1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is it. It's a trade-off between a mediocre confirmation now, and one we really want later.

Upcoming planned election fuckery and chaos by Dems makes it hard to say which is the better option. IDK but let us hope Trump knows.

3
Yupyupyup 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree with Brian Kolfage. Liberal tears are both exiciing and addictive.

1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why is there always some loud cunt screeching in every single one of these videos? ALWAYS.

Loud cunt: OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD!

God: *Yawn* next...

1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

They don't want it in their favor. They want it contested.

2
Yupyupyup 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is what I see coming. They offed her on purpose.

1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ever since the Norm Eisen stuff was posted a few days ago, I feel like it's finally become clear that their plan is not to steal the election. They don't want to win the vote, they can't. They want it to be contested, they want a color revolution, they want maximum chaos. Having eight sitting justices increases the chances for chaos. I wouldn't be surprised of somone on the DNC yanked RBG's plug because now was the best time for it according to their Playbook.

6
Yupyupyup 6 points ago +6 / -0

If only Nick Sandmann wer out of law school already.

1
Yupyupyup 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depends on the king. In this case, abso-fucking-lutely.

3
Yupyupyup 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm pretty sure the entire planet would be covered in radioactive smoke at this point, but yeah.

2
Yupyupyup 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had to work hard not to spit my drink twice while reading that tweet. Fucking win.

3
Yupyupyup 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just when you think shit couldn't get any more retarded...

2
Yupyupyup 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or... or... they want a non-functioning supreme court, and they were like, okay there won't be time to appoint a new justice... wait for it... now.

10
Yupyupyup 10 points ago +10 / -0

Honestly I don't disagree. I want to see someone in there right, I mean hard right, not just some fucking center-right shill that will go along with whatever. I don't really think she's the best good choice. On the other hand, strategically it might be smart to get someone in there fast, to deal with the post-election fraudulence that is definitely coming. I'm sure that GEOTUS knows better than us. Was just saying lay off with the kids thing, they had a special needs child and probably started adopting then. I would have too. If she's a bad candidate, she's a bad candidate, no need to go there.

19
Yupyupyup 19 points ago +22 / -3

They have five biological kids, they adopted two. Also she's 48. Chill pede.

6
Yupyupyup 6 points ago +6 / -0

It really is evil, it's hard to believe actually. Faith in humanity = shaken.

12
Yupyupyup 12 points ago +13 / -1

Ah shit. Well, thanks for the update pede.

2
Yupyupyup 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would vote Candace Owens in 2024, no questions asked.

Think of the glory of dems being forced to choose between voting red and NOT voting for a black, female president.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›