4
Yaemz123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Age should not be tied to voting at all. Only net taxpayers should vote, since they are voting by proxy on how the government spends tax money.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +3 / -0

I recently visited there for an extended business trip. Ride from my hotel to work was 15 minutes. I counted 86 homeless encampment along the route one day. That place is a soul-crushing nightmare from hell.

1
Yaemz123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, you can never root out communism. You can only slow it down and kill it off when it gets too large. Communist thought is loser thought, and whoever is the loser in society will almost always espouse it.

2
Yaemz123 2 points ago +2 / -0

You shoyldn't offer out free birth control and also expect a return to morals. Those are economic drivers in opposite directions.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +4 / -1

Those numbers rely on people not changing other choices after having a kid. Often, someone will have 1 or 2 abortions, then end up having a couple of kids as well. If the first ones were not aborted, likely the later ones would not have been conceived, especially if we stop giving people free money (welfare) for having kids and not working.

2
Yaemz123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jeez guy! Where's my NSFW warning!

1
Yaemz123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ip blocked? Hello Brave browser, hello Tor browser, hello every ip spoofer program in existence.

2
Yaemz123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Term for a shill account. Someone trying to "blend in" but so bad at doing so that they "glow in the dark" instead. Oh, and a shill is someone pretending to be on your side but secretly working for the enemy.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's just not true. There's a tribe in Africa that has been building 3 story wood or bamboo towers to dive off of for centuries. They ties vines around their ankles and jump off. The ones that don't die are considered men after that. See, they figured out multi-story buildings... to jump off of... that proves they must be smart... because... yeah...

1
Yaemz123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah folks, don't complain about the fake pic by pointing out it's fake! Just believe the ScIeNcE!

2
Yaemz123 2 points ago +2 / -0

You need all the upvotes. These fake claims get old and annoying fast.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +3 / -0

Anyone can always claim self-defense, but that doesn't make it self-defense. If it is proven you weren't in a rightful act of self-defense, you lose the "privilege" of self-defense.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +3 / -0

Whether I have a law degree or not has no bearing on the legal concept of privilege. Privilege is any right that only exists in the correct context. Attorney-client privilege only exists between an attorney and a client when acting in those capacities. If you are a lawyer and your drunk buddy confesses to a crime to you, you don't have attorney-client privilege. If you kill someone after you provoke them, you don't have self-defense privilege. These are basic legal concepts that have existed for centuries.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yes and since you can't always claim it, it is a privilege, in legalese.

9
Yaemz123 9 points ago +11 / -2

In legal terms, this is accurate. If you attack someone, then they fight back and you kill them, you can't claim "the privilege of self defense." The prosecutor is still a faggot commie, but the term is a correct one.

3
Yaemz123 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually, once you are an adult, a tetanus booster is never REQUIRED.

view more: Next ›