It was mostly Obama judges that overturned the bumpstocks decision.
The Senate made Trump hire Kushner and Parscale? The Senate made Trump keep a lot of Obama layovers when both Obama AND Biden have fired the lot of them from the previous administration the first few months in office? Sounds like you need a civics lesson.
Why refuse to sign the bill even though it would be overridden? Because he fucking swore not to sign another one in office. Why is that excusable?
You're literally retarded. Keep trusting in Kushner, Sessions, Bolton, and Barr.
Under it, but your point is still valid. What a tard.
If you can't understand that there could have been more, bigger accomplishments had Trump made better hiring decisions - that's on you.
You don't win a game and think 'oh I did good enough, why bother improving?'; you supposed to win and think 'what can I do even better next time?'
Acknowledging areas of improvement isn't nitpicking - pull the tampon out of your crying bloody pussy if you can't stand criticism.
Not at all. What's wrong with acknowledging areas that Trump could have improved on?
What does any of that have to do with terrible decisions he made while in office? Trump himself has said there are things he would have done differently.
Go fuck yourself with your deity worship. Trump is a great man, but a man nonetheless. It's okay to recognize his faults and bad decisions while in office.
Trump is the one who pushed for the ban on bumpstocks, made numerous terrible personnel hires, signed a giant globalist spending bill while promising to never sign another one, then signed another one in his last weeks in office.
He's not infallible.
Wouldn't Trump's 'Right To Try' prevent manufacturers from being sued for non FDA approved medicines?
Shit was so bad that the Dem mayor that DeSantis worked with actually issued a statement defending him calling the report BS
It's not semantics. The plank, and pearls verse, along with judge lest not ye be judged are specifically talking about judging intentions(heart, as only God can judge one's heart) and spirituality vs their actions.
John 7 and Galatians(I think it's somewhere in 2,but I can't remember specifically) spell it out clearly.
Matthew 7 is also pretty clear when it says that we're supposed to judge others by the standards we'd like to be judged by. Be humble and have humility. Judge in a helping spirit and not a vindictive or mean spirit.
Somewhere in one of the Corinthians specifically states that it is our duty to judge members of the church accordingly. 'For what have I to do with judging those outside? Is it not those who are inside that you are to judge?'(I don't remember it exactly, but that's pretty close).
We're supposed to judge others actions as a means to help them because we care - but we are not to damn them or judge them unfairly. It's the Golden Rule, just a bit wordier.
I made a typo. Phone corrected 'ye' to 'he'.
I don't know why you wrote a book about this, the Bible is pretty clear. If you see someone living in sin, it is your DUTY as a Christian to judge their actions and help them move past whatever struggles they're having.
If you see someone living in sin and you think 'oh hur dur I can't say anything because I'm not supposed to judge' you are just as guilty as they are.
You can always just read the Bible yourself and make a decision based off of that. Would probably be your best bet.
You would be wrong if you did guess that.
Guess so. Have a good one!
Not particularly.
I didn't get those confused, you did. Sorry bud.
We are quite literally called to judge and hold others accountable for their actions, just as others are supposed to hold us accountable.
Judge lest not he be judged is by far the most misconstrued out of context verse in the entire Bible.
Who the fuck cares about Ukraine?
Probably a plea deal taken on the advice of some pussy ass lawyer.
Yup. Morally justified, but legally pre-meditated.
If you're genuinely curious how the ME can determine an overdose, read the report. The full thing is available online. They're very thorough and explain their reasoning. It breaks down how the fenantyl that was ingested had already spread through the bloodstream and contributed to his death in the time after ingestion.
Floyd "couldn't breathe" sitting in the car because he said he was 'claustrophobic' and asked to be put outside.
What price should be paid for not contributing to a guy's death and calling twice for paramedics? It sounds like you're arguing with emotion vs logic.
Your point is wrong, though. He would have died regardless of Chauvin. The ME specifically stated that he would have ruled Floyd's death a result of drug overdose even if Floyd was found dead at his own home alone.
That statement alone means that Chauvin played no part in his death. If every other factor stayed the same but Chauvin knee didn't happen, Floyd would still have died the same way. If that is true, how is Chauvin guilty of murder?
Chauvin and the other officers called paramedics twice and took Floyd out of the car, like he asked, and put him on the ground, like he asked, because Floyd bitched about being claustrophobic and not being able to breathe, and held Floyd in an approved restraint that didn't harm Floyd per the autopsy.
I can agree that Chauvin holding the knee after Floyd was unconscious was excessive, but, again, it played no part in Floyd's death. I'd be okay with a reckless endangerment charge - but they way overcharged.
Neither is strychnine ffs. What's your point?
No eyed Dan currently. His other retina detached and he's temporarily blind in his other eye for a few weeks at the very least.