Are you sure he wasn't kidding? I don't really watch much of him (I need satire of the left like I need even more unactionable evidence of voter fraud) but he goes hard against the Left's sacred cows, why would he cuck on this one?

Also, Malcolm X didn't say this yesterday. There certainly was oppression, the Democrats were more honest back then about their feelings towards blacks. LPS you're on some bullshit right now

.....is that the dude from Red Hot Chili Peppers next to Ronald McDonald?

BTW, I am not sure of what incentives perpetuated race in Singapore, or whether that applies to the US. The point is, either segregate or eliminate race. The only losing strategy is keeping racial distinction while making each group live together, which of course is the reason America's enemies push that strategy.

Bro, I wrote you a long reply but it didn't take, I guess. The gist was, I agree with you that multiple races inside the same society weaken it, and humans are inherently tribalistic.

However, I posit that:

1. Tribes can be oriented around more than just superficial appearance. Factors such as religion (Islam, Christianity), prolonged shared geography (Mexican natives and Spaniards), overwhelming force (the conversion of distinct African ethnic groups into the artificial "Black" category) etc have historically eliminated ethnic groups by combining them with others.

2. Humans naturally want to blend, typically only artificial political incentives prevent it (Spanish caste systems, anti-miscegenation laws, subversive Cultural Marxist Buzzfeed articles about fighting whiteness by not dating whites)

3. In the West, race is a system, a system created in order to treat people differently. Slave sellers and their customers needed to explain why it was okay for Christians to keep slaves, and a hasty categorization based on appearance was the birth of "Black". It was invented out of necessity from incentive. Today, the incentive for "Black" persists with everyone from the known race hustlers and authors to college sophomore girls who need a cause to belong to benefiting from its existence. The other distinct racial categories have their own reasons for existing. When the incentive for a concept in a culture to exist disappears, it disappears.

There's more to it, and this isn't as good as what I first wrote lol. I respectfully disagree and I am sure you are not convinced, but please try to see things as I do from my position.

Hey, same. I started as basically an Anarchist but I realized that those who fail to create high standards of vigliance and good behavior wind up living by the standards of a more effective culture. I'm not a Conservative by any means and I tend to favor dangerous possibilities over safe same-old same-old (adaptability and flexibility is also essential to cultural survival) but you gotta be smart about diversity and realize there's a right way to do it.

A varied diet is helpful, but Dems have been selling us a varied diet that is all junk food, then gain power from the chaos.

Your willingness to offend the sacred cows and say the naughty words and mess around with people different (non-violently( is actually the basis of peace and strong assimilation. I always think of the scene in Gran Torino where he calls his besr friend ethnic slurs.

And this concludes another episode of "Dating as an Urban Republican".

Diversity is supposed to be the basis for a stronger consolidation.

1. Don't incentivize people to prioritize their ethnic affiliations over their civic ones and not assimilate

2. Don't incentivize the native population to not criticize the new population or appropriate useful parts of it.

3. Don't take foreigners that have no chance in hell of doing number 1.

4. The only demographic data used for legal purposes shall be as follows: A. Citizen B. Lawful Resident 3. Going back where they came from

Guys I did it I succeeded in the balancing act of not being Nazi Germany and not being Somalia.

This should be top comment

And I prefer them to Democrats in every way. If only I ever have to try explaining that to myself ten years ago.

Who originally made it?

???

How about you interpret the law and let Donald worry about national security Roberts you previously unimaginable cuckold

Lol

She's a lawyer though?

Someone accidentally press the 'save' button?

I know a lot of Liberals and none of them will advocate for sex perverts. What's more likely is they'll claim that there must be one wirh Trump that was redacted and that they never liked Democrats anyway and they voted for Jill Stein

Dude I actually just realized that I'm the only Trump supporter I know IRL. I've been advocating literal crucifixion of censors and the elimination of any recognizing of American citizens as being any ethnicity other than American, and I complain about Chynah every day, and everyone loves me. They never put it together and they never even suspect. I guess since I don't wear a Klan hood to work they assume I can't like Don

Honestly it sounds like a lot of stuff the media would praise Democrats for doing. I'm a queer quarter-jew and I think he's pandering lol.

It's almost like he isn't far-right at all!

I am working on a system like this as well. We need to be active pedes, it's not just about primarying a RINO, we need to send forth suitable replacements. Furthermore in the ideally un-dominionized world of the future, we need more Republicans in areas where Dems run unopposed.

Replace everything down to the fucking coroner.

It'll be a lot of research, emailing and phone calls, maybe the states.win idea will be a good way to break up the workload.

One of the the richest men in the world and he gets a damp six? Android or gay.

This should be the top comment

Thanks, the rest of the Farmers Insurance theme song played in my head right after I read that

Yuge honor!

"HONEY DO YOU THINK I HAVE A WHITE SAVIOR COMPLEX?!"