0
WitchRolina 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stop with this conspiracy crap. This is what screwed everything up in the first place.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, but why is this a sticky?

3
WitchRolina 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they've already stripped trump of his ability to do anything. You want something declassified? Don't seek permission. Grab it and release it.

5
WitchRolina 5 points ago +6 / -1

How much freedom does it allow? I know Parler is a bit authright for my taste - is Gab more Libright? Does it pass the "porn test"?

Parler IMO is doomed because it doesn't support the one thing that has been kingmaker for tech...

3
WitchRolina 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't give a damn about documents, they control the flow of information. What they fear are we creating our own versions of these things and bypassing their attempts to un-person us. Once we have our own systems in place, they can't stop us.

Never let one side control infrastructure again.

5
WitchRolina 5 points ago +5 / -0

They made a browser yes, but I haven't been able to update it in forever. Off chance you know how to get the most recent update? What the browser links me to is the same outdated version it is...

2
WitchRolina 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was time to do this years ago...

0
WitchRolina 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stop calling the left communists. They support Socialism for the rich, and Capitalism for the poor. That's happened before. The proponent called it "the lucrative merger of corporation and state".

That man was Benito Mussolini.

But it gets better. There was that other guy - the one who agreed with Mussolini, but decided to be ultra racist too, commanding people be attacked and punished based on how they were born.

Funny how the left agrees with that guy, both in economic and racial policy... just with a different scapegoat.

Call them what they are.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Okay, read that first comment of yours.

You realize everyone left their guns at home because "DC doesn't allow it", right? No guns is why we couldn't hold ground at all.

2
WitchRolina 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or, you know, if they had the brains to bring guns. If everyone practiced 2A, there wouldn't be shit they could have done. But everyone willingly disarmed.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

THEY CONTROL THE COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS. And you gave them an excuse to enact authoritarian control.

Push button, disable website. All they have to do is convince the service owner we tried to commit political violence, which given they control the press, isn't hard.

You have too much faith in people.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah, sounds like they're womenstruating again...

4
WitchRolina 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't just bend over and take it up the ass because they "ordered the violation of the 2nd ammendment". Take the guns anyways, and do so en mass. They can't enforce unconstitutional edict if we're all packing.

3
WitchRolina 3 points ago +3 / -0

Best put your money where your mouth is then. Worst thing you could do is prove the doomers right by thinking that what needs to be done will be done by "someone else".

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Throw off the Elephants too.

Lions only.

4
WitchRolina 4 points ago +5 / -1

Amend it, not end it. They want an excuse to end it. Let lets them curate who is and isn't allowed to talk with impunity. Right now, they still have to play into freedom of speech, but we all know if they get the chance to say "ooops, we had to do it so we don't get sued", they will use it as a method to silence any dissent.

Instead, change it to only disallow what is illegal, and then enforce it strictly, and without mercy.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Platitudes are nice, but make sure you're ready to act. When the time comes, we can't be caught with our pants down saying "someone should do something". WE are someone, we have to be the ones to do it.

First take out their communications infrastructure and forbid them that advantage. Then take out their legal corruption, and forbid them the subversion of rule of law. Then go after the indoctrination, and purge the marxists who try to corrupt the young. Only then are we free to look up at the elites, and bring them down.

It means nothing if we just trim the top of the weed. You destroy the corrupt by killing them at their roots - destroy the base of their power, and the rest will follow.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

...No, not republicans, sir. The republicans want to stab you in the back too. We can't let them do it either.

We'll stand with you against all the establishment swamp monster, no matter what their party may be.

34
WitchRolina 34 points ago +36 / -2

Don't terminate section 230, just fucking enforce it. The only reason social media is allowed to do their bullshit is because nobody is enforcing it. They're all in violation of it.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, we did. But we did nothing to stop their cheating, and we all knew they were going to do it. We should have done more to prevent them from committing the fraud in the first place.

I mean, it's the Democrats. We all know that if they didn't cheat, it'd have been Sanders and not Hillary in 2016.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, yes. I'm a Darwinist. If you die because I didn't wear my mask right, the gene pool thanks you for your sacrifice.

1
WitchRolina 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember: Take out their communications infrastructure first. The legacy media and tech platforms are their biggest advantage - neutralize those, and we won't have to deal with the infrastructural disadvantage that destroyed the superior fighters in the first civil war.

2
WitchRolina 2 points ago +6 / -4

Sounds like you need to do a bit more research on that one buddy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›