10
Wallsmither 10 points ago +10 / -0

Ted Cruz going from 'Lying Ted' to literally the only Republican in congress with any semblance of testicles is a true underdog story

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

If this all turns out to be true it'll be wilder than any spy movie ever made! Like I don't think you could tie the treads together as well even if you tried!

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

He probably just slipped on his own drool and they dont want the press to see him without his functional meds.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think its wishful thinking that Biden has an ankle monitor as opposed to him simply being in a boot as a dumb old dementia man that fell down chasing the doggy.

5
Wallsmither 5 points ago +5 / -0

Page 65 "Ramsland confirms that data breaches in the Dominion software permitted rouge actors to penetrate and manipulate the software during the recent general election. He further concludes at least 96,000 mail in ballots were illegally counted as they were not cast by legal voters."

If this is true we throw out the GA election. Trump only lost by 12k. This isnt even counting all the other shady shit going on outlined here.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look I'm not going to be upset if it's posted at 12:01 am est. However, I am going to start calling doubts if I wake up tomorrow and find nothing has happened.

4
Wallsmither 4 points ago +4 / -0

They can submit it electronically until Midnight. I don't know where the source is that is saying it'll be here by midnight, but they technically can/do have the ability to file it this late

8
Wallsmither 8 points ago +8 / -0

I want this to be Sidney Powells 2ND biggest accomplishment today

6
Wallsmither 6 points ago +6 / -0

Same, Powell has not strayed my trust yet but if she claims a 'biblical lawsuit will be filled on Wednesday' and it doesn't happen then I'm going to take everything she says from this point forward with a grain of salt.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats assuming all (or a majority) of them that would have been rejected are for Biden, if it's just a rejectable average number then many of them could have been for Trump. We need to prove that those ballots are for Biden and would have been rejected previously.

2
Wallsmither 2 points ago +2 / -0

I pray thats the answer. If another bomb is dropped immediately after the shitshow in PA it will send a powerful message to the left and media that this isnt over

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

Charge everyone that was involved left, right, and center. I don't care how high level they are, if they committed fraud get them out of here.

2
Wallsmither 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree she needs more damning evidence but we know the seeds are there. If she can lay it out for the world to see it has the potential to shatter everything as we know it. That is only of course if she has the proof to back up the bold claims. I believe her as it stands (she hasn't given me a reason not to), but I know there's a difference when it comes to proving legal claims.

2
Wallsmither 2 points ago +2 / -0

This NEEDS to be an absolute legal bomb they unleash on the fraud case, Sidney needs to be backing up her claims irrefutably if we are to win this. Anything less than that will have any further hype/speculations from the Trump legal team be faced with heavy skepticism moving forward by all parties.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is as much confirmation as we usually get (usually its "you'll see it soon"). I'm going to be honest, if she doesn't provide the lawsuit this week (or at least a reasonable explanation as to why it wasn't released this week along with a new definitive timeline) its going to be super discouraging moving forward and I can see a lot of people on our cause falling off. We need positive progress even if just a smidge to keep spirits high!

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was reading through the document on the link. The 12th ammendment was written to outline electoral college procedures and describe what happens if one person doesn't get a majority, this is what the "other dispute" line is about. This is simply saying that if is underclear if a candidate gets 270 this happens, and by this point if the certified votes are handed for counting that constitutes valid votes. States would have to undo certification before that point, if it's in congresses hands they're counting it unless there's an objection from both chambers. Those unfortunately are clear votes for a candidate if they are certified when counted.

That only happens in a few instances. In this case, enough states would have to get throw out to get Biden under the 270 mark, and the only way electoral votes is thrown out is through the previously mentioned house/senate agreement. If we reach January 6th and nothings changed we have simply lost the white house by that point. The changes would need to be made prior to this point.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see it now, I would not count on this option. There is 0% chance that is happening, it needs both House and Senate approval which the democratic house will never give.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats when the senate counts the vote that already occurred in the state a few weeks prior. Can those results change after the electors already voted on the 23rd the month prior?

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

I made the mistake of seeing Sekulow and thinking "Jay" instantly, didn't know his son was on the legal team (rarely hear of him, even more so related to Trump). Found the newsmax article to confirm

2
Wallsmither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Source? I can't find anything in the link or on Jay's twitter

Edit: Also just realized the title says "Jordan" when his name is "Jay". I'm doubting this post.

Edit 2: I'm an idiot, Jordan is Jay's kid. He says this is entirely unrelated to the conference Thursday but is a new shocking thing that will be revealed in a lawsuit.

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/998154?section=newsmax-tv&keywords=georgia-lawsuit-jordan-sekulow-constitution&year=2020&month=11&date=21&id=998154&oref=t.co

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›