Rephrasing the passage
"At this stage, the fraud that we can confirm does not seem to be enough to alter the election result. We should be honest and tell you that. Of course, that could change."
to
"He said the fraud won't change the results."
...is somewhat, not exactly but somewhat, like rephrasing the passage
"There were fine people on both sides...and I'm not talking about the white supremacists and the neo-Nazis, who should be condemned totally."
to
"He said there were fine people on both sides."
Cucker is telling us to moveon.org
Tucker Carlson said to stop looking at the fraud and accept Biden?
If they stay on fox then yes.
Not necessarily. If they're under contract, a deal's a deal. Plus, there's nothing wrong with having some patriots reporting from behind enemy lines.
I see no reason to turn on the likes of Tucker Carlson, Mark Levin, Judge Janeane at this point.
Someone rationally explain the sudden new hate for Tucker Carlson
THE GOLDEN GOOSE!
He's golden, in numerous ways; and geese are known to be staunch protectors of their beloved people, tough as nails, and fearless, vicious bastards on the attack against all who dare transgress in their domain.
A towering historical figure of such magnitude as Donald Trump rightly deserves a new nickname every so often :p
Got, thanks
Fourth box after jury box
Over/under on percentage of Michael's stores that get chachied this weekend?
(aaaaand another new term coined on the spot just for my fellow patriots in the .win :)
cha•chi /cha'-chee/ -ed, -ing (v.t., v.i.) to arrange (as lettered items in a store display or the like) to spell out a word or message // Ex.: the chachied messages popping up in alphabet coffee mugs at all the stores
Scott Baio is so alpha, he got banned from the Playboy Mansion for banging too many Playmates that Hugh Hefner was involved with.
As if I needed further inducement to suddenly like this guy! Thanks brother
LOL Rex Rimshot the porn star
...Agent?
Any idea what the upshot of this is? Does it affect Trump's chances to get a fair count (i.e., win) in Maricopa?
Until proven otherwise,
WYOMING IS BEING USED AS A DISTRACTION
Follow
One
Course
Until
Successful
4chan Autists on suicide watch
Why? Thought autists were the good guys?
Yeah I thought I was smart until right now
We all are, Ron. After all, it takes intelligence to recognize it in others. And we have it here in spades.
Hardest working Pede. Thank you!!!!
God no shit. We are in the presence of greatness, folks. A whole lot of it, from many of our fellow patriots in addition to PedeInspector here.
What if the patriots that be hadn't shrewdly planned in advance and boldly made the move from deaddit? We'd be rectally reamed right now in terms of sharing information and encouragement.
Every elephant on the planet just strolled into the courtroom.
I've heard of packing the court but this is ridiculous
::rimshot::
Autists be kingmakers
(Though I make no claim to being an autist) WE ARE THE NEWS NOW
This is known as quote mining, and playing gotcha.
No, it's known as you spewing false accusations like a douche nozzle, parroting random Poli Sci 101 buzzword catchphrases (like the above), and getting caught.
Quit crying like it's the first time. This must happen constantly.
Upvoted you but it didn't take.
You: ...all they do is shape public opinion, and in the direction of ending the US as a sovereign Nation. This is not Constitutionally protected activity. Instead the Constitution condemns it outright. SEE: sedition.
Also you: I never described the press as "bad people," that's your strawman.
Yeah, sedition isn't something bad people do. Either that, or you don't actually know what the term "strawman argument" means or how to use it. It's one or the other; you can't have it both ways. (People who use fancy terms that they don't know the meaning of often do it in the mistaken belief that it makes them appear more intelligent to those whom they consider less so. Is that due to ego? :)
Then there's this...
You: The press is a corporation.
Also you: I would never think anyone would conflate that with a corporation.
LOL I'm not off the subject. You are entirely off...your rocker.
I'm done here.
Great point.
Already stocking up quietly and slowly on TP, rubbing alcohol, paper towels, Kleenex, hand soap, disinfectant spray (off brand; not paying $25-35 per can for Lysol LOL)
People are fucking imbeciles when they swarm stores and clean out shelves in stark terror of shortages—thereby creating the shortages they were trying to avoid. If everyone just bought what they normally use and no more, there'd be no shortages. But that would involve people not being stupid selfish fear-driven idiots, addicted to the boob tube.
You can say that again. Right up there with the Sabres' Buffalo Slug debacle.
You falsely claimed you said nothing about corporations.
So brave. If you're going to call me a liar, you better be hiding behind your keyboard.
I made no false claim. You, however, falsely claimed without evidence that "the press" is a—as in one, a single—corporation.
LOL if it were true, you would be able to back up such a bizarre claim with facts. Maybe by revealing its corporate NAME, the STATE where the imaginary company was incorporated, the YEAR of incorporation. These would be a matter of public record, if your statement were true.
Remember: Words mean things. You're supposed to know what that is before you use them.
And, corporations aren't a bad idea or pure evil; that's a sick socialist lie straight out of Soviet Russia and mainstream media.
Here's a learning exercise: Go ask 100 educated people if "the press" is one single corporation. When you get your 100th no, come back, and I'll accept your apology. (Extra credit: track the number who laugh aloud vs. only giving a puzzled grin when you ask :)
Yes he is. O captain! My captain!
OT...remember what happened to the New York Islanders when they incorporated that Gorton's seafood hat into their logo? Fans revolted in a screaming mass. The team "deep-sixed" it and restored the original logo.
LOVE TRUMP♥S HAT ...just not that one :p
One rarely gets the chance to see such detailed, yet concise, carefully prepared sarcasm.