And maybe the income tax will still be temporary.
We are pretending the Babylonian captivity didn’t happen?
President Trump won’t let us down.
Useful idiots for corporate fascism are just as bad as useful idiots for communism.
Live free, or die.
Hey, what was the lebensborn? The SS were creepy as fuck.
We have the toppest keks, don’t we folks
Correct. They hate one another.
Nah, President Trump will prevail.
Someone should send out the code for Julian Assange’s insurance file then.
Covid is gay,
Make the commies pay,
Open carry every day,
That is the way.
That, and the election was stolen.
Free Assange!
Them and the voat refugees trying to pretend we're all nazis.
Our kids will not believe these stories, honestly.
Ah neat trick. I’m not a regular “you”tube viewer.
I don’t dispute the facts I heard in the segment you sent to me.
Of course, the Jewish Bolsheviks, as they were contemporaneously called, managed all of this because they had convinced their subjects that the evil fascists were coming to kill them all and sell their kids.
And underlying it all (fascism and communism and the polarization or Europe leading, inevitably, to war) was funding from British Israelites and other globalist bankers.
This is why I believe it is folly to think that either of fascism or communism were “the good guys.” Both were banker created golems, neither harmed banker interests in any way, and while everyone was exhausting themselves with the struggle, the bankers ratcheted their hooks in the world’s financial systems even tighter.
Translation? I don’t speak yiddish or whatever that is
You have a point about “victors writing history,” but many of the contemporary accounts we have are from Hitler and Germany.
Most in Germany outside of the SS had no idea what was happening (bankers were funding two incompatible ideals to polarize society and spark another war). They thought fascism was an organic and correct response to the banking crisis and spectre of communism raised by the bankers. But corporate fascism is, from a banker’s perspective, indistinguishable from communism in that it completely subordinates the economy to the government.
It’s clear they show that the Germans botched the war effort on many, many fronts (partly because they never wanted it in the first place and you’ll remember they never invaded Russia until the allies declared war).
Russia would never have managed to force its troops into an invasion of Germany. They’d have revolted. Someone got the message to Hitler, “we need the Germans to come to us.” And so they did.
I just don’t think it was a massive conspiracy during the 40s to make Nazis look bad or something, they just used the war victory to do that in the aftermath.
The globalist zionist bankers did not leave the fate of the world up to a life and death struggle between two roughly equal powers, both of which had theretofore been cultivated by those same bankers. Their modus operandi is “ordo ab chaos”, not “roll the die and see where fate takes us.”
He wanted colonies in Russia. Yes, it sounds like an insane idea, but HE WROTE ALL ABOUT IT IN ADVANCE. Just read basically anything he wrote like Mein Kampf, you will find it in plain black and white text.
I’m aware, but you are assuming he would smash his empire’s chances just to kill some Slavs. He never wrote about doing that!
He let them go because he thought he could make peace with the Brits like he had done so many times before. Yes, again, it was foolish and he was pretty far from being a superb military commander. It happened. It is recorded. He even later expressed regret for his error.
He also wrote a lot about freemasons, but he didn’t smash his empire’s chances just to kill freemasons. Quite the opposite, he bent over backwards to accommodate their ruler, the British crown.
So why invade Russia? He already had lebensraum to halfway through Poland, and surely recognized that if he cut off the banker funding the Jewish Bolsheviks depended upon, the Jewish Bolsheviks would wither and die.
But, how would ending the war prematurely allow the bankers to maximize their profit by lending to both sides, with the understanding that the winner would pay the loser’s debts?
The Swiss are neutral, sometimes notoriously so. Half of Germany are Catholic. He merely respected that, it wasn't a huge conspiracy to make his country lose the war and tank Western civilization.
The swiss bankers are also zionist jews and freemasons. As is the city of london. In what sense could he have understood them as being neutral?
That is an insane theory with literally no evidence whatsoever.
The victors write the history, not the losers.
The bankers caused the crash of 1929. They had a solution to the crash ready to go, corporate fascism. They built the fascists up with funding at the same time as they built up their enemies, the communists up. They made both sides promise to pay the reparations of the loser (lesson learned post WW1). Then they cut ‘em loose.
How is it more insane than “Hitler the anti zionist ignored all the zionists in his struggle to rid the world of zionists and secure a future for Germany”?
The historical record, or what is left of it, is most probably accurate, yes. It's frequently contorted by the Western press to confirm bias towards a certain narrative, that is all. But I guess you could convince yourself of practically anything if you don't need evidence and you can just claim that whatever record supports your theories was supplanted millions of "fake" documents.
How come history books from the 40s and 50s don’t mention the holocaust? How would we have learned about the camps if they were all on the soviet side of the iron curtain?
He hated communists and Slavs, printed tons and tons about them in his publications and the nationalist papers.
So, forget about Deutschland uber alles, forget about the reich of a thousand years, Hitler had some slavs to kill?
It’s nonsense. He took a dive.
Is this even a serious question? Hitler was chancellor of Germany, not "the Vatican, City of London, Switzerland, etc. etc. etc."
He was head of the strongest army in Europe and he let the City of London’s troops go at Dunkirk, then marched past the other two banking centres and into the Russian winter, to certain defeat.
By the way, it's not "my story," it's just historical record. You don't need to substitute everything with a badass occult narrative, you know.
So it is your position that the historical record on Hitler is accurate?
In your story, why’d Hitler invade Russia?
Why’d Hitler ignore the bankers in the Vatican, City of London, and Switzerland?
The German rank and file were noble patriots. Their movement started out righteous but was usurped by occult crossdressing faggots whose mission was to leave an unforgettable lesson in history as to why nationalism is bad, mmmmkay?
If they’d woken up, they’d have stabbed the hearts of the Hydra: Switzerland and the City of London, and the Vatican for good measure.
Instead they helped the Jewish Bolshevists kill millions of inconvenient Russian patriots who could never have been convinced to invade Germany, simultaneously killing the millions of German patriots who would have been inconvenient to what has been happening in Europe since the war ended.
Hopefully President Trump has woken up and built a wall around the sovereign District of DC. Next he should declare war and raze it.
Fren, half of America is ready to throw us in the camps.
Besides, the “German” death camps were all discovered by Jewish Bolsheviks on the Soviet side of the iron curtain. And they were discovered in places where the Jewish Bolsheviks had also been genociding Christian Slavs.
All is well that ends well though, the Holocaust was, at least, a very good reason to transplant Ashkenazi Jews to Israel, a place their people had never lived before but which England had ready for settlement since 1918 Balfour Declararion, and they moved there just in time to build a third temple and fulfill biblical prophecy. Lucky!
President Trump will prevail.