LYNN FORESTER DE ROTHSCHILD is a Founding and Managing Partner of Inclusive Capital Partners, an investment manager for the $1.5B Spring Fund, that seeks positively differentiated returns by deploying its governance skills and value investment discipline to improve environmental and societal performance of the business’ in which it invests. Until July 2020, she was Chief Executive of E.L. Rothschild LLC, a family office with interests in private companies, public markets and real estate. She is also the Founder of the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism and the Council for Inclusive Capitalism with The Vatican, not-for-profit organizations that develop groundbreaking initiatives with global CEOs and distinguished leaders in government and civil society to catalyze actions that transform capitalism and make our economies and societies more inclusive, dynamic, sustainable and trusted.

Since 2000, Lynn has been a member of the Board of Directors and Nominating & Governance Committee of The Estee Lauder Companies. She has also served on the Boards of The Economist Group, Gulfstream, General Instruments, Bronfman-Rothschild and Weather Central. As part of her charity work, she sits on the Board and Executive Committee of the Peterson Institute for International Economics, the Advisory Board of Focusing Capital on the Long Term (“FCLT”), the McCain Institute for International Leadership and the ERANDA Rothschild Foundation (de Rothschild family foundation), and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Chatham House.

Previously, she served as a member of the National Information Infrastructure Advisory Committee and the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board under President Clinton, and as a member of the United Nations Advisory Committee on Inclusive Financial Services (2006-2011).

Lynn is often a featured speaker at global forums and corporate and university events, including at the United Nations, World Bank, G20 Investor Forum, OECD, Swiss Re, Temasek, Bloomberg, University of Oxford, Tsinghua University, and Peking University. She has also published in The Financial Times, The Wall Street Journal, The New York Times and The Guardian. In 2007, Lynn was awarded the Commendatore Ordine al Merito della Repubblica Italiana. She graduated Magna cum Laude and Beta Kappa from Pomona College in Claremont, CA (1976) and from Columbia University School of Law, NYC (1980) with a Juris Doctor with honors (Harlen Fiske Stone Scholar).

https://www.inclusivecapitalism.com/member/lady-lynn-forester-de-rothschild/

Yeah, things can change. They can get worse... much worse. And a logical person would look at how things are and conclude that that is the most likely scenario to occur by far.

And maybe they have to before they get better. Which is likely also true. But staring at a certainty of much worse to come, and a slight possibility of something better in the distant future is not a place full of hope.

And 50 years ago, the type of shit stain garbage human beings at NPR would have been calling anyone who questioned the narrative that sugar wasn't a problem a conspiracy theorist.

And they would have stated matter-of-factly whatever bullshit talking points the sugar industry was serving up.

My point was that they are definitely doing that. And I don't understand how to ever fight against it. Really the only course forward seems to be enslavement or total destruction.

It's like the Sierra Madre collars in New Vegas DLC. Except small enough to be imperceptible, and inside your body.

Imagine what kind of things you could accomplish with nanotechology though. You could make someone have a "heart attack" and die, and no autopsy would reveal anything.

Not most likely, they do. And we know they've been doing it for decades.

How likely do you think that they have profiles on every single person in the world, and they use the data collected to promote corrupt people who will do their bidding and to crush honest people who won't?

It's the new COVID 6th generation microchip model, and filters out 6 different strains of COVID , and it's 6 nanometers. They call it model 6.6.6.

Yeah, except that being a Christian doesn't mean shit anymore. There are tons of woke churches that kiss BLM feet, and preach compliance with tyrannical lockdown/mask laws, etc.

So those people might be "Christians", but they aren't Christians like Andrew Torba is a Christian.

People spend hours every day cursing the left on social media. They come on here and talk about watering the tree of liberty.

But in reality, none of them even stop watching sportsball or drinking Coca Cola. It's all bullshit bluffing. The truth is that a lot of them expect to lose, and are preparing to lose. They expect to be cheated, and don't plan to do anything except bitch about it. They won't do anything. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to understand that someone who can't commit to not drinking Coca Cola is never going to get their gun and join a militia. They aren't even going to show up to a legal protest, let alone fight in a civil war.

An economic collapse that seems as certain as the changing of the seasons at this point.

Okay, but now there's certainty. Certainty that Biden is importing millions of illegals and sending them to swing states. Certainty that nothing is going to be done about the fraud unless people rise up.

But still they don't.

Fat ass fake losers on the right are thirsty, and they're drinking Coca Cola instead of doing anything. They talk about watering the tree, but they can't even commit to a boycott, let alone a protest, let alone laying their lives on the line.

Independent George would just do it anyway.

Is he? Or is he just a good controlled opposition candidate? Are you sure they aren't telling him to side with certain things so that he can earn trust?

Don't trust any of these people. Betraying you once has to be enough. If you destroy anyone who betrays at all, then there is actually incentive not to betray. But if you accept someone back after they betray you, then you put betrayal on the table since they know they can get away with it. There's no need to get in to the murky waters of "is he controlled opposition or just an opportunist".

