Are you referring to Nixon in 1961? Please tell me you are. Please be stupid enough to equate these two situations.
Nixon awarded himself Hawaii's gasp 3 EC votes instead of awarding them to Kennedy, nevermind that Kennedy was ahead by over 100 EC votes. He only got away with it because it wouldn't have changed the outcome. It was a petty, last-minute "Fuck you" at best.
It doesn't matter that he did it you blithering fool. Anyone can do just about anything. The capacity to do something is not indicative of having the power or authority. Pence could've whipped out his dick and slapped every single member of Congress right in the face with it. Does that mean that such an action was within his authority as VP to do? No.
Again, cite the specific clause in the Constitution that grants the VP unilateral authority. I'm waiting.
Some proof of what? You're the one making claims that you're not willing (likely because you're not able) to support.
You never needed to be concerned with convincing me because I know you're arguing in bad faith. Roughly a million licensed medical doctors in the US alone, but you think your paltry shitheel experiences (that again you aren't willing to prove) matter? That's the height of egotistical nonsense.
Thinks his anecdotes are meaningful? Check.
Demands that others take them seriously when no proof has been offered? Check.
Resorts to "muh post history" when called out on a lack of good faith arguments? Check.
Claims that the replies of others are "bullshit", but keeps replying back like a dumb fish on a hook? Check.
I mean, this isn't a case of "believe what you wish". This is a case of you lacking sufficient data to make such a claim. Even if I presume that you're telling the truth, it's still only an anecdote and worth less than a squirt of piss in a tornado.
I love how people think Pinochet was a Fascist when his predecessor was pretty much a perfect match.
"Sigmund described how Allende deliberately used a combination of price controls and minimum wages to drive businesses into bankruptcy and then tried to expropriate them for “underperforming.”"
Pretty much a textbook example. Instead of overtly taking over private enterprise (like Communists), Fascists will let you keep your private business. The catch is that you must adhere to their regulations or else they will take over. They then proceed to increase the regulatory burden over and over.
Oh I'm contrarian? Is that what you call anyone that goes against the grain?
Please. How about you actually respond to counter-arguments in good faith instead of playing the worn-out "You aren't informed" card?
Here's a novel idea:
Put up or shut up.
Who said the legislators aren't taking power back?
Who said that a special council wasn't being formed?
Who said that evidentiary hearings weren't being worked on?
Your argument basically boils down to "Since I don't see it, it must not exist".
Why don't you "read what the damn thing said"? What part GIVES REPARATIONS AND FREE MONEY LOL
Answer the whole question you retard.
You're still sperging out over nothing. Where's the bill, hmm? Oh wait, there isn't one.
No, Pence did what he was supposed to do as per the Constitution. Nowhere does it give him unilateral authority, so he didn't exercise it.