I grabbed that quote from here:
https://www.tapatalk.com/groups/mabusincarnatefr/nostradamus-ww3-prophecy-t5557.html
I had it bookmarked.
But there's plenty of Notradamus info that is much more detailed than that. Here's a decent list:
Probably Lynne de Rothschilds. I believe she married into the family and is chummy with the Hillary crowd.
I don't think the real Masters of the Universe are quite so public, but I certainly have no more info on them than anyone else here.
I was actually thinking of doing this last summer and wearing a Project Veritas camera. I even looked into the job opportunities here in California.
Sadly, they required mask wearing.
Absolutely, I'm just wondering if we're going to be able to drive them out of hiding.
In Nostradamus' third quatrain, Mabus is predicted to die in a campaign to unite all nations. Upon Mabus' death, Nostradamas predicts this will start the "end of days", and in the view of most historians, this references World War 3. Also, most historians believe this attempt by Mabus to unite all nations is a reference to the Middle East conflict. Upon the death of Mabus, Nostradamus states that the "Bear and the Eagle will unite against the Snake and Dragon". A possible reference to United States as the "eagle", Russia as the "Bear", China as the "dragon" and Iran as the "snake"
How nice would it be if a nation like Brazil banned Coke products for fomenting dangerous politics?
This is exactly correct!
The difference between a consumer and a politician is key to understanding this.
Too hard to crush them all. But we certainly can pick specific targets and go after them one by one until the rest get the message and get un-woke.
Rothschilds haven't peaked their heads up yet, but pretty much everyone else has.
I very much agreed at the time. I still think the TX case was certainly in their wheelhouse; settling disputes between states.
I've since had the opportunity to speak with some legal minds who have suggested that perhaps they were trying to avoid having the Federal Gov't decide an issue (election certification) that is clearly to be decided by State Legislatures.
It's not my argument, but it is one I find reasonable and defensible, and the State Legislatures might still get this whole thing fixed without SCOTUS intervention.
This has been a good discussion.
I suppose we ought to agree on a definition of fascism, but since the term has been so misused over the past many decades, that's a bit of a tough ask. I think we can agree that there's quite a bit of ethnic animosity throughout the region and that there a lot of strong-arm governments who are very intricately involved with their private sectors.
In the case of Russia/Ukraine, Stalin deliberately moved ethnic Russians into Ukraine, and that's just one of many examples of that centuries old back-and-forth. In 2014, ethnic Russians did make up most of Eastern Ukraine, and the West very much preferred the EU to Russia.
I found this article just now (don't laugh at the source....CNN actually did some real journalism back then): https://www.cnn.com/2014/03/06/opinion/speedie-ukraine-far-right/index.html
There are some known facts: First, far-right, anti-Semitic, anti-Russian and openly fascist groups have existed and do exist as a blight on modern Ukraine. A 2012 European Parliament resolution condemned the main – but by no means most extreme – ultra-right party, Svoboda, as “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic.
This extraordinary EU resolution contains 18 points of concern over policies embedded in laws of the Ukrainian Rada, or Parliament. A key paragraph reads that the EU “is concerned about the rising nationalistic sentiment in Ukraine.” The Parliament stresses that “racist, anti-Semitic and xenophobic views go against the EU’s fundamental values and principles.”
As for the US role, may I present you with Victoria Nuland discussing the coup: https://twitter.com/almostjingo/status/1176911037141942272
As I said, there are no good actors in this whole saga.
How has BLM managed to coerce so many US corporations to boycott Georgia?
Same tactic would apply. CRT and playing the race card.
I can't find a link right now that discusses the Ukrainian's being fascists, so I'll drop that part for now. Ethnicity certainly played a role, as it has between these two peoples for centuries. I'm not claiming either side has or had the moral high ground. The whole sordid continuing episode is rife with bad intentions on all sides, including the US.
Yanukovych first tried to get financial help from the EU, but that didn't happen, so he turned to Russia. The pro-EU Ukrainian politicians rebelled rather quickly, and that's when the US State Department stepped in.
The part of the back story that is most important is that Ukraine was about 2 years away from opening up a gas pipeline to the EU, which would have robbed Russia of one of their most important markets. George Soros was and is involved with every aspect of this, as is Burisma. We all know where the story goes from there.
I got to hear the entire court case history last night from the lead attorney. I'm going to post the video as soon as they email it to me.
I think you'll find the story frustrating, interesting, and perhaps a bit of a reason for hope that SCOTUS isn't as bad as we've been given good reason to believe after the refusal to hear election fraud cases.
Convention of States.
We need 34 States to convene an Article V Convention where Amendments can be made or repealed (16th and 17th are on the table).
Yes they are. They are cornered and they know it, but that's when they're the most dangerous.
Are you suggesting an Amendment?
Man, would I like to see the howls of rage from the AOC faction if that hypothetical happened.
Unlikely, for that exact reason.
Did you bring former Dems with you?
Biden doesn't even get to pick which tie he wears.
They just ruled to let California churches open with no attendance restrictions. That appears to be upholding the Constitution.
Yes, we could do with a helluva lot more consistency.
Could you please explain why SCOTUS just ruled to allow all California churches to open with no restrictions on attendees if they already own it?
I got to listen to the attorney who brought that case last night.
If they didn't fear us, they wouldn't have walls around DC, they'd be grabbing guns already, and we'd all be in the Gulag awaiting trial in front of 17 new SCOTUS judges.
They've got the smallest House majority in history, a split Senate that can't afford to lose a single vote, a stolen Presidency that 52% of American knows was a fraud, a "conservative" SCOTUS, and Republican control of good majority of State Legislatures and Governorships.
Their grip on power is hanging by a thread, despite their pretenses otherwise.
Internal polling and focus groups indicated this was not popular.
That's how they make most of their decisions; they throw out a red herring and see how well the MSM can spin it.
Usually, they just put their "ideas" into a pending folder to be brought back out at some point in the future when they think the political winds have changed.
Not my area of expertise, but probably one of these:
https://toptenswag.com/best-micro-camera/
For research purposes.......