Would help tremendously. Exspically now that meetup and facebook bans events that aren’t rioting from their platforms.

Youtube just said if you DISCUSS anything that they determined was obtained in an 'unauthorized' manner that is a ban-able offense IRRESPECTIVE OF THE TRUTH OR VALIDITY OF THE INFORMATION IN QUESTION!!

When a corporation/government office wants to attack a whistle blower in their own company his access to the data is retroactively 'clarified' to have been unauthorized ala "hacking" if an investigative journalist wishes to report on a story or a normal person wants to even bring it up they just made discussing DEMONSTRABLE FACTS the equivalent of saying Eric Ciaramella.

Furthermore if a Whist blower maintains his anonymity he cannot prove it wasn't a "hack' imagine if the only stories the MSM could report on was information from Named Sources.

Removing content that contains hacked information, the disclosure of which may interfere with democratic processes, such as elections and censuses. For example, videos that contain hacked information about a political candidate shared with the intent to interfere in an election.

TOS: https://blog.youtube/news-and-events/an-update-on-how-youtube-supports-elections/

So to any whistle-blowers or investigative journalists out there the only time us Americans or you can be allowed to discuss your information is when doing so will have NO impact on how American see their country or move them to call for political action on the basis of the factual information.

What a beautiful Catch 22, They should start by banning anyone DISCUSSING, Daniel Elseberg and Edward Snowden, henceforth.