Remember how we all laughed at Michael Avenatti? He's our Michael Avenatti

People need to understand that whether Lin Wood is right, he's not helping our cause. His claims are wild and unsubstantiated. He acts unhinged and unprofessional, but more importantly doesn't follow through with the evidence. Retweeting Q anon conspiracy theories doesn't count as evidence. He's a loose canon who calls people traitors and pedophiles based on speculation. He called for Pence to die by firing squad. Unfortunately, Trump has re-tweeted some of his stuff. We shouldn't encourage this. If for no other reason, it makes us look bad. Twitter loves it when Lin is trending because it gives the left distraction fuel to dismiss what is actually going on

Stop enabling him until he at the very least starts providing evidence. Is that seriously asking too much? Is that too high of a standard? Are we going to believe things just because we want them to be true? Yeah, I hope he does have proof that Roberts was compromised... but until he releases it, stop encouraging his awful behavior

Please upvote for visibility and spread this around. I’ve already tweeted at the relevant lawyers but did not hear back. If the lawyers didn’t already think of this it could make a difference

So Trump just needs to find 20k people in Wisconsin who were misled by the state to have incorrectly (illegally) voted indefinitely confined simply due to COVID. If he does, the state results will be nullified by the courts. How does he do this? He simply asks everyone who did to step forward (keep reading)

There were around 200k illegal votes cast this way, what are the odds 20k or more are either Republicans or honest Democrats? The catch is, when they come forward all they have to admit is that their votes were illegal because the state lied to them about COVID being a valid reason, which is absolutely true. They’re under no obligation to reveal who they voted for. If asked in court they simply plead the 5th. They never have tell anyone who they voted for. If 20k+ people come forward, then the state election is nullified and the points are taken away from Biden

If Trump can get relief granted from a WI judge, that would be huge and basically lock in the alternate electoral votes from that state

How do we do this? All Trump needs to do is simply tell everyone to step forward who had been misled to vote indefinitely confined in that state. Out of the 200k+ who voted indef confined, surely 20k or more are Republicans. Even if everyone who stepped forward was registered Republican, you cannot prove who they voted for and they have no obligation to say. If any were asked in court they can just plead the 5th. The election would then be nullified because it would be proven 20k+ votes were illegally cast from people who claimed to be indef confined from only COVID. EZ win

Ok, what if Trump simply asked all those who were misled to incorrectly vote indef confined to step forward. Out of the 240k indefinitely confined votes, there's a good chance 20k or more are Republicans. That's the margin of victory. Even if all the 20k+ who stepped forward were in fact Republicans, they'd be under no obligation to reveal who they actually voted for and there'd be no way to know for sure. If they were asked in court who they voted for they could plead the 5th. That would disqualify 20k votes and then Trump would be granted relief in court

Would this actually work? If so we need to spread the word

Keep the pressure on, do not relent

Here is the link for the AZ legislatures, message them and request they withhold assigning ectoral votes until at least a complete audit of AZ has been completed. I e-mailed all 50+ of them including the Democrats, took about an hour but it could make a difference. I suggest e-mailing them through the website to ensure it doesn't go to their junk mail

Also here is the contact for the PA speaker RINO loser who is currently refusing to allow a hearing of legislatures in that state. I suggest e-mailing him and requesting he allow a special hearing

If we check the mail in ballot signatures with scrutiny, we win.

It that's simple. All this other stuff is a distraction

The rejection rate this election cycle was 0.3%. In 2016 it was 3.0%

That difference right there is a Trump win

The issue is, to request an audit you have to open a case to do so in that state by a certain date. In PA that was already today, hopefully Giuliani didn’t f*ck that up. Michigan’s deadline is coming up next. I can only hope Trump's legal team don’t get sidetracked trying to prove these elaborate voter fraud cases. Those cases may go somewhere, but it's like trying to shoot from half court when all you need is a layup

Note that you generally can’t perform an audit and check signatures until the state electors have already certified. So the fact some of these states have certified is not a problem

During counting they intentionally hand waived verification and lowered threshold settings on machines. We know the real rejection rate is even higher than 3.0% as there was a massive influx of more than twice as many mail in ballots this election. There's absolutely no way the rejection rate is 1/10th that of of 2016. In these swing states the rejection rates are practically non existent. CHECK. THE. SIGNATURES

This is the easiest path to victory. It's an issue the left knows they cannot win in the court of public opinion. No reasonable person will insist the signatures shouldn't be checked. It will look really bad for any judge who denies Trump the ability to check signatures

If we check the mail in ballot signatures, we win.

It that's simple. All this other stuff is just a distraction

The rejection rate this election cycle was 0.3%. In 2016 it was 3.0%.

