These silly ideas only open you up to losing some silly optics battle. They'll tell you they're vaccinated, they'll even show you video, but if the vaccine is dangerous it'll be a saline shot in that syringe. Keep your eye on the ball.
The other side of the coin being what? What did they do? Is there a secret war they're fighting that you think will come to light? What do you think they've done behind the scenes while running this distraction that's all for show? It's a fantasy for the sake of it. What legacy did they contribute to their office, is this fight? What could possibly come to light?
We've been experiencing attacks of this magnitude all year and for the last few years. No one calls them for what they are, but I can recall three times while I've been with my current company that there were major internet and phone outages in one region or another for an hour or so.
Having an army of ex-attorneys general doesn't make you look any stronger or give you anything. We have been the silent majority for almost 15 years now, 4 more ex-pols with no power doesn't do shit for us. We need more than a voice, we need action.
If any of the ex-friends had somehow become media darlings you might be into something, but even the msm isn't that stupid. They pick their lapdogs pretty wisely.
I'm not trying to run defense for them, but if he was murdered by them and they knew it, his death might be part of the cause for the sting operation that Steve Pieczenik keeps claiming is underway. I want to believe him. You wouldn't want to indicate that you were on to them until you were ready to make the arrest, and arresting someone for Seth's murder may have been too high profile. I am praying that we see justice in this.
If Steve Pieczenik is right and this has been one long sting operation, then good police WOULD sit on it for 4 years. I Don't know if I have faith in the FBI, but you never end your investigation when they're about to make the handoff. This timely release would indicate that his murder was indeed related to the election of 2016, and whatever happened in 2020.
It wasn't just that they reported the same ratio at consecutive times, it was actually incredibly unlikely that they would ever report the same ratio at all. The relevant counterpoint would I guess be the existence of hash collisions and birthday attacks, but I think it's probably not a very good argument when the number he gave was on the order of 10,000 I think and not just 365.
If you want to be thorough, yes. I assume that is why Sidney Powell says she has huge bags full of shredded ballots. They remove any random chunk of ballots and replace it with the one at their predetermined ratio. I also have a feeling that this is part of the reason they stopped the counting. They needed time to not just produce physical ballots, but to move them to the places they needed to be once they doctored the vote counts so heavily. Once you're done counting the recounting can begin, and you can't have shredded ballots laying next to your uncreased ballots.
Also, by the way, that means we should expect to find both trump AND biden votes among the shredded ballots. It will be the ratio of those ballots that is important.
When you say going through replication does that mean youre trying to replicate his results? If so, could you do it for other states as well? I know everyone is concerned about swingstates because of the actual election results, but my curiosity about California is killing me. I dont even know if they use Dominion but I just dont feel like the news coming out of California regarding lockdown protests is lining up with it being a blue state anymore.
I think your spot on. When I look at how the algorithm would have functioned normally, and then think about how easy it would be to take ANY random box of 1k votes and switch it for a different 1k vote box with the correct ratio, the construction of it makes even more sense. You have 200k ballots in predetermined ratios and youre asking the computer where to put them to make it the least noticeable. It becomes a very simple swap of your boxes of ballots for the ones that are already there, and the algorithm has done all the heavy lifting to make sure that statistically its going to work out.
The algorithm as he explained it is used to flip a predetermined number of votes. The votes must already exist. Is that because the machine physically cant create votes out of thin air? Probably not. The reason the votes must exist is to mask the fraud. The denominator, the total number of votes, that has to line up with reality as close as you can get it, because ostensibly the people who created those ballots must exist on voter rolls, the phsyical ballots could be checked during a recount/audit, etc. You then take the SMALLEST portion of ballots you can get away with and apply your flipping algorithm to only those. When you use the algorithm to spread your fraud over many precincts, an audit of a random sample at any particular precinct is less likely to turn up fraudulent votes.
Is it being put in on a usb stick? Is it being fed directly over the internet? It isn't clear, but what is clear is that this type of coordination across precincts would not be possible without communication of some kind. There was a central location informing and being informed, and whether this happened over the internet directly from the machines or on the secondary laptops that we saw the usb sticks being plugged into, we don't know for sure yet. This is a sophisticated method in that it is specifically designed to cover its tracks by using the incredibly powerful combination of a fancy balancing algorithm and live vote count information.
You still have to sneak the physical ballots in to cover your tracks for a recount, but with this method you will have to sneak in the least number possible. They might have gotten even lower dem turnout than expected, which is why they were scanning physical ballots the night of the election to pad the vote totals that much more.
The reason is because you can't have a Venezuelan election where you got 300% of registered voters turning up. The strategy is meant to mask fraud by smoothing it out over as many precincts as possible so that you can use all of that extra wiggle room in every precinct without it looking like you just had 2000% voter turnout in Detroit alone. You then use the next couple weeks before the certification to produce the physical ballots if you need to. I'm positive that part of the reason they paused the counts for multiple days in a lot of places was to physically move ballots around and get them where they needed to be for recounts.
When they say that the victory was a landslide and that's why they got caught, they aren't just saying it. It's true. In a normal, low enthusiasm second term election, this fraud would likely have gone unnoticed because it would not have raised as many red flags.
The summary is basically: There is an impossibly small chance that two precincts converge on the same ratio of votes. We can show that on the night in question it happened 200+ times and in a pattern consistent with a specific algorithm.
The work is done, you don't just show the video. You prove it to a judge by walking trough the work step by step. This is also the cherry on top of Georgia at this point. This analysis can and will be applied to other states. You have smoking gun videos of suitcases full of ballots, fake pipe bursts, selfie videos of ballot counting alone in a room, and then this on top of it. Fraud obviously happened on a large scale in Fulton county, and this algorithm being uncovered will be HUGE evidence that the same thing occured in other states EVEN WIHTOUT the smoking gun video evidence they have in Georgia.
This piece of evidence by itself shows that the servers were connected to the internet (because there had to be communication to achieve this) and that there were orders being given out (to computers and maybe people) from a central location. The conspiracy (probably) already crosses state lines and becomes federal just because the chance that your server is in GA is pretty small, so you were communicating with people out of state to commit a serious felony. If the central location could already do it from out of state, theres no reason they couldn't do it in EVERY state. They already have a model for the infrastructure.
"There is specific evidence that the vote counts were constructed and adjusted in real time using predictive polling data combined with live vote totals, but with roughly 200,000 of the votes being actively balanced for a 14.7% maximum Trump share of the affected votes. This would only have been possible with precinct coordination with a central location or server via the internet. "
This was just a sophisticated ballot stuffing. They use a computer algorithm to spread their stuffing as even as possible in real time so that it might go unnoticed. It was to make it appear close and NOT suspicious. In a closer race these things may have been virtually undetectable, or we may not have looked. The clear cases of fraud with 98% vote counts and 300% turn outs is what alerted us to it.
This analysis by Edward Solomon is a historic moment. I don't know who or what tipped him off but this is incredible.
I mean he could be an Asian American guy. That might be his doctor.