1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Listen, you fucking idiot.

I didn’t say I think it’s right, I merely said you have no legal basis for what you’re saying.

Are you fucking stupid?

3
VoterIDMatters 3 points ago +5 / -2
  1. Q does not tell anyone to remain complacent. Ever. Not even once. Q followers are super active.

  2. Regarding predictions: so what? Some have come to pass, most have been misrepresented and many have not come to pass. To most people who follow Qanon it’s a great aggregator of news and documents - it’s a resource. Most q people assume the purpose is twofold:

  • troll the deep state coup plotters

  • mobilize the contingent of conservative leaning people who typically are apathetic, and activate them to get up and vote this time.

The other thing is: going back two-three years, I was way ahead of everyone I talked to with the Spygate situation. There have been many occasions where Qanon pushed the news cycle in a different direction.

If you want to see what trump thinks about Qanon, watch the clip where they ask him.

And don’t confuse q-following dipshits like Bryan Cates saying “mueller is a white hat” bullshit as actually q saying it. Most of the bullshit was never stated by q.

3
VoterIDMatters 3 points ago +3 / -0

Have you heard of fellow Canadian Jordan Peterson?

Look him up on YouTube. Please trust me.

3
VoterIDMatters 3 points ago +3 / -0

But then they would be acknowledging that it’s not a big deal

They literally panicked the sheep of the entire world

There is no going back from that for them

4
VoterIDMatters 4 points ago +6 / -2

If you think Q supporters “hurt Trump’s chances,” you’re a stupid cuck.

-1
VoterIDMatters -1 points ago +4 / -5

I’m not sure why you’re such a fag that your butt hurts whenever a fellow trump supporter mentions a particular topic you disagree with that is defined by trump support and hatred of pedophiles

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clearly you do not understand. You said this:

When you have a mob on the edge of your property threatening you like they did in the video, free fire rules are in effect.

“Free fire rules” are clearly not fucking in effect since he was ARRESTED for simply showing he was armed.

Obviously this is wrong but your claim that free fire rules are in effect is retarded.

6
VoterIDMatters 6 points ago +8 / -2

I’d like to see what your actual comment was and where and what it was actually about

This post means nothing

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t be an idiot. You said something about legality which was false, and I corrected you. I didn’t say anything about my own opinion on what is right.

3
VoterIDMatters 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also: the Catholic Church literally invented the scientific method

2
VoterIDMatters 2 points ago +2 / -0

When Facebook twitter etc say that ballots will still be coming in and being counted weeks later they are doing something called election meddling

-6
VoterIDMatters -6 points ago +4 / -10

Great

Doesn’t matter what you think

You said something about legality that was false

5
VoterIDMatters 5 points ago +7 / -2

Laws are different in every state dude

Making blanket statements about what rules are in effect is dumb

6
VoterIDMatters 6 points ago +6 / -0

Chips only, big deal

But chips and salsa?

Bro

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, most of the children made famous by Sniffy Joe are not smiling.

This kid is obviously having fun.

Obama is too smooth to show that shot to the public. This is a nothing picture.

4
VoterIDMatters 4 points ago +4 / -0

Man, serious consensus cracking going on in this thread

After only 2 minutes of ads, he gets right to the point: the other people in the comments don’t want you to see the video which is hopeful and inspiring

-3
VoterIDMatters -3 points ago +1 / -4

The kid is smiling

The fuck is this bullshit

Any of you ever play with kids? Tickling wrestling etc

This is what that looks like

17
VoterIDMatters 17 points ago +17 / -0

That’s a ridiculous claim. Fox News didn’t concoct it, for one thing. For another, the idea that Fox is reporting on it fir the intention of inflicting emotional distress is ridiculous.

And it wouldn’t make him a traitor to the United States. Just to the dnc

I wonder if they think there is any legal basis for this or if they are really going for settlement on the one hand or discovery on the other

2
VoterIDMatters 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is great for people with immune systems that are weak enough to need an antibody but are not able to produce it themselves.

For most people the body doesn’t even bother with an antibody because it’s not even much of a threat. The body just rejects it. Done deal.

2
VoterIDMatters 2 points ago +2 / -0

At least put the lefty on the left and vice versa

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›