It's even worse than that. Anyone who remembers the early versions of Facebook, everything was VERY private which was how they got everyone to start sharing personal data. Then over time, they kept stripping away privacy. That's why I deleted as much as I could and left 12 years ago.

If GDPR comes to the US, I'm going to demand they actually delete my old account and data, since it's probably just soft-deleted.

Sorry, but you have to riot to be eligible for your government-subsidized mask.

He wants his city to burn down so he can get federal aid, and be lauded as a hero of the people.

As someone who has been speaking out against the W.H.O. for months, this is REALLY exciting.

Hahaha, he's such a troll! I mean that in the jokster-sense of the term.

He's absolutely right, about when the looting starts, the shooting starts. I've started shopping for a gun, and am glad I'm in a state where you are allowed to protect yourself and property with violence, and without retreat.

I meant clarification from Trump about what he meant. I don't give a fuck about CNN

I think the left is afraid of the day they can no longer use race-baiting to silence their opponents.

By inciting riots, where most of the rioters are black, it only feeds racism against blacks, and of course racism from blacks against whites as well. A lot of the riot-apologists are saying dumbass shit like "they're oppressed" as if that makes it okay. In other words "It's okay to engage in theft, arson, violence and rioting because you're a minority."

If some naive person hears that, and then goes out rioting, looting, and burning down a store ... isn't the riot apologist bears some responsibility for what happened to the victim(s) of that riot. It may fall within the realm of free-speech, but it's outright fucking immoral.

It implies many falsehoods:

• All of the business owners have insurance, or they should be punished for not buying it
• That insurance covers those incidents
• Theft and destruction is okay, when you're stealing from insurance
• Burning down your city is okay because ... instance

The people apologizing for the rioters are made of the same scum as the rioters. The only difference is they're sitting behind a computer, and either a pansy or not close enough to the riot to join in. They're the same fucking scum.

It sounded like they were asked to move a few times, and were playing dumb, at which point only the reporter was arrested.

It has been for a while, at least on any content that is even remotely political, such as corona-virus content.

https://lbry.tv/@redicetv:1/insider-expose-google-and-youtube:d

^ If anyone doesn't know why google search is deceptive and should not be used.

If it wasn't staged, the audio made it sound like they were asked to move and tried to play dumb and not move out of their way.

The problem is that the clause was almost unequivocally referring to violence and porn, but federal courts (who knows why) began interpreting "otherwise objectional" as anything that a platform finds offensive. As such, social media platforms were able to ban and censor speech just because they found it offensive. Thus, exerting control and still immune under the language of 230(c)(2)(A).

That language appears to suggest they could single me out because I prefer a society without government, think the food-pyramid is invalid, or think the W.H.O. is spreading lies, or any number of other objectionable opinions I might have, or liberal race-baiting is racist, or...

I hope that part is clarified in the near future, because free speech is all about "objectionable" speech.

That seems possible, we'll have to wait for clarification. I can definitely understand how people come to both interpretations.

I hope there's a review of footage after this is over, and people identified shop-lifting and destroying property are punished according to the law & forced to compensate those harmed.

When I Was growing up, I thought making threats against the president was a Federal crime that would get you arrested. Was that a myth?

I'm an anarchist of sorts, and this is NOT burning down the system. They're not targeting government entities. It's just theft, violence, and destruction by selfish cunts against innocent persons. At the end of the day, these looters will want their welfare and unemployment checks in the mail.

What the fuck is wrong with those monsters? The protests now need to be against the fuckers who are destroying property and lives. This is not acceptable.

I'm not a lawyer, but my personal opinion is that sites need to be honest about their purpose. You wouldn't expect a Christian website forums to be obligated to publish Atheist content, or vice-versa. However, if you claim to be a neutral platform, it seems logical that you should mostly just act as a communication medium and not interfere with the message.

... and businesses decide to move out of the region.

It wasn't because of AR-15s, it was because they weren't running around like violent assholes, destroying property, stealing goods, and setting shit on fire.

T_D is better off over here. Reddit should be slapped with a giant lawsuit though.

Make Twitter self-destruct.

Hopefully all, including Google, because they manipulate search results.

I was worried about what he might do (still am), but if he labels them as a publisher but doesn't take any other action .... that would be fireworks.

Wearing a mask, while eating or drinking just silly. You have to remove the mask, touch the mask, or insert a straw behind it, which undermines it's effectiveness.