Fun fact: we are literally helping other countries establish federal police forces. Thats what that money is going to.

As opposed to letting the dems win without a fight? I've weighed the options, and while the demoralization is real, we've still got to fight, as unsavory as it is. There's the still the very real threat of the 6th in play, and Trump will need those senators.

The best strategy i have is this: don't focus on "where" the info came from, as much as "who" is giving the info. Do they have a reputation? Whats their track record for success? Anything thats even mildly Fake News, Twitter rando, or Q related is going to get acosted, with SAUCE. But citing something thats officially Trump related, or something like legal docs from a FOIA request is your safest bet.

And in general ALWAYS CHECK THE AUTHOR OF ANY ARTICLE YOU READ OR POST. This is honestly the biggest mistake I see on both sides of the aisle.

I agree, I hate the DailyWire and copied the url without going there by immediately archiving it. I'm not OP who posted it.

Tried to archive it, but you can't read it anyway, since its behind a hard paywall.

An old saying: There's always an eye to see, and a tongue to tell.

I've never liked this dude, but I'm sad to see how few allies we really have. ToiletPaperUSA

This is actual glowie propaganda.

Wow, he actually didn't cuck out, I'm shocked.

Since I so rarely get the opportunity- every single "accuser", to include the worst allegations, of Trump's was an adult female who consented to their interactions, to include sexual ones, with him, as described in their own words, by their own testimony. Trump denies these allegations of course, but even the accusers admit they consented.

Lol, anybody giving money to Trump is doing so willingly, and a lot of us aren't giving any money at all, other than our time and effort.

Just how much are they paying you?

I don't expect anything from him on the 6th, but the only reason we have any hope at all is because Pence is VP instead. I hate everything Krispy chooses to be.

Can we refer to him anytime he's mentioned as "Krispy Kreme Christie" always and forever?

Could it be that he planned for what would happen either way? I.e. controlled options, either they take the case and he wins, or they don't and he pursues this strategy along with others instead.

He's a lawyer, all lawyers are grifters. Don't rely them on them to save you if you aren't paying them to represent you.

My personal opinion on him is similar, but I'm fine to let him do whatever, if it actually helps us in some way. I would still vote for Loeffer and Perdue, but he's probably right otherwise.

Well if Trump is president, he still needs us to to vote for them to keep the Senate majority, so while quoting Joe Biden looks bad, this isn't a concession.

This is one of the few "mental gymnastics" posts I've seen that would actually make sense, if they had any morals, and any way to concede that wouldn't make the left riot again. Biden's handlers will never allow that.

Unfortunately, I think the only alternate plan would be to appeal to Crazy Nancy for her own power grab, but that would probably screw us in the process.

This sounds like "House of Saddam" which is actually a decent show, despite being from BBC/HBO. This one will probably just be anti American trash tho.

Youre right. This story isn't true at all, Trump's ambitions were squashed before this place even reopened. Also think Trump is being mixed up with Donald Ross.

Lol, thats not the kind of gov employee I'm talking about. I'm talking a junior swamp monster type.

Its how I know Hannity's "good everyday people on the ground" at the FBI/other gov agencies, is a fucking lie.

Hey I get it, but I'm not doxxing my source publicly, tho I could prove it if a mod asked.

This is a link to my favorite speech by Trump and in general

The whole thing is great and gets posted here quite a bit, but it motivates me, when I'm feeling down, especially since I'm the one holding the line for everyone in my life, against my NPC family member.

This would be the last possibility, since, if for no reason, Julian Assange has always hated the Clintons, since at least 2010, if not before.

FWIW, thats what I've heard from someone within the gov- that what Assange leaked was merely mildly embarrassing diplomatic stuff, and not anywhere near the worst stuff he actually had, causing the gov to internally label him a terrorist. The 2016 leaks were the closest they came to revealing what they were really up to.

NP. Just assume they rewrote everything and you won't go wrong.

I learned my lesson the first time I said Bush Sr. wasn't as bad as he could have been. I didn't appreciate it (kind of still don't) but I started to understand more and more after that, lol.