Captions need some work. I believe at 2:49 he says something really close to "We're not paying you a hundred bucks an hour to offer up excuses..." The beginning of the sentence is really hard to work out.
Who was Rachel Rodriguez working for?
Meh. On second thought, I think rounding imprecision makes this less interesting than I thought. Deleting.
Perhaps there's a nimble navigator here with better math skills than I who can force these ratios into other outcomes and falsify my theory. However -
The ratio of in-person to mail-in voters suggests Trump actually had a larger share of the popular vote. Here's the relevant numbers worked out with some napkin math:
All Votes: 54% In-Person 46% Mail-In
Trump: 67% In-Person 32% Mail-In
Biden: 41% In-Person 58% Mail-In
The only way I could make those ratios work in one equation is:
Trump Total Share of the Biden/Trump Votes: 50.77% (33.75% In-Person + 17.02% Mail-In)
Biden Total Share of the Biden/Trump Votes: 49.23% (20.25% In-Person + 28.98% Mail-In)
Simply put, since In-Person voting was more common and Trump had better results In-Person, his overall vote comes out stronger.
If Trump launched it for the public square, I'd love to see three main components in COVFEFE:
- Has a private social network with features to replace Facebook.
- Has a public social network with features to replace Twitter.
- Has a method of aggregating all of your incoming and outgoing content to all other social platforms, rendering them obsolete.
Image of the post: https://thedonald.win/p/11RhTYZl3M/image-of-the-potus-post-since-tw/c/
I thought it would be banned immediately, so here you go.
Full context here:
Longer version on Instagram is a little more believable:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CIrTQenp2YX/
Still, this is fishy.
This looks faker than a Joey Salads video.
Bing bing, bong.
The audit must be Independent. It must also include some method of confirming that signatures are not at this very moment being fabricated.
The audit must be Independent. It must also include some method of confirming that signatures are not at this very moment being fabricated.
Easy. After you've seen how much more you need to win, you can now check the registration lists, see who hasn't voted, and assign all the fake ballots to those voters. Unfortunately, that takes a little bit of time to complete, and you can't have pesky poll watchers present while you do it.
EDIT: Graph taken from this insightful article: https://www.sgtreport.com/2020/11/the-definitive-case-proving-donald-trump-won-the-election/
Praying for you. God hears. Christ is the answer.
Unfortunately, sources reporting on clandestine Military operations must remain anonymous. If they did not, they would never be sources again. Please note that Adam Housley is reporting the same thing:
https://twitter.com/adamhousley/status/1330214122508718085
I also dislike anonymous sources and will withhold judgment. Things are getting interesting though.
I am jaw-dropped. Housley is legit. Incidentally, he has also done extensive reporting in Venezuala.
This is a real post by him.Twitter link:
https://twitter.com/adamhousley/status/1330214122508718085
Everybody, pray.
OP: why did you mention the "rose" symbol? Can you source that?
Infogalatic pedes. The Wikipedia alternative:
Haven't made any conclusions, but there's crazy voter growth from 2016 to 2020 in Maricopa County. Trump earned tons of votes compared 2016, but Biden's gains are even more in raw numbers. You can see precincts on a map here:
https://recorder.maricopa.gov/reviewer/default.htm?DistrictType=N&DistrictCode=1
In the (new to 2020) Cheatham Precinct, Biden received 3404 votes to Trump's 1051. There's clearly some redistricting going on that's shuffling things around, but Trump won Maricopa County by about ~45,000 votes in 2016. 747,361 to 702,907.
This year, there were 55,000 more votes for the county and the margin is in reverse with Trump's count under Biden's by almost the exact same ~45,000 number. 995,665 to 1,040,774.
There are a lot of Precinct Flips too (60 from Rep to Dem), like "Bluebird" gaining over 1000 new Democrat votes in 2020 and flipping, 2610 to 2094. Lantana County and Longhorn flipped too, with huge Democrat gains.
I have no idea whether it's legit, but there are some astonishing turn-arounds from 2016.
I think you're correct, though I won't claim to be an expert on Benford's. With a small sample, I don't know how much we can make of this. I'm doing some analysis right now on changes in precinct. Will post again if I find anything interesting.
"Told"? By Whom? Isn't she a duly elected legislator? Can she not do what she want to legislate?