Whatever you accept is what you're going to get. Do not accept betrayal at all.

It's because people still believe that those at the top of corporations are productive people who deserve it. But that's not the case anymore. Who succeeds is determined by a bunch of corrupt people, and it's not the most productive or meritorious. It's whoever is willing to be a scumbag and bow down to the powers that be. You think Google and Amazon succeeded legitimately? That it's just a coincidence that all these companies are so closely tied with US intel aka the "deep state"? Google's parent company is called alphabet for shit sake. They don't even hide it. I'm fairly certain they accelerated the production and innovation of mobile phones, because of the data collection capabilities. And I'm also fairly certain they have databases of everyone in the world, and that they use them to decide who should be promoted to positions of power or be allowed to succeed, and who should be crushed.

The left is completely incoherent though. They talk about the ultra-wealthy being the root of all evil, and then they side with them at every turn. Their politics are corporate slogans.

The left: Corporations are evil, all those CEOs only got there by stealing, and they're all sociopaths.

Also the left: The corporations are on the right side. They are obviously fighting for enfranchisement and not disenfranchisement.

The aristocracy of pull.

James Taggart doesn't want vicious and uncivilized competition to take his business away from him. How unpleasant.

They do. But they reject even the idea of entertaining alternate views. And they do this precisely because they don't have to. There are no consequences for ignoring things that upset them at the moment. There will be eventually, but until they start seeing the consequences, they won't change. They will declare falsehoods true, and then watch as nothing bad happens in an immediate way, and think that they can get away with it.

But eventually the consequences will come for them. Or maybe they will come for their children, but they will come eventually. It's like the unsustainable economics of socialism. It can be sustained economically on the built up wealth of others productivity, but it can't be sustained. A rejection of objective reality eventually leads to collapse.

I think it's entirely psychological. It's a result of the tremendous psychological pressure put on young people from all of the insane radicals. And I think that it's the result of a deliberate psychological war being waged on America by its enemies, chiefly China. But also Iran and other countries around the globe. And I think they have their fingers in other countries, preventing cooperation with them against America's enemies. For instance, my country is controlled by China. But other countries I think are greatly influenced by the middle east, like the UK.

And they're all likely working together to create a new global power structure that would be untouchable. And if we're being honest, it kind of already is. Mainly because nobody really believes it exists. The vast majority of people don't have any idea the kind of situation they are in. And I don't think they'll ever wake up, unless things get horrendously bad, and they're forced to give up on irrational and illogical ideas.

I just don't see people voluntarily coming to terms with the fact that most things they believe are completely a-factual. If that were the case, they'd already be there. They consistently swallow the most blatant contradictions. Unfortunately, they don't care what's true. They will only reevaluate when they are forced to. Meaning, when the consequences of their actions actually reach them. And unfortunately for the rest of us, it won't just be them that have to deal with the consequences.

They would defend it. They'd say something like "Good, I'm glad black people get to enjoy some luxury" or, "They worked really hard and created a movement for racial justice like none ever seen before, they deserve it", or some stupid shit like that.

There is literally nothing that will work on them. They think it makes them strong to ignore all rationality. But it only works temporarily. The only reason it works now is because they still have victims to exploit. When the victims run out, everything will collapse and then only the rational decisions that lead to an advanced and complex society will matter again.

And that's when Cyborg Trump will emerge. A new and improved body, half biological, half robotic. 17 feet tall with 76 inch biceps. A permanent American flag cape billowing behind him. A golden Lion's head adorning his chest. And glowing eyes that shoot laser beams.

Don't listen to this faggot. You should be organizing protests. And remember these 2 important things.

1. Have a list of demands.
2. Never stop until they're met.

You need to have a list of demands. If you have no list of demands, (the things you're aiming to achieve with the protest) then it will fizzle out if you can even start it in the first place. And if you stop before your demands are met, you have shown them you are not serious, and that they have no need to take your protesting seriously.

A great many things could be accomplished by this if you actually want to achieve something.

But remember this. Any protest you try to organize will be met with faggots like the guy I'm replying to right now trying to dissuade you. And as soon as your demands are picked, there will be a torrent of arguments against the demands that have been selected and how they're so stupid. And people will say it's feds trying to organize it, and they will just generally do whatever they can to manipulate you in to not doing it.

You've got to be smart and ignore this stuff if you want to win. No violence either. Any violence will be used to destroy you, not them. And you also have to be willing to go to jail and face harsh consequences. They will do everything in their power to stop you from showing the rest of the people who feel helpless that they actually have power and can act. They can't put you all in prison though. They can't do anything to stop you if you actually just realized it.

Democrats want this. If the state becomes their father, they can make them believe and do whatever they want.

None of this shit will ever work on them at all. They'd just say something like "gun owners are more likely to shoot themselves or family members, owning a gun is actually more dangerous to you" or something stupid like that.

And if that didn't stick. The media would write up some new bullshit "study" or whatever, and hand out a couple of talking points that they'd all just repeat.

You can't convince them with words. Anyone who can be convinced with words is already convinced.