I thought the AstraZenica vaccine wasn’t even approved for use in the US
Bingo, this guy gets it. I see so many Patriots on here bitching and whining but doing JACK SHIT to change anything. If all we do is play the helpless victim, we're no better than the liberal fags.
Damn but I love McDonalds. Where am I going to eat?
Or whatever that gross shit is they put on their hair. Yuck!
Actually I’ve been on since the beginning. I have several accounts.
Those are her words. It’s on page 27 of her legal response:
Even if it’s not true, why is she giving the libtards any ammunition at all?
What meaning does it have?
It’s where the conditions for life are most favorable, and thus an excellent place to search for the existence of prior life.
What the fuck is twitter? Never heard of it. I only use parler.
Who you calling a pi hole?
Why is a lawyer using it?
What message?
Page 27 from her actual court filing:
no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact.
reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.
Why does he say “the press is using twisted legalese”? Didn't she and her lawyers write it?
But we did. I believed it when she said Dominion was faking votes. That’s the point, she’s saying we shouldn’t.
It’s not the only thing they wanted to say. It’s one of five arguments.
Yup, that’s earlier on page 27 when it’s citing precedent but then she goes on to say that this applies to her as well:
Analyzed under these factors, and even assuming, arguendo, that each of the statements alleged in the Complaint could be proved true or false, no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact.
“The statements” are the allegations of fraud she made.
That’s just one of the arguments in her filing. But the one that says she made it all up is III.D.3.
Here’s the unedited sentence from the court filing (page 27):
no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact.
reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process.
Source: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20519858/3-22-21-sidney-powell-defending-the-republic-motion-to-dismiss-dominion.pdf (page 27)
Here’s the unedited sentence from the court filing:
no reasonable person would conclude that the statements were truly statements of fact.
Source: https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/20519858/3-22-21-sidney-powell-defending-the-republic-motion-to-dismiss-dominion.pdf (page 27)
Yes she did. Here’s her legal filing with the court:
Newsflash: There are white Muslims. They’re not all brown. Muslim is a religion, not a race.
Seems kinda gay to me
I did Nazi that coming 😂
What was the bill though? It’s rarely as black and white as this.
Nice try Russian bots.
Edit: now watch the bots downvote and deport this post....