Actually the Trump campaign is shifted their message to focus on signature verification right after he got on board, and pushing the statistical work of people like Matt Braynard. Barnes pushed heavily for these avenues as the best path before he started with the campaign. The change in strategy is inline with the work he is claiming to do. He was also in the ground in Georgia trying to get signature verification there. I'm sure the SOS (if the cuck is still responding to messages) can give you prove Barnes was in the meetings.
Also I don't get the same sense that he is pushing his brand like you do. If he was he would be doing a massive social campaign and pushed for more media appearance. Instead he is spending time to respond to a community on Youtube that he has built way more all this happened. I believe that his criticism of Powell + Wood + Giulani are more warranted.
He is not on their payroll, he has said multiple times over the last month that he is offering his time for free. The campaign doesn't keep a list of all legal volunteers that I can find, maybe you can reach out to them to get an official statement (I am not American + donor so I doubt I'll get a response). However he has stated multiple times on public record that he is working become of Trump's personal request. If he is lying I'm sure the campaign would've filed cease and desist.
The campaign has been fighting in Georgia this whole time, they just haven't made the noise that Wood + Powell have because they've been getting their hands dirty with verifying affidavits and most importantly getting video evidence from the Arena. Surely we can agree that whenever vast amounts of money are available, malicious intent begins to creep in. I am much more impressed with parties like the Amistad Project who are digging up hard evidence, filing lawsuits that are much better than Wood + Powell, and are not simping for money.
The campaign does have a list of all their legal counsel that I could find. Maybe you can try messaging them. I doubt I will get a response as I am not American.
Btw if a high profile lawyer is lying about working directly for the President on public record, you don't think the campaign will send a cease and desist letter?
Ellis and Giuliani and working directly for the campaign like Barnes is. I cannot confirm whether they are taking a salary or not, but I suspect they are if they are the legal counsel. As for criticizing, yes you wouldn't want your official counsel who has de facto became the face of the movement to criticize, you leave it to the people underneath or surrogates to do it. That is why lawyers like Barnes, Harmeet Dillon, and Ron Coleman are the ones criticizing, no Rudy.
Also Powell and Wood have fundraised a huge war chest from the public. Barnes hasn't taken a single dime. You can interpret that however you want, but I my view there is a lower risk of someone pulling an Avenatti when they are not making any money at all.
Name one thing I said that is spewed by the main stream media? I am not an expert in demographic changes hence I did my research by watching Peoples'd Pundit. Richard Baris has been the most accurate pollster in the last 3 cycles, consistent right about the enthusiasm and turnout that Trump is getting. He can breakdown precinct level data of Colorado for you if you want. Hence I advise people to go to his livestreams and get real expert information, and not speculate.
Maybe you should do a little research on the expert I reference before discarding my point. Rich Baris broke one voting preference betweeen 1st, 2nd, and 3rd generation immigrant in Arizona, he can do that for you regarding Colorado.
Maybe you should watch some video from People's Pundit on Youtube.... maybe even throw in a superchat and ask him about Colorado. While I have no faith in Dominion, you'll get an expert's opinion on why Colorado is turning blue regardless of Dominion.
No my thoughts don't line up with the MSM narrative at all. I don't watch MSM and haven't in years.
Smoke screen to pardon Flynn? The media has call been calling it quid pro quo regardless. There was nothing Trump could have done to get the media to cover over it positively. People who've developed a cult around Powell are spinning as some sort of 4D chess move to fit their own narrative.
My thought line up with a portion of the base that has seen plenty of grifters, back stabbers, and people not fit for purpose embed themselves into the movement. Remember when Brad Parscale was some digital warrior viking, how did that turn out?
I am in agreement with you. I don't have issues with Wood + Powell riling up the base, but you have to call out BS or mistakes when you see it.
I have forgotten which iteration the Kraken has evolved into, with this supposed MOAB evolving everyday to suit the latest narrative. When the Trump campaign and Powell split, wasn't that so Powell can focus on criminal lawsuits while the campaign focus on civil? What has happened since... every one of Powell's has been civil lawsuits, stitched together haphazardly often using evidence already submitted in other lawsuits.
What I am seeing is more divergence between what the Trump team's objectives and that of the Wood + Powell team.
And there are legitimate reasons to criticize some of the actions that Powell and Wood have taken. There is a clear reason why the campaign have distanced themselves. In fact Trump was specifically clear that he wants voters to turn out in Georgia and rebuked the martial law narrative.
Maybe you should watch the latest Viva Frei upload and see has actively crafty strategy and helping in multiple lawsuits. I also disagree on his opinion regarding a 2024 Trump run, but he is still fighting for the President.
In this case I do, because signature verification wasn't even included in the GA and PA lawsuit until this week. The initially lawsuits focused only on election official improprieties and lack of meaningful access.
I am aware of what officials in PA did, but I am specifically talking about GA. the SOS is a cuck and won't blatantly ignore court orders like PA. Turning GA will be then be the foundation and precedent to take on the other swing states.
I would assume that he would be given the overall strategy of campaign, but won't have oversight into every department.
The concern I have is that the election lawyers who want to focus on the hard ballots are all purged from the team. Georgia could've swung back to Trump already if they went after signature verification right away. This would bring the much need momentum to start flipping the other states and add steel to the spines of GOP state legislatures.
I agree there was vote switching done in MI and WI, but you are looking at 100,000s of ballot dumped that are clearly fraudulent, and can be overturned much quicker and easier using concrete evidence. The side that wants to focus on verification and statistics in the legal team is being purged.
I agree with that. What is see right now is the campaign taken over by Sidney Powell, who has systematically purged others from it who disagree with what she has. Why can the campaign not run 2 strategies at once? Why lay all your eggs in one basket, when the evidence for ballot fraud and stuffing is more concrete and damning?
Looks like Arizona AG is joining on the side of Texas too... can a legal expert confirm?
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163258/20201209171850333_TX%20v%20PA%20Motion%20for%20Leave%20FINAL.pdf