2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Deleted mine. Was harder than I thought it would be. Clean break though.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

As much as I agree with getting away from twitter, we do need to keep an eye on the other side's communications.

Screen shot that fucker. And if it's really bad make an archive to prove it's real.

5
WiseOldOwl 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, that's why I'm investing in a puckle gun. Doesn't use rounds.

It uses squares.

(No, seriously.)

5
WiseOldOwl 5 points ago +6 / -1

Just to think. That box of ammo is worth as much as everything else in this photo.

9
WiseOldOwl 9 points ago +9 / -0

Really? All mine have '5 rounds. Do not overload" written in the side in black magic marker.

I think I only have 5 round mags. Even the drum.

1
WiseOldOwl 1 point ago +1 / -0

I rather think you are giving communist leadership too much credit in the 'having any idea what you are doing' department.

3
WiseOldOwl 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whatever you think of Thatcher, she was no wuss. Hardassed bitch from hell.

1
WiseOldOwl 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's not to say we don't have actual communists on the other side. We do. They are mostly pawns or the actual Chinese agents undermining us. BLM for example, total pawns. The super rich running things have no intention of doing actual communism, they might label it that, but if they win, they will stay extremely rich, just like high ranking party members are in China.

Still, even the Chinese's version of communism is getting off track by "communist standards." Awful lot of Mercedes in the CCP parking lot.

1
WiseOldOwl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because communism is idiotic. And really, deep down, there is no such thing as communism, which is why it always fails and you end up with a dictatorial slave state.

What we just had was basically a fascist coup by the super rich in conjunction with the Chinese "Communists." And I use fascist in the sense of the term Benito meant when he called it the merger of state and corporate power.

Everyone wanted Trump gone so they could get the Chinese money flowing, or because of their left wing religious fanaticism, or (in the case of the Chinese) so they could keep expanding without anyone getting in the way.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

TBH, if we could just take all the good people and get them to a safe distance, it would be amusing to watch what happens.

Will the pawns eventually mob the globalists and murder them, or will the globalists dispose of the pawns first?

Because make no mistake. Both are using each other and plan to get rid of each other later.

71
WiseOldOwl 71 points ago +73 / -2

Clapping is triggering. Do jazz hands.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a difficult balance to be sure. If you go too pure, you have you, me, that guy over there, and that's it. Not enough votes to get a cup of coffee.

Heck, might not even let Trump in since he was too soft on the democrats.

You go too open, you might as well let in AOC and the squad and Osama Bin Laden and Bernie Sanders....

12
WiseOldOwl 12 points ago +12 / -0

Nah, it's more like trying to get as big a party as you can, and being willing to water down your stuff to the lowest common denominator.

Big tent is shit because they don't actually have standards. It's part of how we got in this mess. Imagine chasing the gender nut vote because you want a bigger tent instead of putting gender nuts in asylums.

5
WiseOldOwl 5 points ago +5 / -0

Marxism, any leftism, is totally a religion. Just look at how leftists act.

That's religious nuts without the religion. Leftism stands in for it.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't blame anyone for shit spelling. I do blame them for shit logic, like "I'll vote for the dumbass and nothing bad will happen."

7
WiseOldOwl 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah. Basically suppose you are the super rich, you've married China, and you are shopping for a president.

You get to the store, look around, and ask the clerk "Is this really the best you got?"

Clerk tells you it is.

"Oh well, I guess we'll take the Biden. Seems the most controllable. And I dunno, what do you have in brown? Stacy? I can't lift that. Kamala? Isn't it a bit used? All you got eh?"

13
WiseOldOwl 13 points ago +13 / -0

Infiltration is great if you do it. Trouble is most of us really just don't want to live a lie.

But those of us who don't mind it really should get on with the applications.

1
WiseOldOwl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Biden is trying to get as much money out of this country as he can before it falls.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

That may change. Kitten personality evolves. Give him every reason to be confident, and get him a little friend BEFORE he gets territorial. It'll be too late soon.

4
WiseOldOwl 4 points ago +5 / -1

Go back. Get a sibling.

No, do it. Do it now.

You have no idea the love a cat will give it's sibling when they aren't fighting, and they keep each other company when you are gone.

The correct number of cats is two.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, but this is.... more complex than it should be.

We aren't hunter gatherers anymore who expend massive energy getting food. Our lifestyles have changed and they aren't going to go back.

We may never be free of the overall set of effects, but at present the scales are misaligned for many to get where they need to be. It's more of an uphill battle for many than is anything close to just.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was kind of hoping that was the case.

Bugs me no end when people take an animal, that they most likely do care about, and name it something awful, like 'snots.'

1
WiseOldOwl 1 point ago +2 / -1

Seriously, you will love this pet, don't give it the name of someone you don't care for. Give it a name that shows you respect it.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›