1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Holy fuck you're dense. Not ONCE did I assert anything. I said it makes sense to keep up appearances IF there's something going down.

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension?

3
Vox_Dobad 3 points ago +3 / -0

And it's worth noting that Rush is about the only radio host to not pile on those people

As always, he doesn't jump to conclusions

10
Vox_Dobad 10 points ago +10 / -0

If they even know what you're talking about

9
Vox_Dobad 9 points ago +9 / -0

It was two Libyans who were involved. Gaddafi turned them over.to authorities and paid restitution, even though he claimed innocence.

I tend to believe him

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol Jesus Christ dude, simmer down.

I never said I thought that's what's happening. I said I don't know, but that it would be logical to keep up appearances if there indeed is something to this sting operation theory. After all, it'd be a pretty obvious tip-off to not be moving shit out.

Stop reading so much into what I'm saying. You asked a question to that other pede, I provided a potential answer.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +2 / -1

Uh, no. I gave a logical potential reason, if indeed the sting op is true. I never claimed to know a damn thing

-1
Vox_Dobad -1 points ago +5 / -6

To keep up appearances. I mean, if this "sting operation" theory is correct, which, fuckifiknow, it would make sense to play the part of a departing administration

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll believe my lying eyes, ladypede. Like I said, there are (or at least were) a ton of pictures online of the aftermath at the Pentagon, including light poles sheared off on the expressway (?) hundreds of yards from where the plane hit, gruesome ones of charred passengers still buckled in their seats, and the debris of what was obviously an American Airlines jet.

If it is indeed a massive conspiracy and cover-up, there are thousands and thousands of people in on it who have yet to speak out.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are literally pictures out there of charred bodies still in their seats inside the Pentagon. And debris all over the outside from what was obviously an American Airlines jet. You can even see the lettering on some of the telltale chrome-colored hull pieces

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where? There were zero explosions aside from when the planes hit. Like I said, they're friggin loud. And I've probably watched every single video out there of the entire morning, from the first plane til the collapse of 7.

The only thing I've heard that people misidentified as explosions were as the buildings were already coming down. People heard the floors pancaking against each other.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the buildings were brought down by explosives, why not just say terrorists planted bombs?

Why create a giant conspiracy which would have had to include thousands and thousands of people, including those that "died" on the airplanes, their entire families, Air Traffic Controllers, first responders, and many others, as well as dozens who videoed the events, and a metric shit-ton of eyewitnesses?

Fire in the lower floors brought down WTC7. It's been awhile since I've dived into this rabbit hole, but as I recall, it had a big diesel tank in the basement to run generators.

None of the videos leading up to its (or WTC 1 and 2) collapse captured explosives being detonated. Explosions are extremely loud. Multiply that by dozens for a controlled demo.

1
Vox_Dobad 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Entities" like me? Lol I'm just a solo pede, dude.

You brought up 9/11, not me.

I dunno if the guy's channel is still around, as it was years ago when I watched his vids, but check out RKOwens4 on youtube. Pretty damn definitive evidence of the WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville all being airliners.

And while I'm pretty sure I've probably already seen whatever theory is on your link, I'll check it out.

2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny that you post this on a post with the message "don't let anyone tell you that what you see with your eyes isn't happening."

I can't speak to Ashli Babbit, but there are literally dozens of videos of the planes hitting the WTC, most (but not all) of which were the second hit. Many of these were taken by amateurs. I've probably seen all of them. And there were thousands of eyewitnesses.

The Towers were designed specifically to fall into their own footprint if they ever came down for whatever reason. Burning jet fuel and debris was sufficient heat to weaken the steel structure to the point of collapse with all the weight of the upper floors on top of the weakened structure.

That's why the second tower hit was the first to collapse: that plane hit several floors lower than the first one.

To be clear, that doesn't preclude your theory of Mossad being behind the attack, or that black hats within our own government were involved. Could very well have been an inside job.

But jetliners most definitely took down the Twin Towers.

2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +3 / -1

Waitaminute....can you point me to a picture of that?

Because it's a simple thing, but if it's true that says a lot

2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same here. I suppose it's possible that a double blind is in play with regards to Q, but it's an obscure enough source that I highly doubt it.

view more: Next ›