excuse to finally be open about what they want.
The people that get rich off wars and then the rebuilding efforts afterwards, with other people getting kickbacks for supporting and allowing it. Coincidentally, they're the same ones that push for the wars in the first place.
Air defense is no better. Short range is easy enough and they still sometimes screw up, but long range has some really interesting outcomes that should worry people.
They really want weimar back. This time they're just using minorities instead of doing it the more difficult way.
Would you be this upset if a male police officer confused a pistol and tazer and was about to have his life destroyed? Or would you hold the male to a higher standard to have his shit together and understand the difference between two different items in his kit?