2
Wallsmither 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we have enough time after two weeks? I'm not doubting, I'm just a bit slow on the uptake and could use some help understanding what the timeline looks like because it seems like we're cutting it close to the electoral college meeting. Can cerified votes be undone in mass if we prove fraud in that time period?

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

I partially agree, as long as we're doing it the legal way optics is secondary and who gives two fucks about what the left will say because they'll hate us to the end of time. Though having optics on our side is always a benefit to us so we shouldn't throw it out the window so quickly. The more people in the middle on our side, or at the very least not against us, the smoother a dominating victory can be achieved.

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm fine with that too, fuck Wayne County. Thats looking to be more and more likely, though predictibly the narrative would become "look at the racists trying to take away black votes in Detroit." But fuck the dems in Wayne. They broke nearly every rule in the books in terms of their election guidelines so give them what they deserve.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

An audit should prove the fuckery with the votes but just tossing ballots because they didn't follow proper protocol is (unfortunately) not the typical court procedures. Hopefully they see the massive scale of this fraud and do something, but at this moment right now its difficult to see the courts invalidating an entire states worth of votes because some (exclusively democrat) counties were up to no good.

I pray I'm wrong and will gladly eat crow if so. I also know that there will be more to come out in our favor moving forward that will make the courts lean ever more in our favor.

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree 100% with that, but courts historically do not like to just toss out all ballots if some are bad, so invalidating all of MI because of mostly Wayne County fucking around is uncharted territory. Though the corruption is so extreme this time around that it might set a new precedent

13
Wallsmither 13 points ago +15 / -2

As legally correct as it is, tossing out votes isnt a good look from the general public perspective. Though, if we toss them and we say to them "no, prove they're legit ballots" then the balls in their court (which isn't a game they will win/want to play).

Either way its a win-win, but I think proving fraud should be the ultimate goal instead of settling for tossing ballots. If tossing illegitimate ballots because the left didn't want to follow the rules is what it takes to get them to play fairly then I'm all for it.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +2 / -1

Agreed, so far its just dems not following the rules (which is big, but we need concrete evidence that the election results would change if the fraud didn't occur). We need more, hopefully they're ramping up the scale as we go

6
Wallsmither 6 points ago +6 / -0

"We will present the evidence we've collected over the last 2 weeks"

IM ROCK HARD BABY

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thats why I'm still here and fighting baby

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree 100%, if it wasn't for the MSM there wouldn't be a modern democratic party (or at least one that's gone this fair off the rails). Though the MSM has been doing a fantastic job these last 4 years of throwing away the mask of "objectivity" and outing themselves as democratic party fluffers that even the most casual of viewer can see.

1
Wallsmither 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't like the optics surrounding this option. As much as I agree with it (don't get me wrong, if he does it ill support him 100%), but I can't imagine this sitting well with the common centralist in America. If he does he'll first need to drop an overwhelming hammer on the election process that proves without a shadow of a doubt to the casual observer that Trump did indeed win this last election and was cheated to an absurd degree.

Fuck what the lefties think, they'll hate him/us no matter what. Its the everyman that doesn't pay close attention to politics that worries me.

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ill err on the side of caution until proof is provided, as smart/loyal as he is I'm still just so tired of this tick-tock garbage

4
Wallsmither 4 points ago +4 / -0

Scott Adams has always been a sharp guy, has he let us down in the past? (I'm actually asking, I don't know if he's made claims that turned out to be wrong in the past)

4
Wallsmither 4 points ago +4 / -0

Summary: Dems ON AN AFFIDAVIT say "If it wasn't for the cheating by the election officials my vote wouldn't have been counted!"

7
Wallsmither 7 points ago +8 / -1

Signed up for phone calls but seriously considering driving down from Indiana to watch the recounts

3
Wallsmither 3 points ago +3 / -0

GA with the audits should be good for us

5
Wallsmither 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm hoping for a flat line from beginning to end. Its impossible but a boy can dream

8
Wallsmither 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm sure most of the federal higher ups never stopped communicating with him in the first place

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›