2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I were dying and someone leaned on my neck, I'd die! That's murder! ReEEEE!

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it's "metaphysical" then explain what's getting put up that kids asshole.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not really, The shadow rapes him.

29
XxxRDTPRNxxX 29 points ago +29 / -0

I unclenched my asshole and pooped everywhere. HALP!!

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

They call it that because they just established the precedent that they can strip constitutional rights away to deal with a "public health crisis". So obviously guns are now a health crisis so they can be taken, and racism will be one next so they can take free speech.

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only thing Kyle did wrong was missing Gaige Grosskreutz.

11
XxxRDTPRNxxX 11 points ago +12 / -1

Idiot libtards on reddit: "LOL. No one cares about syrup. Nice strawman."

Also idiot libtards on reddit: "Just don't be racist if you don't want your business destroyed... It's not that hard."

19
XxxRDTPRNxxX 19 points ago +19 / -0

Yeah, he prefers pressure cookers. That's why he doesn't need an AR.

7
XxxRDTPRNxxX 7 points ago +7 / -0

How can they be banned from McDonald's if they aren't allowed in the country? Proof they aren't racist.

8
XxxRDTPRNxxX 8 points ago +8 / -0

I wonder if black people are allowed to vote in china.

2
XxxRDTPRNxxX 2 points ago +2 / -0

You guys know that "visibly unarmed" is total bullshit, right? Michael Brown was "visibly unarmed". Cops can't do an ocular patdown like Mac.

The lady that got shot was with a mob of people climbing over a barricade to rush towards the cop.

If I were a cop on the other side of that barricade I'd have shot too rather than let her swarm me or run past and then have to make a determination if the other 100 people following her were also "visibly unarmed".

Trump won the election, but that woman played a stupid game and won a stupid prize.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

The text is clearly enlarged and less blurry than twitter handle. This is obviously a composite of 2 images.

7
XxxRDTPRNxxX 7 points ago +7 / -0

"It disproportionally effects people of color!! That's RAYCISM!! MLB is RACIST! REEEE!!!"

These lines write themselves.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Without the step of equality before GOD, there would be no equality under the law, or people picking their own leaders.

Right, I agree with that. One idea grows forth from an existing framework of ideas that came before. I'm not trying to discount the Christian influence on the modern world because it's obviously huge.

I'm just saying that this idea of equality under the law was the result of the constitution and USA as the key factors, not theological study. There were tons of Christian countries for 2,000+ years and this idea never became mainstream until the USA formed it's government around it and started kicking ass on the world stage.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Equality under the law, and the idea that people pick their own leaders rather than god picking them are also major shifts that have occurred in the last couple hundred years.

That idea is the result of the declaration of independence, constitution, and ascendency of the USA, not the result of Christian theology.

No one wants to think their way of life (free citizen with the right to vote) is against the will of god, So people in this country who were born within this system went back and re-interpreted what they needed to in order to say that this was actually the correct interpretation of ancient scripture all along.

The truth is the scripture is so vague and cryptic, and says so much on so many subjects that practically anyone can come up with a theological argument to support anything, and have a solid backing in scripture to support those ideas.

If commies win and completely take over the country, Get ready for communist Jesus who told his followers to redistribute all their belongings to the poor to become the new "correct" interpretation of the bible that was there all long, and no one understood it correctly until now.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fact is that IN PRACTICE Christianity was never about empowering the masses on a political level or taking down the class structure of ancient times.

You can tell me how the Devine right of kings is a corruption of the intent of the religion, but you don't have the authority to just dictate the "correct" interpretation of the bible, Certainly not more so than the early popes and scholars from long before we were born.

If you're going to tell me their interpretations weren't correct, and you don't accept their authority to decide these matters, then you should understand that also applies to YOUR modern interpretations. You also lack the authority to dictate these things.

So therefore it's completely useless to try and decipher the "correct" meaning from a religion, and it's instead far more useful to study how they were actually implemented IN PRACTICE. Because those practice are what created our modern world.

The fact is throughout most of western history the concept of people being equal before god was looked at as a spiritual matter.

The king was equal to a peasant in the sense that they would both face judgement after they die, they could both be sent to hell, they could both earn a place in heaven, etc...

But this idea that equality before god should translate into the real world and that people should be treated equally by the state is a very modern concept that would have been completely foreign to someone in the middle ages.

1
XxxRDTPRNxxX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well... I agree in principal, but lets be clear about one thing. Christianity is absolutely about kissing the ring.

In fact that's been the default state of Christianity for the majority of Western history.

I understand the whole "all men are created equal" thing, but the point is that's a relatively modern concept, and that position is a departure from traditional Christianity, or the "highjacking" if you will.

Christian monarchs and the elite in the ancient world have always derived their authority from religion, And Christianity is no exception.

15
XxxRDTPRNxxX 15 points ago +15 / -0

The problem is some people are not irreligious due to genuine skepticism but rather have simply been indoctrinated into a competing ideology, in which there being no god is one of the tenants of belief. But it's just as dogmatic and immune to logic as religion.

I'm an atheist and to me that term shouldn't come with any more baggage beyond not believing a god exists. But try going to r/atheism without being a raging leftist.

Try criticizing Islam there. They will ban you for it. Those people are fucking insane.

view more: Next ›