-26
yesminister -26 points ago +10 / -36

No he didn't say that.

He said "big pharma" wants to inject you with mercury. That's from the retarded anti-vaxxer playbook.

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

Never said he couldn't. One makes you a bad president, one makes you a bad person.

Also, she didn't accuse him of rape, did she? Just some touching?

-39
yesminister -39 points ago +13 / -52

Haha why did you have to throw in mercury and formaldehyde in there? That destroys your whole point. You've obviously not researched it to determine that there are too many strains of the flu for a flu vaccine to be efficient. That would be some sort of argument at least.

No, you're just an anti-vaxxer that believes "big pharma" (scary companies!!!) wants to inject you with mercury because... reasons.

-6
yesminister -6 points ago +2 / -8

You had me until the last line.

I don't care what happened this long ago. I'm sure Biden did it but I don't care. It doesn't make him a worse president. Being a senile fucking idiot makes him a worse president.

Why do you people pretend to care so much but doesn't care about other accusations? You're as hypocritical as the leftists.

-6
yesminister -6 points ago +1 / -7

Ok, well you're clearly insane so goodbye.

-12
deleted -12 points ago +1 / -13
-6
yesminister -6 points ago +1 / -7

You literally just said so.

-6
yesminister -6 points ago +1 / -7

It's a one-on-one discussion. He's free to discuss it in his head if he'd like. What are you, the discussion police? This is the most retarded argument I've ever seen.

I shouldn't tell people to shut up about irrelevant things because they're FREE TO DISCUSS ANYTHING THEY WANT? That's your argument? Do you see how incredibly moronic it is?

-10
yesminister -10 points ago +2 / -12

Ah, I'm going to teach you something now. I'm going to teach you to use your brain. It's not much to work with, but perhaps you'll manage?

Try to follow this:

I said Musk is a fraud.

You said that Musk created multi-billion dollar companies in plenty of industries and succeeded. Therefore he's not a fraud, according to you.

I used Enron and Theranos as examples of once-successful companies that truly were frauds. In the midst of their success, someone like you would use the same argument you did to denigrate anyone who criticized them. (In fact, that happened plenty of times at least with Theranos and their female CEO who was untouchable in the media for reasons you surely understand.)

In other words, your argument is invalid. I'm not equating Tesla to Enron. I'm saying that Tesla's success has absolutely no bearing on them being a fraud or not.

Can you understand that?

Can you understand I wasn't listing "random shit" now? I used them as an example to show that your argument is stupid.

Cool.

-8
yesminister -8 points ago +1 / -9

I haven't said anything about his degrees.

You believe 5G is dangerous, so maybe you should not participate in discussions about engineering?

-10
yesminister -10 points ago +2 / -12

Hahaha here we go. The retarded conspiracy theories in full force.

I thought we weren't allowed to criticize people with success and money. Rules for me, not for you? Interesting!

How many 5G towers have you burned down?

-7
yesminister -7 points ago +1 / -8

Oh, congrats. This is currently the most stupid thing I've seen in this discussion so far.

Why would I want to discuss something irrelevant? Holy shit you're dumb.

-8
yesminister -8 points ago +2 / -10

Venture capitalists don't have ideas. They have money. Entrepreneurs have ideas.

You're allowed to fail. You're not allowed to lie.

-4
yesminister -4 points ago +2 / -6

Disregarding the fact that Elon Musk has made/founded exactly zero car companies, who said it wasn't possible? There are lots of car companies in the world.

Who said it was impossible to get a factory in China up and running? Plenty of companies have factories in China.

They have never delivered anything ahead of schedule, lol.

Re-landing rocketships? Is that even good? Nobody said it was impossible, that's for sure. It's not done because it doesn't save any costs.

Yes, any other electric car is probably as safe or safer than Tesla cars. It's the lack of an engine that does it.

-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

In other words, SpaceX needs subsidies to have any success at all?

-10
yesminister -10 points ago +2 / -12

And you say the same thing when people criticize Bill Gates, right?

-4
deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
-5
yesminister -5 points ago +1 / -6

Starship is SpaceX. What do you mean privately funded?

-15
yesminister -15 points ago +1 / -16

Yes I have. It made me a few quids but now I have no positions in Tesla because shorting is pretty retarded and there doesn't seem to be an end on the hype machine surrounding Tesla, so you'd have to be prepared to eat massive losses before you see any gains. I was lucky to short it before it fell.

-14
yesminister -14 points ago +3 / -17

Yeah to people of average intelligence it looks like that.

People with higher intelligence knows that he's not.

-7
yesminister -7 points ago +1 / -8

Nowhere has it been stated that we're only talking about Falcon 9. Why that restriction?

-8
yesminister -8 points ago +1 / -9

Ah, I refuted your point and you know it, so now cognitive dissonance kicks in.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›