And people who test positive and go through the quarantine, keep retesting to determine when they are 'free' from the virus. Every positive they get is another positive lumped into the country/state totals, falsely inflating the numbers.
I stumbled on a YT video of Lou Dobbs hosting Sidney Powell tonight - she released 4 names that I've never heard of to date, who she says are the main actors in the Dominion machines flipping votes. She also said she has new correspondence between these 4 men evidencing the discussion (of the election, I assume), she has evidence of Chinese money going to dominion a few weeks before the election and said evidence now ties in Canada and China. She mentioned Coomer's name too. And used the word 'illegal', which is pretty specific for an attorney; Although, until she can drill this down to a state-level and state specific activity, I can't see her work benefiting Trump for 2020 at this point.
The thing that Dobbs never asks, nor does anyone else, is 'so are these results you've mentioned enough to overturn the election in XX state? or are we still just stroking ourselves?"
The number is actually much higher than 49%, because if you add in all of the people who actually participated in the steal, they all know that it wasn't a fair election as well. They aren't going to riot in the streets though because the cheating helped their side. So, conservatively, 70% of Americans know it wasn't a fair election. The rest, mushrooms.
The 'acting appointments' for most of these positions have a 50 days limit unless they are the actual guys nominated for the permanent seat and going through confirmation. There are only a couple seats that don't have the 50 days limit. That's why these guys can't stay longer, they would never get through the confirmation because of partisanship issues.
I think this is cheerleading. For preservation of the base. These tweets aren't meant to take place of anything else. He's not a lawyer, you know his massive legal team isn't taking weekends and holidays off. There's still more to come.
I think that Dems were quiet and (knowingly, with the help of the Chinese) planned this 'everything but the kitchen sink' attack on Trump and the rest of us over the past 14 months in anticipation of throwing this election. This whole mess was their 'hill to die on' in their minds. They also knew that it is much harder to unravel this fraudulent election for Trump's side than for Dems to try to win it outright or with ploys like impeachment, etc. That's why they agreed to the Dominion stuff. All of the local fraud I think was organic level, not necessarily by organized design. Dems probably had a nationwide conference call and said "Here's what you can do locally, if you are good party members" (i.e. banning poll watchers, 'losing' trump ballots, marking 'iffy' ballots, the mailing of ballots to everyone, etc.) The Dominion 11p - 4a ballot dumps were clearly coordinated.
SCOTUS - since it was so one-sided a decision, I think the SCOTUS argument may have held water (not a lawyer) and that's why all 9 said they weren't giving relief sought. This tells me that the suit wasn't written correctly, somehow, and we now know how to formulate a better stab going through SCOTUS. It just wasn't going to stand going through the State-brought way.
SCOTUS members are people, too. They can see through the massive fraud in all of these states. As Dominion results come out, even more documentation and hard evidence can show a massive turn or diversion of votes. This just hasn't made it up to them yet. Additionally, they see that they will be diluted by adding an extra 3 Justices to the Court. I'm sure they don't want that situation and would want anything to happen to stop that.
Lastly, I think our Trump attorneys (as opposed to the Texas ones, no slight meant) are learning what the Justices in this current court are seeking in a suit. I am hopeful that we will get a proper filing through. If the SCOTUS didn't see a path to get a proper suit through, the conservatives would have had a harder time turning this down in such heavy number. You would have seen more Justices joining the dissent. The disappointment, though, is that our constitutionalist lawyers ( I suspect John Eastman was involved, and he's a heavyweight) didn't see this coming. (Aside, maybe they did, and will mention it later). Another disappointment that there wasn't EVERY RED STATE joining or providing amicus briefs to the court to show support.
Limit your food and liquid intake. Most people get kicked out once they leave the room for bathroom/lunch break. Not permitted back in the room.