MODS -- ? -- Where is the "message the mods' thread? Someone referred me to it, but I cannot locate it. Thanks.
Seems that there are more posts with an overtone of violence advocacy. Most are by shills, I sure. However, in the 'Deport categories,' advocating violence is not mentioned as a reason to deport. Please think about adding this. Thank you.
An article on Newsmax, July 14, 2016 (links below):
Conservative commentator Ann Coulter said Thursday that Donald Trump would be making his "first mistake" by choosing Indiana Gov. Mike Pence as his running mate.
"I won't believe it, until I hear it from the Trump's mouth," Coulter said on Facebook. "Pence is the combo-platter of disaster."
News organizations reported that Trump would select Pence as his running mate for the Republican presidential nomination.
Trump said he would announce his choice on Friday — and The Indianapolis Star reported that Pence was dropping his re-election bid for the No. 2 spot on the presidential ticket.
But Coulter, who endorsed Trump early in the campaign, was not impressed by the governor.
"He's all in for corporate America bringing in as many guest workers as they please to replace American workers, tried to sell the monster amnesty as a 'compromise bill.' (How about this compromise: We start with a wall...)," she said in the Facebook post.
"He also somehow managed to tick off both sides in gay marriage debate. After his state passed a law passed protecting Christians from having to participate in gay marriages, all hell broke loose."
Coulter was referring to last year's religious freedom bill that was attacked as being anti-gay and how Pence addressed the fallout.
"Pence thought to himself: 'I have semi heading for me. Should I just stand here? Yes, I think I'll just stand here!'" Coulter said.
"First, he allowed himself to be portrayed as a right-wing homophobic nut and then — just days later — he sold out to the left-wing activists, anyway."
She also expressed her displeasure on Twitter:
"BETTER VP PICKS FOR TRUMP! Kris Kobach, Scott Brown, Pat McCrory, Mike Crapo, David Clarke, Mike Tyson, my next door neighbor ..." — @AnnCoulter
LINKS: https://www.newsmax.com/Politics/ann-coulter-mike-pence-trump-mistake/2016/07/14/id/738733/
https://vdare.com/articles/no-to-hapless-jackal-mike-pence-too-trump-has-better-vp-choices
Saw SCOTUS "Rule 20" mentioned a few times on twitter, but I don't understand what it might mean for our current situation. Is there anyone who can help?? Thanks.
RULE 20 begins like this:
Rule 20. Procedure on a petition for an extraordinary writ “
- Issuance by the Court of an extraordinary writ authorized by 28 U. S. C. §1651(a) is not a matter of right, but of discretion sparingly exercised. To justify the granting of any such writ, the petition must show that the writ will be in aid of the Court's appellate jurisdiction, that exceptional circumstances warrant the exercise of the Court's discretionary powers, and that adequate relief cannot be obtained in any other form or from any other court...."
Rule 20 complete: https://ballotpedia.org/Supreme_Court_Rule_20
Plaintiff in the Georgia case filed by @SidneyPowell1 asks the Court "to enter a judgement in their favor and provide the following emergency relief:
*1. An order directing Governor Kemp, Secretary Raffensperger and the Georgia State Board of Elections to de-certify the election results;
*2. An order enjoining Governor Kemp from transmitting the currently certified election results to the Electoral College;
*3. An order requiring Governor Kemp to transmit certified election results that state that President Donald Trump is the winner of the election;
*4. An immediate order to impound all the voting machines and software in Georgia for expert inspection by the Plaintiffs.
*5. An order that no votes received or tabulated by machines that were not certified as required by federal and state law be counted.
*6. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia Secretary of State Rule 183-1-14-0.9-.15 violates the Electors and Elections Clause, U.S. CONST. art.
*7. A declaratory judgment declaring that Georgia’s failed system of signature verification violates the Electors and Elections Clause by working a de facto abolition of the signature verification requirement;
*8. A declaratory judgment declaring that current certified election results violates the Due Process Clause, U.S. CONST. Amend. XIV;
*9. A declaratory judgment declaring that mail-in and absentee ballot fraud must be remedied with a Full Manual Recount or statistically valid sampling that properly verifies the signatures on absentee ballot envelopes and that invalidates the certified results if the recount or sampling analysis shows a sufficient number of ineligible absentee ballots were counted;
*10. An emergency declaratory judgment that voting machines be Seized and Impounded immediately for a forensic audit—by plaintiffs’ expects;
*11. A declaratory judgment declaring absentee ballot fraud occurred in violation of Constitutional rights, Election laws and under state law;
*12. A permanent injunction prohibiting the Governor and Secretary of State from transmitting the currently certified results to the Electoral College based on the overwhelming evidence of election tampering;
*13. Immediate production of 36 hours of security camera recording of all rooms used in the voting process at State Farm Arena in Fulton County, GA from 12:00am to 3:00am until 6:00pm on November 3.
*14. Plaintiffs further request the Court grant such other relief as is just and proper, including but not limited to, the costs of this action and their reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988."
(starts at 7:15 -- Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWhF7pqAAxg)
*--> "Without 230, they're [smaller tech sites like Gab, Bitchute, Parler] toast! Again, they'd sell out, they'd die, or they'd be litigated against constantly and eventually call it quits. 230 protects those smaller sites. The smaller sites are the ones actually conforming to the law. Take 230 protection away from groups that persist in editorializing content for political and social reasons unrelated to US law! It's as simple as that. Just refine 230. You don't need to get rid of it. In fact, you should expand it. 230 is a good idea in sum and substance.
*--> Net neutrality! While it's pointless for ISPs, [it would] be a great idea to have something akin to it for the social media giants. Be neutral. If you're a platform, act like a platform. If you want to be a publisher, then you can be sued for the material that you are publishing. Make it clear which one you want. You'll have two internets. You have the platform side that will have every bit of edgy content. And then you'll have the publisher's side that'll be very mainstream. It'll be basically a news aggregator, with the NY Times, CNN, and stuff. Corporations! That's what we're headed toward, a schismatic, two-fold internet, assuming we can keep 230 intact. Get rid of that and we have only one internet and it'll be very, very bland. I certainly wouldn't be on it. [...] Just the way that it is."
I don't have a twatter account, but there are about 5 people that I anonymously check on each day over there. Here are 3 related tweets sent by WENDY PATTERSON (@wendyp4545) this morning (Nov. 23 at 8:01 AM) --
Tweet 1: "LET ME CLEAR UP for anyone who believes Sidney is suing for criminal charges. She will be suing in civil which means that the standard she has to meet is the preponderance of the evidence. Criminal charges changes the standard to guilty beyond a reasonable doubt."
Tweet 2: "ONCE SIDNEY PROVES HER CASE, the evidence and findings can and will be used for law enforcement to pursue a criminal case. Don't confuse the goal to prove Trump won the election and that people in both parties committed fraud to steal a Presidential election. Give Trump his win."
Tweet 3: "I believe that someone needs to explain to the public the legal process and explain the civil litigation verses criminal prosecution. Your messaging is falling extremely short and fear and panic is ensuing."
I need a link to download the raw text of the President's letter to Pelosi, not the 6-page letter image.
Anything out there yet? Thanks!
