4
wethepepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

The rational part of me says "these are Mike's notes"

The hopium addict says "they printed this shit and gave it to him"

2
wethepepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

My hunch: they built their platform using all the AWS services and now they can only move to other big tech platforms with similar offerings.

Gab runs their own servers. That’s the smartest but not the easiest way.

The Donald uses servers from who knows where - them not saying provides security (but I think they researched carefully which providers have been solid in the past). And have set things up to scale without big techs services

Making the decision to go that way after you’ve already committed to the big tech way is very hard and requires a lot of time and effort

And, frankly.

It’s likely their devs aren’t actually all that based. To put them on AWS in the first place was foolish. 90% of people who are actually based would have known that after watching big tech continually increase their aggressive censorship and deplatforming.

If their devs aren’t based then they’ve probably bailed for fear or never getting another tech job or some bullshit.

5
wethepepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think their bigger problem is they used all the AWS services to make their life easier and are now limited to only a handful of big tech options

And that’s why they can’t find anyone else

32
wethepepe 32 points ago +32 / -0

It truly is an exciting time

Big tech and most people don’t realise what just happened.

Big tech has opened the door to innovation again. Before everyone was content using their services. Yeah everyone kind of agreed that they hated the tech giants but very few actually had the motivation to do anything about leaving them.

This shit just displaced many people who were previously reluctant to try an alternative.

Now the time to jump in. Pick a business and set up an alternative!

3
wethepepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn’t count. It’s a private business. Everyone knows private businesses are fair game.

But you do not touch their places of worship: government buildings. They’re very sensitive about that!

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree but also he might not need to

Someone said most of the Republicans are back up for election in 2022 or something

Assuming free and fair elections (llolllll).

Then he could go through and basically pick who he wants to replace the backstabbers

Then run again in 2024 and win. Provided free and fair election (super mega lollllll)

All things are possible as long as everyone gets one vote and one vote counts as one vote

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well duh. The minute Facebook bought it they were gonna work towards undermining it to get the ad data

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can’t argue with that

Except for if you’re dying of starvation an apple is more valuable than gold and Bitcoin together :D

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could certainly do those things but when you really really strip it all back

  1. it’s only valuable because we humans agree it is

  2. those are all great applications for gold but which of those can the average person really do with their gold

I’m not saying Bitcoin is any better on those points (it’s not). I’m just saying that at the root of it it’s only valuable because people/society agree it is.

It’s 100% a much safer bet because it’s been valuable since basically the dawn of time and because it’s physical and shiny it has an inherent appeal that there’s just not there with digital money

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are not wrong.

But I see it as kind of a modern alternative to burying your loot somewhere in the hopes of evading capture and keeping the money.

9
wethepepe 9 points ago +9 / -0

you know, i saw @Jack (cuck)'s twitter post about banning Trump

He seemed to be pushing bitcoin. This is a guy who also runs/ran a credit card processing company (Square)

it dawned on me, maybe he's really into bitcoin because he knows if the asset seizures happen then bitcoin is the only way he can squirrel away a lot of his wealth AND prevent the government from being able to force anyone to hand it over.

10
wethepepe 10 points ago +10 / -0

gotta watch out for those sweet old grandmas waving miniature american flags during their undocumented tour of the Capitol

4
wethepepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

I keep telling them there's no proof anyone entered the capitol

then when they send pictures/videos

I just reply and say "they were supposed to be there. this isn't out of the ordinary. no evidence!"

10
wethepepe 10 points ago +10 / -0

Screw it.

We should be contacting CNN's advertisers and demanding they pull their ads.

Do they really want their name associated with people who gave a platform to violent rioters attacking the sacred seat of democracy

52
wethepepe 52 points ago +52 / -0

Trump had previously tweeted Marks content. So he definitely has some awareness of what he says.

Very interesting.

Here’s hoping! Because he is facing the very definition of a insurrection.

No, not the bunch of naughty bois n gals in the capital being shot while unarmed.

I’m talking about stealing an election, establishment covering up and refusing to allow the evidence to come to light, trying to be setup by the previous administration, 2 impeachment’s after nothing wrong etc etc.

8
wethepepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

Can anyone explain why the lawsuits were dropped?

Obviously Matt is confident in his findings because of how diligently he worked to ensure they were accurate

So who dropped them and why??

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›