Yep. There are people in Philly who have lived and died never knowing anything other than a Democrat mayor.

Philly has had a Democrat mayor every time since 1952.

This has been explained to you a half dozen times a half dozen ways, that I am saying this isnt the case. Repent or burn in hellfire, you compulsive liar.

And now you're projecting. Yes, that IS the case. Nowhere have you presented a single solitary example of the Nazis "suing for peace". You claimed delegations but have failed to name names, dates, topics of discussion, or provide any kind of documentation regarding them.

Czechoslovakia isnt Britain.

Never said it was. But going to war with an ally tends to cause problems, nevermind you still ignore Denmark, Poland, France, Belgium, and Holland.

Sending over delegates to sue for peace isnt suing for peace?

Are you refrring to von Blomberg and Göring's visits in 1937 for George V's coronation or the presence of a German embassy in the UK? You know, things that existed and occurred prior to the invasions?

Because you are so fucking retarded that it needs to be explained that Czechoslovakia isnt Britain.

No, you're so fucking retarded that you keep saying that despite me never claiming such while deliberately ignoring that Czechoslovakia wasn't the only country involved and that countries tend to take issue with wars made on their allies.

Again, if China invaded Japan, why would that be considered "suing for peace" with the US? Why would you think that the US wouldn't get involved due to a hostile nation invading an ally?

If they wanted peace, they'd have never invaded in the first place you dumbass.

Yes they did, because by your logic, having a single war of aggression in the past makes all future wars wars of agression

Incorrect. Nowhere did I state such, either explicitly or implicitly. What does that have to do with the fact that the Nazis were socialists and nothing Hitler did could be construed as "suing for peace with the UK"?

No, it's like me breaking the ribs of a kid I knew in high school then fucking his sister. The fact that I beat him didnt change that I liked his sister.

So you broke your own ribs? Kinda weird.

You keep saying that Hitler was "suing for peace" with the UK but have continually failed to show what actions he took. However, what he did do was repeatedly invade countries that were allied with the UK. His actions directly refute your claim, nevermind that his own words show that he placed blame for WW1 onto the UK.

Sounds like it'd be time for a wopocaust.

So because the US started a war of aggression, the US is fundamentally the aggressor in every war it has been involved in since, and the other side has always been simply trying to defend itself.

But the US didn't start a war of aggression here.

Back up that claim or cut out your tongue

Already backed it up. Back your shit up or suck cock. Oh wait, you're already doing the latter.

Czechoslovakia isnt Britain

Again, I never said it was. Again, most countries tend to react with hostility when you invade their allies. Again, by your logic, China invading Japan would equate to them suing for peace with the US.

I'm still not sure how relevant this is to the topic, which is that the Nazis were socialists despite all of the commie infiltrators continually denying it.

Gee, it's almost like they could just overthrow the union.

Again, why is that relevant?

Because starting a war of aggression is the opposite of "suing for peace".

The US wasn't attacked by Britain by Poland, Denmark, Belgium, Holland, or France.

So? When did I say that they were?

So what?

Are you retarded?

No, Hitler didnt invade Czechoslovakia to sue for peace with Britain, it was a neutral action. Czechoslovakia isnt Britain

Yet you are claiming that Hitler was suing for peace by starting a war. He started said war by invading Czechoslovakia. It wasn't a "neutral action" at all.

Congress wouldn't approve, without which would violate the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. Incase you haven't noticed, Trump makes it a point to not make such gross violations of the law.

Czechoslovakia isnt Britain, so why does that matter?

I don't recall stating that it was. The point you keep deliberately ignoring is that he started a war of aggression with a country that was nominally allied with Britain. The same with Poland, Denmark, Belgium, Holland, and France.

Did the United States not invade the phillipines before pearl harbor?

Again, why is that relevant? The US wasn't attacked at Pearl Harbor by the Phillippines, nor did the US campaigns in the Phillippines have any bearing on the Japanese decision to attack the US at Pearl Harbor. Hell Hirohito wasn't even alive at the time.

Czechoslovakia isnt Britain

Again, so? They were nominally allied with Britain. How, precisely, is attacking a country's ally "suing for peace" with that country?

By your logic, China invading Japan tomorrow would equate to them "suing for peace" with the US.

It isn't meaningful at all. We already don't give a fuck about Trump's impeachments, so why do you think the Democrats would about Biden unless he was removed from office and convicted of criminal charges?

Did the United States not invade the phillipines before pearl harbor?

Why would that matter?

Your questions are meaningless.

Not at all. You claimed that Hitler was never intended to attack Britain, when his own words refute that very statement.

I have intentionally started fights well before I ever shot someone, that doesn't mean it wasn't self defense to shoot someone.

Yes, it is. If you start the fight, you are the aggressor, so you can't claim "self-defense" in that case.

Why do you need to continually act as if Hitler starting a war of aggression never happened?

Did Hitler not invade Czechoslovakia, Poland, Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, and France before the Battle of Britain? How is any of that "suing for peace"?

Not bullshit.

I have absolutely shot someone because I want peace.

No you stupid fuck. You don't get to break into someone's house, shoot at them, get shot in return, and then cry about wanting peace.

If you want peace, you don't engage in a war of aggression in the first place. You don't get to invade half a dozen countries and then try to claim that you only did so because you wanted peace with another country.

It does matter. Impeachment means fuck all if you don't actually convict for crimes.

Senate won't vote in favor, DOJ won't charge.

Given how he looks, he's bound to keel over on his own.

It's all about pre-election soundbites.

"Trump was convicted of fraud!"

You need taller shoes. The point is that you already had peace before you started aggressively expanding i.e. starting wars. You don't get to start a war and then cry about wanting peace.

This is the same dindu shit you see when some asshole breaks into a house and gets shot by the homeowner. "Oh he wuz a good boi he weren't gonna hurt nobody!"

He allowed Dunkirk to happen because he intended to sue for peace.

So he invaded Czechoslovakia, Poland, France, Belgium, Holland, and Denmark because he wanted to "sue for peace" with the UK?

Why do modern actors matter? You can go look at Hitler's own words.

http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Hitler%20Speeches/Hitler%20Speech%201941.01.30.html

Have you even read his speeches? He quite ltierally blames WW1 on what he describes as Britain's envy of Germany as an imperial power, which doesn't make any sense given that the German Empire never came close to matching the extent of the British Empire.

http://www.worldfuturefund.org/wffmaster/Reading/Hitler%20Speeches/Hitler%20Speech%201941.01.30.html

No he wasn't. You don't get to aggressively expand and then claim you were "suing for peace".

Incorrect. It was created by an Act of Congress and the Board of Governors is appointed by the President.

I guess we'll ignore that bodybuilders tend to die earlier on average.