Tim Pool is a liberal. That means on most issues, he isn't actually on your side. The one thing you can count on him for is honesty. He will honestly speak on his thoughts and beliefs. That doesn't mean he isn't human, and can't be demoralized into believing the leftist line. It just means he'll be up front with you and explain why he thinks a certain way, and show you what made him think that. You will note he has stopped asking where the evidence is, and is instead quoting the evidence at every article he reads that says 'no evidence'.
The biggest thing he believes in is maintaining proper journalistic standards. So, ye, he will hedge a lot, because he doesn't view it as his job to guide anyone's opinions or positions. He'll give the facts as he sees them, say what he actually thinks, then backtrack a little to remind you to think for yourself, that he's only the one guy, he could easily be wrong, reality could easily play out counter to his expectations, get information from more places than him.
People want him to be a banner carrier, and get angry at him for not doing so, but that's not what he wants to be. He doesn't want to join a side, because he wants to be able to report the issues of both sides. And its very important to have a neutral observer to point out when our side is going too far. Don't get me wrong, I find his unwillingness to just commit to a statement frustrating too, but I also respect that he doesn't want to be a prognosticator or a partisan.
Tim Pool is not a sellout, or a fence sitter, or trash. He has a specific set of principles that mostly do not align with what we wish they would be, and he is unwilling to compromise his principles.
Say waht you want about Obama, that motherfucker campaigned like hell. Joe Biden didn't match him at fucking all, yet we're supposed to believe these polls that had him ahead literally everywhere with basically no appearances?
Who the fuck is this guy and why are people spamming him as if he is credible? Genuinely, OP, please explain why you trust his word. Has he broken important stories? Has he actually demonstrated insider knowledge that was later proven true?
If Kyle Rittenhouse was a Muslim, I would still support his right to kill rioters threatening his life. If he was from Mars, I'd still support his right to self defense. Fuck those black bloc bastards, I wish he'd shot more. Maybe fewer would riot if they realized they were painting targets on themselves by being violent.
Alex stepped over the line on a hostile platform. You could literally see the moment hebwas going to get the video taken down when he declared that he wanted people put up against the wall and shot. Youtube was looking for literally any excuse, and he handed that to them on a golden platter.
This is them literally editorializing, somebody fucking sue them.