1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a drop in the bucket compared to all of the companies causing problems right now. This is reminiscent of how the fake news is covering covid. Reporting gross contraction numbers so it sounds scary, but in reality its like 2%

2
Weremoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

This dude you and I are both destroying is a liar on the scale we haven't seen since the DNC.

I strongly suspect that he's a plant. I kind of wish we moderated at the level we did back on Reddit. I'm worried that media matters and others are going to be screencapping accounts like his to paint us as things we aren't.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, "Jews" do not, you absolute clown.

Technocrats do. Some are jews. Many are not. 99% of jews have nothing to do with this.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not disputing the claim. I'm disputing the presentation

I've made that abundantly clear from the outset.

Spez: and I predicted the way this would go perfectly. You're not interested in employing a precise message. You're interested in a scapegoat for your own failures.

0
Weremoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

also, please explain what you think a strawman argument is. You keep using that word and I don't think you know what it is.

0
Weremoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

You don't think that Jews dominate control over the most powerful Democrat leadership positions (Schumer, Schiff, Nadler, Feinstein, Pelosi) and you think that Jews don't dominate control over our mainstream media and you think that Jews don't own our usury central bank and you think that Jews aren't funding Antifa and BLM?

Go eat your jello, Joe. It's almost nap time

4
Weremoose 4 points ago +4 / -0

you've been blocked

Leftist activity intensifies

0
Weremoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

The point is: when you say "Jews do X" it is the same as when leftists say "whites do X" and then you and they both run to anecdotes to justify extremely dishonest generalizations.

When arguing with Muslims, they'll often challenge you to find in the gospels where Christ said "I am God, worship me". Well, He doesn't say that. But he heavily implies to former and accepts/demands the latter. But because he doesn't say the narrow phrase they demand, they ignore the rest.

You're pursuing the same dishonest trick here. Sure, you didn't say "all jews are bad". But you implied the everliving fuck out of it.

So if you don't really think that all jews are bad, just make small changes to the way you present your information. It's not hard man. The fact that you so insist on using words which wrongly express what you claim to believe shows me that you actually believe the words you're using and are trying to obfuscate instead.

0
Weremoose 0 points ago +1 / -1

Well this is a new level of dishonesty. This is so obviously fallacious that it's difficult for me to even begin dissecting it

This analogy ignores the implications of the root claim. "That dog bit my child" is different than "Pit Bulls are known to maim children". The first is anecdote. It's just something that happened. The second is a call for a solution, designed to open the hearer up to be susceptible to a proposed solution.

"That person was racist towards me" vs "white people are racist"

"That man raped me" vs "men are rapists"

"These willing members of a secret cabal are seeking power through technocratic authoritarianism" vs "jews are trying to undermine wester civilization"

Do you really not see the difference? Or are you just lazy?

6
Weremoose 6 points ago +7 / -1

You don't think that Jews dominate control over the most powerful Democrat leadership positions (Schumer, Schiff, Nadler, Feinstein, Pelosi) and you think that Jews don't dominate control over our mainstream media and you think that Jews don't own our usury central bank and you think that Jews aren't funding Antifa and BLM?

What an absolute illiterate assclown you are. Is that you, Joe? You forgetting what you just said again?

Spez: see what I'm talking about, everyone? You try to give them feedback on their message and they don't want to hear it. Because they're not interested in solutions. They're interested in absolution from their own personal failures. Just like a hood rat who blames whitey. Imprecision is a hallmark of insincerity.

12
Weremoose 12 points ago +12 / -0

These clowns aren't interested in making America great again. They're failures looking for a scape goat just like the losers on the left.

9
Weremoose 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why do you paint an entire race for the actions of a few? How are you any different from BLM or leftist anti-white identitarians?

You'd be so much more effective if you'd bother to tighten up your terminology even just a little bit. But every one of you I've talked to absolutely refuses, and gets angry at the suggestion.

So my determination is that people like you are either ShariaBlue shills here to make us look bad, or you're useful idiots unknowingly carrying their water. Go fuck yourself either way.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

the common claim is that Jews have been expelled from 109 different countries. It's more complicated than it appears and requires and understanding of medieval catholicism, but people often don't want to hear that.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

group causes same problems

And I dealing with 109 countries here? Just need to know the ideology behind the claim before I go into areas which aren't relevant

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

You've missed my point. Making it racial is wrong. It's an ideological struggle.

Most Arabs are Muslim. Islam is the greatest force for evil on the planet. I'm going to attack the Islamic philosophy, not the Arabic people.

2
Weremoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem is that you guys push it way too far. Saying "The Jews" do all this bad stuff is no different than the Left saying "The Whites" do bad stuff, because some white guys do bad things.

Take Mindgeek. We all hear about the Jewish founder. But he was a co-founder with a Syrian and a German. Do Syrians and Germans get passes?

If you want to say that there's a Zionist cabal in conjunction with other secret societies all working to degrade western culture, I'm down for that fight. If you want to lump in the nice jewish family who owns a deli down the road, which is what you're doing when you use such a broad reaching term, then I'll oppose you at every turn.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

Texas can't be pink. We need to build the wall!

3
Weremoose 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hate to bring the tone down, but the Left uses the struggles of these wonderful people to advocate infanticide.

5
Weremoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

Either ego (hope not)

Or Adam has outgrown the show

16
Weremoose 16 points ago +16 / -0

I tutored a Taiwanese girl in college. She was the only Taiwanese on campus. If the Chinese students ever heard her say she was Taiwanese, or mention Taiwan, theydbeat her up. I found out about it when she came in to our session with bruises. She begged me not to report it, and my stupid 19 year old self didn't. One of my biggest regrets.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

In Ann's case, she thought she could wag the dog.

When Daddy Trump proved to be his own man, she ran away from home instead of accepting that he knows best.

1
Weremoose 1 point ago +1 / -0

No thanks. I don't want syphilis.

view more: Next ›