'new government' will not happen. Not unless the people who would do such a thing get together in person to do so. Communicate in person. Organize in person. Stay away from websites like this if you're an actual activist. Browsing this website is as productive as watching youtube videos. It's not
Posts like this are how you know this site has outside propagandists lurking on it. Who the hell would write a post like this? Everyone knows the stance of this site on vaccines. If you were to differ, you would expect that to be reflected in the tone of the post.
"I know you guys don't want to hear this, but the Covid vaccine could be key to curing HIV" <- This is what you would expect. Instead, we get hype as if everyone here is already on board.
I'll say the same thing about Benford's law (concerning the first leading digit) here as I said when it was brought up initially.
Accountants use it to detect fraud on balance sheets where the numbers are all larger than 7 figures. Ideally 8 figures or larger is best. The reason is that the pattern described by Benfords law applied to the first leading digit only manifests when the numbers you're concerned with are that large. If the numbers you're talking are 10s of millions, fraudulent numbers will violate Benford's law. If the numbers are too small, that they violate Benford's law becomes meaningless.
This graphic does provide some great info on election improprieties that compromised the election though, so it's ultimately forgiveable.
Cancer is correlated strongly with inflammation, and inflammation is caused by free radicals found in deep-fried food or anything cooked at high temperatures.
With what Americans eat, it shouldn't surprise you they get a lot of cancer.
Interesting idea, but it only works if the gov is a neutral party. I'd only accept this if it meant that servers and datacenters were distributed across all 50 states, and the feds never got their hands on it. Personally the thought of Twitter being under control of leftists is still preferable IMO to Twitter being a government outlet. That's how social media works in China, and we all know how that's going.
Historically, there have been coup d'etats that have used the military in other countries, such as with Pinochet. That's hardly the scenario you want though. We weren't looking for a coup d'etat, we were looking for the election to be audited and the results corrected.
That the QAnon supporters wanted the military to intervene doesn't look good on them.
I should have started with 'I suspect'. Maybe you are looking shooting at ranges and doing protests. That's not what I typically associate with 'reaching out for support'. I was thinking along the lines of discussion.
As for speaking freely on the internet that's pretty much self-evident. When you have partial anonymity or full anonymity, people don't put as much pressure on themselves to say the right thing. They speak more freely. There's some research behind this, but it's pretty obvious to anyone who's been on the internet for long enough. I wager it's part of the reason 4chan is such a shithole lol.
Yeah I know, but when valid accusations are made, it's usually along the lines of 'you used the wrong kind of study' or 'why did you not use a control group?!'
You sorta have to know what a good study looks like to soundly knock that fact-check out of the park.
The Johnson and Johnson had some adverse short-term effects as well... idk what to say about that. It's all very unfamiliar to me. I've had vaccines for other things before, but it's always just a bit of muscle pain and sometimes some wooziness. One of my friends took a covid vaxx (not J&J I don't think) and he was throwing up violently for hours.
It's amazing how easy all that BS is to see through when you have some practice. The line about VAERS is a complete red herring.
If there was any evidence from VAERS, that would mean people with the new Prion disease would have have to report that disease as a consequence of a vaccine. They wouldn't know to do that, so they wouldn't. By the same token, if there was info on Prion disease from VAERS, that wouldn't be proof of the association either, for the same reason.
The only claim I can't quite refute from that fact-checker is when it quotes their expert claiming that the methodology of the paper cited is not rigorous enough. I haven't read the paper, so I can't make a judgement.
Right, but then nothing on this site really is. How many 'action needed' posts get stickied or widespread attention? And how many of those amount to little more than making phone calls?
If you know of CointelPro, then you'd know that the best way to derail a movement is 'slacktivism' whereby people think they're doing something productive when it reality they're doing nothing at all. If you want to make a real change stop browsing this website expecting that to work. And while you're at it, try to remember that if everyone did that, this site would only consist of memes and celebrating actual patriots, instead of pundits on Twitter.
Lockdown protests and shooting ranges are hardly what u/riesling was looking for I'm thinking...
There's also the fact that speaking with people in person generally means being less open about what you're thinking.
They think 'bear arms' are a part of a bear costume.