That difference right there is a Trump win

We know the real rejection rate is even higher than 3.0% since there was a massive influx of more than twice as many mail in ballots in 2020. There's no way it's lower than in 2016. And in these swing states the rejection rates are practically non existent. CHECK. THE. SIGNATURES

This is the easiest path to victory. It's an issue the left knows they cannot win in the court of public opinion. No reasonable person will insist the signatures shouldn't be checked. It will look really bad for any judge who denies Trump the ability to check signatures

I can only hope Trump's legal team didn't get sidetracked trying to prove these elaborate voter fraud cases. Those cases may go somewhere, but it's like trying to shoot from half court when all you need is a layup to win

The cutoff to file a case in PA was today. Did Giuliani open a case in PA to contest and audit the signatures? Michigan and other states are coming up too

I think there was massive fraud that altered the election, but I don't think it was done with Dominion. I think it was done the old fashioned way with rampant mail in ballot fraud. I don't see how cheating with Dominion is feasible. Here is my breakdown as to why. Please change my mind,

Case 1 - They used Dominion to switch votes. Why would they do this? A basic hand recount would reveal everything. The only way they could cover their tracks would be to go to all these precincts and perfectly rebalance the ballots. Michigan alone has dozens of precincts with 90-350% turnout, so it would appear the cheating occurred in all of those. They would have to go to each of those precincts, destroy the correct number of Trump ballots, and then add the correct number of Biden ballots. This is not viable at all. So they would just have to hope no recount was ever done, which seems like a terrible plan

Case 2 - They used Dominion to add imaginary votes. Why would they do this over just creating physical ballots? A simple recount would reveal that the imaginary ballots don't exist. If they wanted to cover their tracks they'd have to create the ballots anyways

Case 3 - They used Dominion to physically alter Trump ballots to Biden. This would be pretty slick, but I don't think it's possible. How would the machine undo the Trump vote without it looking incredibly suspicious during a recount?

With that said, maybe they are in fact morons and they cheated with Dominion. Maybe the reason the GA recount hasn't reveal rampant fraud yet is they are actually lying about their numbers. Possible, but seems pretty unlikely

UPDATE 11/18: Sadly, this is all a false flag. Doug Ross compiled the data with rounding errors. The data dumps late at night were favoring Biden by increments of 0.001, which is exactly the highest level of precision reported for each candidate's percentage. There's no way from the Edison data to determine a candidate's exact vote count other than multiplying that percentage by the total votes, which can be in the millions. Major loss of precision. When the candidates had the same percentage (i.e. both .494) they kept getting the exact same votes because he used a weighted average to determine who got what votes. For example if 100 new votes came up, but each candidate still had a ratio of 0.494, he'd give 49.4 (rounded) to each and the rest to the third party. Hopefully this isn't part of Sydney's evidence as it proves nothing other than the Edison data format is poorly designed

Sydney just tweeted about irrefutable statistical data found here

GA Data

PA Data

What's shown in this data appears to be very damning. In my opinion it without a doubt shows the votes were artificially manipulated. Read the links above for yourself but here is my takeaway,

1 - In GA after election night, there are dozens of times where "new votes" arrive in increments of almost exactly 4800. This happens to be almost exactly 1.0% of the running total of votes added up post 11/3. Coincidence? It's almost as if they stopped counting, changed something in Dominion, and it started using a percentage of votes counted afterwards

2 - In PA after election night, there are dozens of times where "new votes" arrive in increments of 6000. Again, this happens to be almost exactly 1.0% ofthe running total of votes added up post 11/3. Coincidence?

3 - Every single one of these 1.0% increment shifts not only favors Biden, but it improves Biden's vote by increments of 1.0%. Every. single. one. I think this is the most damning evidence

4 - In GA between after 11/6 2:32 both Biden and Trump are dead even with a difference in votes of exactly 0. However, dozens of updates appear where both candidate somehow get the exact same count. Dozens of times. Once Biden pulls ahead this inexplicable pattern continues. How is this possible? Was Dominion glitching out?

5 - As seen in the graphs, after about 11/4 8:00 in both states, all remaining data drops favor Biden almost exclusively. This is in sharp contrast with the all the data drops prior. This is extremely questionable, but Democrats would likely argue only mail in ballots happened to remain in both states coincidentally at the same time (yeah right)

6 - Votes start to be sporadically subtracted from both candidates. I believe this only happened post 11/3, but not 100% confirmed. Is this Dominion leaving a trail? An occasional adjustment here and there would make sense, but it happens dozens of times in just this data set alone

7 - Large data drops that inexplicably favor one candidate. They appear to almost always favor Biden, for example in GA at 11/4 17:12 Biden receives 98.8% of 19,000 votes. However I noticed in PA on 11/4 1:31 Trump received 99.9% of a 130k drop not sure what was going on there

If you have friends or family who are skeptical that election fraud actually happened show them this list. At the very least, they should be extremely concerned. Also, if anyone has more to add or good examples please share I will add to the list

1 - There are hundreds of sworn affidavits that we know of so far testifying that fraud occurred. The penalty for lying in these is 5 years minimum. The testimony ranges from mass numbers of Biden ballots unexplainably arriving in the middle of the night, Republican watchers being kicked out, being trained on how to circumvent mail in ballot verification, poll workers coercing people to vote Biden, and many many more sinister things

2 - The vote count mysteriously halted election night in most BG states. Why? "Experts" on the left say this is normal. Since they work in shifts 24/7, that doesn't make sense. But ok, assuming there is a good reason to "halt" see #3 below

3 - Despite the count being "halted", it actually resumed soon afterwards. Most prominently during 4 AM while the country was asleep. Why?

4 - Large amounts of vote drops (20k, 100k, etc) came in after Nov 3rd that favor Biden 90-100%. Many of these drops are statistically impossible. Most famous example is the 138k drop in MI that favored Biden 100%. I've seen articles addressing the 138k MI one specifically, but they falsely claim it was a clerical error that added a 0 and it was fixed. No, it wasn't, but even if it was 13.8k votes 100% for Biden is still impossible. And there's many, many more examples in the voting data from Edison

5 - After counting resumed election night (morning), Trump mysteriously started doing worse than the R senators in the BG states. Beforehand, he was doing just as well or better than these senators. How is this possible? There's simply no reason Republican mail in ballots would vote for R Senators but then not vote Trump in such large quantity

6 - Significant numbers of votes subtracted/transferred in the voting date, and usually late at night or early in the morning. Again, many examples of this but the one in VA here stands out to me as being particularly retarded

7 - Trump 2020 did better percent wise in almost all major cities across the country, except most notably in 4-5 specific BG cities where he in fact did much worse. These are also the same places where Biden had a highly suspicious amount of Biden-only votes (no down vote). Trump won every Bellweather county but one, yet we're led to believe he lost the election

8 - Mail in ballot rejection rate was a whopping 10x lower in 2020, despite there being more than double the mail in ballots as 2016. How? If anything the rejection rate should have been significantly higher... and it wasn't even just slightly lower, it was 10x lower!

9 - In various BG states tens of thousands of ballots were accepted from people who are either dead or who do not legally live there (that we know of)

10 - Eight out of nine fake signatures tested were accepted by NV machines. This is unacceptable

11 - Voter registration of 90+ year olds in PA increased 1000% in 2020

12 - Poll watchers were intentionally blocked from observing the process for days at a time. Why? COVID is simply not a good excuse

13 - In PA mail in ballots were illegally opened early to notify users of errors. This is illegal and was ironically proven in affidavits submitted on behalf of PA

14 - The fact that states don't have a final ballot count days after the election is completely unacceptable. Before tallying the votes, they should get a count of all the ballots first. The fact states can keep updating the remaining vote count for days and days afterwards is a joke. This opens the door up very wide to cheating

15 - Sworn testimony from numerous sources that ballots arrived at stations AFTER the cut off time, in the middle of the night, in states that did not allow late ballots (i.e. Michigan). Why are ballots allowed to arrive late in these states? Regardless what the postmarked date says, how are these not considered "late"?

16 - How did it take an eternity for most BG states to count their ballots? By comparison Texas and Florida counted their 10+ million ballots in a few hours. The BG states averaged like 10k per DAY after the election. Some states like AZ and NV flat out refused to count on some days. I'm sorry, what? This is unacceptable and even in the off chance no fraud was going on, how can you have faith in those results?

17 - Why the f*ck was card board used to block windows in one of the counting rooms?

18 - Voter participation in a few key counties had phenomenal turnout while their neighboring counties under performed

19 - Dr. Ashiva's presentation raises serious concerns, but I haven't seen enough follow up from either him or other sources. If he's being honest, he should follow up with analysis of more counties and do other states

Edit: I’m wrong because the estimated remaining votes should NOT affect the reported percentage for each candidate. Their percentage should be calculated based on the actual votes counted.
———— In the data feed every candidate had their vote count go down at various points, not just Trump (see comments in the mega thread). Their vote count going down isn't evidence of "losing" votes either. Why?

Each candidate's vote count in the data feed is represented as a percentage of the estimated total votes in the state. That estimate is based on how many votes have been counted, and how many they think are left to count. Sometimes that estimate decreases

When that estimated total goes down, at least someone's effective count will decrease. If you had 50% of the votes, and the number of estimated votes went down, your vote count goes down. You're not actually losing votes, the data format is just unintuitive and people assume the total vote count is a known number that can never go down

I sincerely hope I'm wrong, because Sydney Powell is referencing it, numerous articles are quoting it, and Trump's latest Dominion tweet may tie into it. Please change my mind

Dinesh D'Souza cited today in this video that Biden got 100% of a 138k vote drop in Michigan around 4 am on Nov 4th. I thought this was debunked, did this actually happen? I think this is related to the infamous screenshot where Biden's vote went up 100k+ but no one else's vote moved. Their explanation was a clerical error with an extra 0. Does this show up in the actual data feed?

Edit: People are saying yes, can someone provide a link or screenshot of the data dump showing the Biden percentage?

Edit2: browsing through the NY times election feed for MI here on Nov 4th at 11:31 there was an update of 159,152 votes and Trump only got 5968. In other words, Biden got almost 97% of 159,152 ballots. That update may have included the dump of 138,000 that Dinesh is talking about, or maybe it was a different time. Either way, wtf